Will machines completely replace all human beings?

We will not decide to become machines, merely some of us, if they really can. In this case or other similar political decisions we should not use pronouns, not speak of “us”, not say “we” because not we, but merely few powerful people decide, if they really can.

You could always volunteer for the Guinea pig programs.

What exactly makes you think that asking would make any difference. Obama signed the executive order that allows any experimentation on the population as long as it is justified by “National Security” (which of course is anything and everything).

Any experimentation on the population! That’s unsurpassable dictatorship!

Any experimentation on the population! That’s unsurpassable dictatorship![/quote

No it just appears that way. He is only a figurehad.

it’s always been the military-industrial complex. They have the big guns: the super duper computers. The fact is, society is almost at the lowest ebb of integrating both concepts: democracy and capital. The ultimate failure is when democracy as a social system cannot support it’s self, through free enterprise. We are, and it is a gut level feeling, at a very critical point in the history of social economics, the last Great Recession was just symptomatic, like they say, of overall weakness. The trick is, One is led to believe, you can’t have one without the other, and they may be right.

Arniminus, lol you bastarrrdo. U machine hatah
Why you hatin son you machine hatin on a machinelol
.

Lol
Nope!

Well he has done truly unbelievable things that no one in their right mind would stand for. He even tried to illegally move nuclear weapons into central USA (apparently in preparation for another false flag attempt. Muslims aren’t very good at such guile). When the military commanders in charge of such things simply said, “no”, they were fired. But the list of atrocities he has participated in is endless.

James, please link to that exec order so I can show it to people.

You all jump in like rats down a drain-pipe!
Here one barely believable rumour that the hated black-at-the-top has done and you are all over him like a rash.


Barbarianhorde, do you still want to change your vote to no?

:laughing:

Actually capitalists don’t want competition, rivalry and so on. So it leads to more corruption and to socialism. Socialism needs capital in order to exist. So it leads to more corruption … Simultaneously democracy changes in its abnormal form ochlocracy and leads at last to anarchy (chaos). So the all-time winner gets his monarchy.

An interest stream of non-sequiters. Thanks for that unique insight into the working of your mind.

He has never been beloved, has he?

Well that is certainly an easy thing to ask for, but…

Realize the executive orders in the USA aren’t as they used to be 50 years ago. Long ago, each order was a specific item of concern, easily understood and specific, and only for use during obvious emergencies such as war time (the only reason executive orders exist). But these days, an executive order will pretty simply point out a few items, but each of those items is actually an entire agenda of perhaps 100’s of more specific items which are then laid out in sometimes 100’s of pages of legalese with tricky wording. And when you are concerned about anything involving the general public, they are always written to be concealed in rhetoric; “plausible deniability” and “obscurity”.

The very term “Terrorist”, not being officially defined at first, led to each department making its own definition. Homeland Security’s definition ended up being “Any act undermining the structure of the USA” (or something close to that). But realize that to the DHS, anything that gets in their way is “undermining the structure of the USA” because they are a part of that structure (now).

So I’ll have to do some serious mining and dig deep to find that particular item and wording. I remember from years ago a variety of youtube exposes on that issue. I watched the Army’s experiments on their own as well as Texas police on college students (of which they were not aware). I read the Air Forces extremely technical report on the exact nature of their subtle weapons concerning the use of microwave affects upon the brain. But just now quickly searching, those videos have been removed (a great many disappear every day without notice).

But in the mean time, a few related and still up on your net are the following;
Dr Barrie Trower: Experimentation on the Public
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMMEQNnSZIo[/youtube]
The HAARP Project
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rH4voteSJw[/youtube]
Leuren Moret, “WhistleBlower”
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmBhrnFwl2M[/youtube]

It is all U.N., New World Order, G8 and G20 residue (the God-wannabes).

Only when they were putting him into office.

Probably not … civilization is a delicate thing

It is not possible to rule and govern the world population (today: about 7 billions) democratically, it is not possible to rule and govern the population of the EU (today: about 500 millions) democratically, it is not possible to rule and govern the population of the US (today: about 300 millions) democratically in the long run. Merely populations which numbers are not higher than the number of a village or a polity (ancient Greece) can be ruled democratically in the long run.

So, what happened in hnistory when former small populations growed and became controllable? The form of government changed! Democraties changed to monarchies. De facto the European nations are only 10%- or 20%-nations because they depend on the EU (correctly also called: EUSSR), and this political monster is not ruled democratically. Those who believe in a “democratic” EU or other lies have no idea how power, rule, goverrnace, authority, command, leadeship, control work, especially in the long run.

Therefore “keep it small”. Stop trying to govern the entire world. It is called “distributed intelligence” rather than “central intelligence”. They would have been wiser to have formed the “Distributed Intelligence Agency”, DIA, instead of the CIA. But that would have taken a wisdom they didn’t have at that time. IBM learned much later the serious advancement of DIA over CIA. And DIA is fundamentally democratic.

Interesting. Do you know Barrie Trower?

Depends on why you ask. :sunglasses: