Official: Post a Picture of Yourself

[AutSider]

The stronger party saw agriculture mechanizing and a need for cheap labor in northern factories.
Nothing to do with equality.

Only a naive child would think such a thing.
Or a defective human, looking for hope.

So because you disagree with equality it's impossible for anybody else to seriously advocate it? Alrighty then.

[gib]

The North won, Ecc.

The South gave in.

And The North enforced equality.

The stronger party, willed equality.

-

Nice try, Manchild.

I don't get this. Are you guys talking about the confederates and the union? Is the stronger party the Republicans? And what's the difference between enforcing equality and willing it?

[Arminius]

Evil me.


Angel me.

Yes. But if you look at the pictures very carefully, you could also say that it is the reverse:

Angel me.


Evil me.

[phoneutria]

Would like to see some pictures at this point.

[Ben JS]

Ben - The Inferior

(WARNING: Naked male - Nothing rude)

untab

I'm flabby ATM. Used all my energy thinking, not moving.

I took it last night after I shared my dreams.

Calm

untab

[Arminius]

Would like to see some pictures at this point.

Which one would you like to see?

I don't know your preferences. Therefore, here are some examples:


The left person is the "good lookin' one".


Walpurgisnacht with Faust.


When posting on ILP.


Resemblance.


Abstract.


Without comment.
________________________

Which one do you like most?

[Arminius]

If there were the Olympic games for the photos of this thread, I would give the three medals to the posters of the following photos:

1) GOLD:


2) SILVER:

Because of this:

3) BRONZE:

[Ben JS]

Erik and Uncle Ben:

(I am a monetarily poor bastard who essentially owns a computer, musical instruments and a bed - One of these days, i'll have to start sharing my music - I'm trying to explain why the photos are so poor)

untab

[Ecclesiastes]

untab

What's really weird is that you were alone in a room when you took this.

[Ben JS]

It was a demonstration.

I went from anorexia to posting pictures of myself naked.

I could show more, but it'd be inappropriate.

I know what I look like naked. I don't need photos.

----

Also, you're trolling by placing that picture outside of tags.

Mags, could you edit their post and put tags around it.

I don't want people to be unwillingly exposed to my body.

[Ecclesiastes]

Such a feminine pose.

[Ben JS]

A male being feminine is often criticized.

I am provoking the insecurities of others.

[Ecclesiastes]

Do you think your feminine nature triggered your abuse?

[Ben JS]

It would attract pedophiles, yes.

A child is innocent. An adult, not so.

----

I was a catch for any pedo.

Cute, feminine, and handicapped.

[Ecclesiastes]

A child is innocent. An adult, not so.

Nobody born with a mouth to feed is innocent.

I was a catch for any pedo.

Cute, feminine, and handicapped.

Have you ever had sex with a man, apart from your abuser?

[Ben JS]

No.

I am attracted to women.

-

If you genuinely want to talk to me, we can do it in PM.

I don't want to derail the thread.

[Ecclesiastes]

No.

I am attracted to women.

Are you sure about that?

[If you genuinely want to talk to me, we can do it in PM.

I don't want to derail the thread.

No interest in private conversations.

[Ben JS]

Take your questions of me to another thread then.

I'm not going to answer until you do so.

Stop derailing.

====

Update:

Ecc is being dishonest.

Has no interest in me beyond ad hom.

Attacking the messenger, not the message.

I posted pictures and answered questions relating to the pictures.

Others launched an attack. This thread isn't for verbal conflict.

Ecc's antics are obvious.

[Ecclesiastes]

Take your questions of me to another thread then.

I'm not going to answer until you do so.

Stop derailing.

Sorry.
I seem to have touched a nerve.

[Ecclesiastes]

Update:

Ecc is being dishonest.

Has no interest in me beyond ad hom.

Attacking the messenger, not the message.

I posted pictures and answered questions relating to the pictures.

Others launched an attack. This thread isn't for verbal conflict.

Ecc's antics are obvious.

What attack?
You've been spamming the forum with your personal information.

Now you get super sensitive after a few questions regarding your sexuality?

[MagsJ]

I will split this conversation into another thread...

[Mr Reasonable]

Good move. Might as well start it off in rant.

[phoneutria]

Anyway.... Here is a picture of some handsome fellows.

[Arminius]

I see. Is that the picture you like most?

The following picture shows the first (1911) of that conferences:



1. Walther Nernst
2. Robert Goldschmidt
3. Max Planck
4. Marcel Brillouin
5. Heinrich Rubens
6. Ernest Solvay
7. Arnold Sommerfeld
8. Hendrik Antoon Lorentz
9. Friedrich Lindemann
10. Maurice de Broglie
11. Martin Knudsen
12. Emil Warburg
13. Jean-Baptiste Perrin
14. Friedrich Hasenöhrl
15. Georges Hostelet
16. Édouard Herzen
17. James Jeans
18. Wilhelm Wien
19. Ernest Rutherford
20. Marie Curie
21. Henri Poincaré
22. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes
23. Albert Einstein
24. Paul Langevin

[phoneutria]

Here is a picture of an eye.