Please search for another thread, if you do not like this one. If you want this thread to be derailed, then you merely Show that you are the one who insults himself.
Back to the thread:Again:
The TITLE OF MY THREAD and the TITLE OF MY OP is a [size=108]QUESTION[/size]:
[list][list][list][list][list][list][size=108]Will machines completely replace all human beings?[/size][/list:u][/list:u][/list:u][/list:u][/list:u][/list:u]
A QUESTION! A question doesn’t have to be justified by a logical implication. I did it anyway because I wanted to give an example for one of the possibilities to answer that question. If one wants to disprove my this answer, then this one can not disprove the question. A question is just a question. If one wants to givae an example for another possibility to answer that question, then this one has to give evidence as well as I have to.
My given logical implication is valid because of the fact that both premises are known - known in that way which is the usaual way of ILP (only very less threads are opened with a logical implication, for eample Gib’s one which is false because he doesn’t satisfie the logical implication truth table. It doesn’t matter, whether a logical implication is simple or not, elsewise all ancient philosophers, especially the excellent logician Aristoteles, could not be designated as philosophers. A counter argument to my argument has to be provided, for example this one: “cheaper will not replace all else”. But has any single member of this forum written such a counter argument in this thread? No! Nobody has done it. Why? There is no one.
The birthrates and fertility rates I have given in one of my posts are known and accepet worldwide. They are facts. The Population of the most african populations have grow exponentially since the last centuries. In the 1940’s they had the population of “x” and in the 1990’s they had the population “10X” - ten times more! Not an african, but a west asiatic example is Iraque: In the 1920’s Iraque had a poulation of 3 millons, 2010 Iraque had a population of 32 millions - more than ten times more! That are no quips, but facts.
When machines replace human beings there are three steps of human behaviour:
1.) they behave as usual (according to their tradition), althuogh machines make alraedy life more pleasant,
2.) they behave both as usual and according to the machines,
3.) they behave according to the the machines.
Between machines and economical welfare is always a close context, but the cultural elements are also important.
Even an auto-racist (the one who hates the own race) can not change this facts because all human beings behave in that way, at least similarly. That behaviour is a developmental (according to both evolution and history) fact.