Why the Nazis actually won...

  1. perhaps communism crashed because its base philosophy was flawed; especially after mechanisation of farming, because then farming requires it’s supporting industries, which in turn require capitalist institutions etc.

  2. hmm, not sure if rockets were before jets, but either way I am sure the Germans didn’t invent it or its originator [ancient Chinese wasn’t it?].

  3. I could point out that the fact western medicine follows Mengele, could simply mean that they are equally as ‘evil’.

I think the difference for modern medicine though is in the nature of it’s practice and application.

Obe

Probably true, though Britain also holds a balance between the states and Europe, are allies etc, china/asia is another player. whoever comes out on top will have to do as they are told as much as anyone else IMHO ~ this as there are many balancing parties involved. That’s the fundamental design here surely? …and can we not ask if that’s a good thing?

Jk; in the end it all comes down to the germans being those good chappies who build our cars for us, and the chinese for most everything else. Jolly good chaps them all. :laughing: hmm I think that was a wrong thing to say. :stuck_out_tongue:

In the end america got wall street [no’s 1] and we got the city of london financial district [no’s 2]. Now guess where much of the worlds money first gets syphoned off!

I wonder if you asked one of the few remaining Nazis, if they would tell you they feel as though they’ve won.

:stuck_out_tongue:

I’m 99% sure they would bitch and moan about women, blacks, liberals etc. and make out they were really hard done by.

And whose fault is that? If whites can’t come together collectively to defend ourselves we as a race deserve to die.

As for white females they’re too busy with money and careers to have family or children. Another nail in our coffin due to a race that has a inability to even mate anymore. It’s like the entire white European caucasian race has gone queer.

If whites can’t compete with other races it’s nature’s will that we go extincted.

End of argument.

The British royal family and many MPs had strong bonds with the Nazis…

http://harmoniaphilosophica.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/wwii-conspiracies-uk-and-nazis/

Yes, but that was because the ideology behind Nazism was common among intellectuals. Many of them agreed with much of the policies passed by Hitler. They believed in economic control by a strong central authority. Nazis just put into practice what they all believed. It’s why they stuck their fingers in their ears, closed their eyes and screamed no, no, no, when it first came out about the camps. The intellectuals didn’t want to believe it, when it could no longer be denied, they did their best to distance themselves from the Nazis. It’s why it’s not common knowledge that Nazis were just putting into practice one possible result of their Progressive beliefs.

Many of the Nazi beliefs were practiced outside of Germany long before the Nazis got all open about the stuff.

Harry was not saying he was a Nazi with that costume, Harry was being a dumb-ass kid with the costume. It does not prove your point.

Actually YOU prove my point…
By saying that all intellectuals were on the same page as Hitler.
What I am just saying is that the same logic of Nazism (take eugenics for example) are still the mainstream ideology in the world.

So, because Hitler was anti tobacco smoking and had banned it, the Nazis won?

Relating to the countries or nations there was no “we” and no “they”, as you suggest, but there were a “we” of powerless people (99%) and a “they” of powerful people (1%) who won the war, became more rich and more powerful by the war.

The people didn’t want war, the governments wanted war - sooner or later and more or less - because they had to want war at last.

Germany’s enemies did not primarily fight the Nazis, they primarily fighted Germany. And that was not merely an allied goal, but as well or probably more a nationalistic goal because fighting Germany was a chance to become rich, thus more powerful, namely to become the world power. Until 1945 Germany had been the one and only rival of the USA, in the matter of world power which the British Emipre had already lost during the World War I. Besides: the USSR at that time was de facto still a part of the Third World.

If the USA had not got e.g. the German technician and rocket engineer Wernher von Braun and his crew, there would never have been any landing on the moon (except a German one). Wernher von Braun was a Nazi - have you forgotten that? -, and after the World War II he was blackmailed: „either you help the USA or you will be put in prison“! His crew were also blackmailed. They all prefered to help the USA because they did not want to be jailed.

Other German scientists, technicians, engineers etc. were treated similarly - not only in the USA, but also e.g. in the USSR.

In the Second World War the powerful 1% fighted against the powerless 99%, and the powerfull 1% won - as always.

Globalism is nationalism in global dimensions. So on the one (quantitative) hand we currently have more nationalism, and on the other (qualitative) hand we currently have a different nationalism, namely a global one.

So in your thesis (“Why the Nazis actually won…”) is much truth, if you don’t separate globalism from nationalism / national-socialism because gloabism is nationalism / national-socialism in global dimensions.

Except not the kind of socialism like the germans had based on kinship feeling around common language and heritage values. Today’s global socialism has only one kinship feeling, the weak and the disinherited joining together. Nothing unites them but their shared sense of resentment at the “well-offs” and their victim culture.

Therefor “victimism” with its “victimology” is already in use.

And a nice reminder of how people before the WWII thought LIKE the Nazis…

There was a ship…
A ship with Jews…
It left Germany…
But no one accepted it…

So the ship turned back!

See http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27373131.

Just to add an intersting note to the discussion…

That’s a distortion because several hundred thousand Jews left Germany before the war. Most went to Palestine, but other countries took in thousands of refugees as well.

Do you have any references for that? (not that I seriously doubt it)

The purpose of the WW1 was to establish the nation of Israel. But those pulling the strings, as usual, screwed it up, so they had to do it again (as usual).

Yes, I have. And there are also documentary films and the fact that all these Germans came to the US in May 1945 and lived there in a city which was founded just for that reason. Google for example this: Operation Paperclip or Operation Overcast.


104 German rocket scientists (aerospace engineers): Wernher von Braun and his scientists and engineers at Fort Bliss in Texas, USA, 1945.

Operation Paperclip was the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) program in which more than 1,500 German scientists, technicians, and engineers were brought from Germany to the United States for employment after the World War II. It was conducted by the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA). In other words: It was a criminal act, one criminal act of the other crimninal acts of the greatest raid of all time.

Nearly similar is the number of the German scientists, technicians, and engineers who were brought in the Soviet Union (USSR) after the World War II.

Interesting…
Any references?

You don’t know i.e. the Balfour declaration ?

As I see it, WWII would happen sooner or later. Either by Germany or by any other nation.
The rise of eugenics, the rise of hate and nationalism, would eventually lead to that.
I am just terrified to see that the Germans at that time did not differ a lot from, e.g., Americans.
We accept nations building armies, we accept nations officially supporting racist bahaviours and when a world war errupts we are suddenly… surpsised… :wink: