!!!
Tor! - Goal!
I am watching football (soccer) at the moment (Spain vs. Chile). Are you also interested in that, James?
Back to your questions:
My theory is that in our universe bodies move in a spiral-cyclical way.
The orbits of both moons around their planets and the planets around their stars, and even the stars around their galactic center clearly do not describe circles or ellipses, but spirals. For example, while our Sun spirally orbits the center of our galaxy, the Earth spirally orbits the sun, and our Moon spirally orbits the Earth. For bodies that move around bodies, which also move around bodies, do not move two-, but three-dimensionally. They move spirally and thus also cyclically, more precisely said: in a spiral-cyclical way. If something moves around a body or a point which does not move around another body or point and is not moved in a different way by external forces, then (and only then) can this (and only this) motion be two-dimensional.
My whole (natural and cultural) theory is based on spiral-cyclic motions - almost all developments, thus also evolution and history.
For example: most of the “laws” of the quantum physics had been called into question before it became apparent that much of quantum physics can not be wrong because a dental drill and a cd player really work.
The f ourfundamental forces of nature should not be generally called into question, but some of the"laws" of thermodynamics, or the theory of the “big bang” and the theory of the “inflation of the universe” shoulld be called into question because there is no absolute proof or evidence, but merely laboratory experiments, statistics, modeling, and - of course - claims for them.
Affectance and spiral-cyclicity are convertible and not contradictory.
Bodies “notice” without any awareness that they are affected.