Universe and Time

It can’t be stopped. It would be like trying to form a nucleus of atomic weight 400, yet keep it from being radioactive. They would only be able to contain it, shielding from it only for a while, as long as they were not part of it, which they fully intend to be.

The “Atomic Man” is actually the current design, an “atom” design, with orbiting “particles” around a massive nucleus. But they haven’t the means to sustain the “Weak-force” which allows the two “particles” to stay distant. Assuming they don’t wake up before hand, they will all irresistibly unite. SAM comes after that point, because they are currently too focused on accomplishing their lust at all cost (billions of people).

You mean the postive and the negative particle. But what is the social metaphor for them? I guess it is the metaphor of the positive and the negative “communal particle”.

Correct.
Or in the film, The Matrix, it is the Architect and his System of Machines vs the Zionists. The film series ended with a truce between them just before the System wiped out the Zionists. But how long do truces last? Their proposed “truce” is the “Weak-force” keeping them apart.

This is the “Saturn” stage. But then they have to go through the “Jupiter” stage. Then the Black-hole… then, of what is remaining, RM:AO:SAM (aka “Me”) steps onto the stage, and a new game begins, without the Godwannabes.

I haven’t seen the film “The Matrix”. Who is the “architect” in that film? If the “system of machines” wiped out the Zionists, then there could be nor truce between them anymore. Why are you then asking how long truces last? The “Weak Force” is the force that keeps the antagonists apart. But the main effect of the “Weak Force” is the breakup, the collapse, of the particles.

Why “»Saturn« stage” and “»Jupiter« stage”? Is that meant astrologically?

“You” “are” “SAM”, and you mean the system of “SAM” because it is without the Godwannabes. Right?

You’re kidding. It is a sci-fi/fantasy film concerning (metaphorically) the contest between the Zionists (portrade as the good guys) and an ambiguous “Architect” of the “Perception Matrix” of social-mechanisms (“Machines”) utilizing people as its source of energy, who are referred to as “coppertops” (referring to the Duracell batteries). It is a serious epic production that you really shouldn’t miss.

In the second sequel of the three films, the Machines were about to overwhelm the Zionists. But the superhero, Neo, was working on a truce with the machines. At the last minute, the machines stopped because Neo accomplished his truce. The series ended with “a new day” forming.

?? I am not aware of the weak-force being involved in any breakup other than in its failure to hold a particle close to another without letting them touch. It was called a “weak” force because it weakly holds them together (electrons and nucleus). But in reality, it is the strongest force in the universe because it is impossible to overcome it such as to allow the electrons to actually meet the nucleus, regardless of impact speed.

“Saturn” represents the time when there is a huge core of society surrounded by many smaller societies, “the rings of Saturn” (similar to an atom, thus the “Atomic Man” stage. “Jupiter” represents a time when all have united into a single large society, the Globalist’s fantasy utopia. And the “Black-hole” is the time when the effort to be more efficient stitches all things tightly together into a critical mass that allows nothing to exist that isn’t a part of the “system” and allows nothing to leave the system = “Environmental Protection Agency” recycling ALL things with NO waste whatsoever.

After the “Black-hole” forms, it is seen that the only way to continue to exist as an intelligent life form, is to disperse into millions of relatively independent small anentropic families via SAM. At that stage, the entire notion of anyone wanting to be a God is well seen to be childishly naive.

No. I am not kidding.

So “Neo” was one of the Zionsts or one who helped the Zionists. Right?

But please stick to your statement (a) and to my reply (b):

You said (a): „The film series ended with a truce between them just before the System wiped out the Zionists.“.
I replied (b): „If the ›system of machines‹ wiped out the Zionists, then there could be no truce between them anymore.“
When one is wiped out, then there is no truce bewteen this one and others possible.

Wikipedia wrote:

I said “breakup”,“collaps”, Wikipaedia said “decay”. Okay?

So that is not meant astrologically, isn’t it?

So there is a way for life and even for humans beings to continue, but it is an only way. And you are the one who shows that way, right?

Watch the film. It is a serious epic production that you really shouldn’t miss.

Right. He was first merely a talented computer hacker. And just as the authorities were about to capture him, Morpheus of the Zionists saved him by bringing him out of the “System Matrix” into “the real world”, a bleak nasty world of the reality of conflicts, wars, and desolation (“the dark side of society”). He was taught how to use his talent in aiding the fight against the System Machines and became a super-hero to save the day, which he eventually accomplished by destroying a cancerous growth within the system (via becoming a part of it and revealing “the light within”).

There is something wrong with that. They do keep changing their definitions around. But I really don’t see how they associate the [now called] “electroweak force” with nuclear decay. Nuclear bonding is due to what they called (or at least used to call) the “strong force”. But that “force” (that isn’t really a force at all) becomes weak for any nucleus above a certain size. Random subtle EMR then causes the bonding to break, because in reality it is the weakest force in nature. It was originally called “the strong force” because it was associated with why protons stick together in a nucleus. I don’t know how they now associate the “electroweak force” with it. But next year it might all be different.

In reality, neither “force” actually exists (which is what allows them to redefine it as they please, I guess).

I’m not an astrologist, so I can’t really say. And speaking of films, the films 2001 and 2010 go into this issue.

“Who physically” isn’t relevant (feel free to stop focusing on me individually any time now). “I” am in body merely a messenger (one of many). It is the message that actually causes the change. SAM is the message. “You can kill me, but what I AM is eternal, because SAM is from the eternal reality that never stops revealing its messages.”

But is „Neo“ a „Zionist“ or a helper of the „Zionists“?

The current „convention“ of the physicist about the four fundamental interactions (forces) of nature is as follows:

First there was one unified force (fundamental interaction) of nature, than seceded: (1.) the gravitational interaction (a.k.a gravitational force or gravity), (2.) the strong interaction (a.k.a. strong or strong nuclear force), (3.) the weak interaction (a.k.a. weak or weak nuclear force), (4.) the electromagnetic interaction (a.k.a. electromagnetic force or electromagnetism). The latter two (3. and 4.) were one unified interaction (force) before they separately seceded: elctroweak interaction (a.k.a. electroweak force).

This secession „took place“ during the Quark era (a.k.a. Quark epoch), thus after the Planck era (a.k.a. Planck epoch).

Oh… you are talking about their theory of a “beginning time and universe”, the “Bogus Big Bang”.
… ridiculous, superstitious nonsense.

I am not talking about the “big bang”. I am talking about the “Grand Unified Theory” (“G.U.T.”) which includes the separation of the four fundamental interactions (forces) of nature from one unified interaction (force) of nature.

Well, if you are talking about the reality of the make up of the universe,
the electric potential comes first,
then electric propagation,
then magnetic “electric concentration” (together as “electromagnetic radiation”).
Then gravity (or “mass”),
then “strong force”.
Then “weak force”.

But it isn’t a time sequence. There was never a time when all of it didn’t exist at the same time.

It is more easily understood in terms of Affectance its varied density.

Yes, according to your RM:AO, but unfortunately the physicist don’t know your RM:AO.

Yeah, but they never used to know their Quantum Physics either (and would have been better off never learning it).

Why would it “have been better off never learning” the Quantum Physics?

It is misleading and erroneous, just as is Relativity, although Relativity has limited usefulness.

About the only thing good coming from QP is that it inspires education in mathematics and provides distractive and entertaining sci-fi stories (if that can be called “good”).

The question is whether Man should face the fact that the better life is NOT filled with extreme passions of love and hate, hope and fear, ideals and vulgarities, but rather “relatively” mundane ups and downs (somewhat Buddhistic).

As JSS said before: “Absolute zero is merely one divided by absolute infinity and thus cannot exist either.”

Wha is the amount of “that limited rate of adding affects”?

Noise is not possible without the electromagnetic force. But why is that clump of affectance noise and not a different “effect” of EMR? And is a particle merely a “»standing wave« of noise” and nothing else?

In what units?
In common physics, it would be measured as dV/dt, a change in volts per a change in time (seconds) or in voltage per frequency, volts/hertz. But how much is a volt? How much is a second?

Logically (or mathematically) the limit is the first order of infinity. But I can’t say that volts and seconds are on the same order of infinity. Although I can say that the change in PtA per tic, dP/dt, can never exceed infinity. Thus;

That picture shows two commonly occurring cases wherein there are an infinite number of affectance waves converging. If the average PtA level of all of them is less than 1, when they sum, the value will be;
PtA sum [size=150]<[/size] infinity * 1 = infinity.

If they converge within the same tic of time, the PtA level would be less than infinity, which can be accomplished. But if the average of all of them is greater than 1, the sun is;
PtA sum [size=150]>[/size] infinity *1 = infinity. And that cannot logically/mathematically occur.

Since the “Maximum Rate of Change”, MCR, was challenged by their summing, they must delay long enough to allow the rate of change to be less than infinite. That delay is what begins inertia and perhaps a particle.

If that MCR is challenged too often within the same close region, a particle forms;

I’m not sure what your first question is, but a particle is “nothing but noise” because there is nothing but the delaying of noise to cause a particle to form. The changing noise (“affectance” or in this case “EMR”) is all that exists.

The affects continue to attempt adding at the same location while any additional propagating affect must wait for time to pass, but why does any additional propagating affect have to wait? Is it because of the limited rate of adding affects, and if so, why is there a limited rate of adding affects, and why can’t the waiting affects not also attempt adding?

What does „Da“ in „Da-Affectance Density“ mean?

It is the “traffic jam” effect. As one gets delayed, those coming up behind it can get closer, but they end up having to wait also, just a little less. No affect can “crawl over” another or pass it. But as that is happening in the entire region around the center, more and more delaying happens, thus producing an entire field of delaying that gradually gets milder further from that center.

And all of that delaying is the make of what we call the “gravity field” or “mass field” or what RM:AO refers to as simply the “Affectance field around a concentration” (Einstein’s “rubber sheet”). The gravity field is actually made up of the electromagnetic field pulses randomly distributed and extremely small. In a sense, there is no “gravity field” that is any different than merely a chaotic and neutral electric field. Extremely fine EMR is what makes gravity and mass. What they call “mass” is merely far more concentrated random EMR pulses than its surrounding gravity field.

“Da” = “Density (of affectance)”, “D” for Density, sub-“a” for affectance (as opposed to Density of Water or Air).

Oh… and now I see what they are calling the “weak force” (what they used to call the “strong force”). Today the “strong force” is what holds quarks together and the “weak force” is what holds protons together. Those two “forces” are actually identical. And a quark isn’t actually a whole particle. :icon-rolleyes: