Will machines completely replace all human beings?

From whom (human/s) or what (machine/s) have you got that numbers?

Golem.de: "Roboter - Mensch: fast 1:1 " (“robot - human: almost 1:1”), that means at least 7 billion robotics ( :exclamation: :astonished: :exclamation: ).

Just web searches, such as Number of cars in the world. No telling where they got their numbers.

And Ask.com, right?

I didn’t do an exhaustive search. I just picked a couple that first sprang up. The others that I could see didn’t seem to disagree. If you want an accurate count, you have to ask the question with far more detail. “Machines” is too ambiguous of a word. Do iPhones count as computers? Hell, I don’t know and it isn’t worth finding out.

It is a pity that there is still no real census of machines, no real counting of machines.

The reproduction rate of humans is currently at 1.25. And the reproduction rate of the machines?

Post from another thread:

If the sense of history will be lost, then it will make no sense to have history at all, because there will be no one who knows anything about both the sense of history and the history itself. There will be no historian, no one who knows what history and ist sense is, probably even no one with a sense for the meaning of the past for both the present and the future.

If history will totally become also a part of a modern ideology like any other cultural phenomeneon, then it will be merely part of a religious system, although a modern one, and no longer be its own system - provided that some other historical existentials will also be lost -, so the ideological (modern religious) system and its language (media) will be able then to “sweep” history under the ideological (modern religious) “carpet” and afterwards nnihilate it. That will be done, if the chance will be there - certainly. We have been seing this bad development because it has been becoming more and more obvious. Interestingly it has been having a correlation with the modern development of the machines and all the other modern developments. Thus: amongst others the machines are strongly involved in that process.

Machines that make other machines or themselves
or machines made by humans?

If humanity continues doing what it is doing, they will simply write a new history now and then in order to give that “sense of history” significance. Socialist regimes require a cause to be fighting for and against (manufactured terrorism). And that cause cannot be viewed as never changing, else there is no perceived hope. So a new history that presents the idea of “hope on the horizon” has to be written and instilled into the minds of people from time to time = revolving history.

Speaking of nobility, The SAM Corp. is the very peak of nobility. Nobility doesn’t get any higher.

Nobility is an issue of trustability or reliability. The Nobles can trust each other, but to do what? The SAM Corp brings trustability far above historical barriers and exposes all agendas.

The SAM Corp is too Noble for most noblemen.

Both machines that make other machines or themselves and machines made by humans.

A “new history” can also be no history, but merely a so called one, i.o.w. an ideological (modern religious) myth, a mythological propaganda.

Too noble? If so, that would be a good omen, wouldn’t it?

I estimate that the reproduction rate of the machines is about 10. :astonished:

Good and bad. They fight against what they can’t measure up to, just as the lower class fights the upper class, and for the same reasons. But the fact that it displays its nobility for all to see makes it hard for the lesser nobility to deny it.

And if you are going to count the nanobots, the machine count would be in the trillions and the reproduction rate maybe around million:one.

The real ( :wink: ) upper class wants the other two classes (middle and lower class) to fight each other - according to the motto: “DIVIDE ET IMPERA”.

Yes, or even more.

Depends on what you call “real”.
Noble means “pure, uncorrupted”. So on the level that I am talking about, being a King doesn’t necessarily mean that you are noble.

In order to be an upper class the upper class does not have to be “noble”, but an upper class.

Armedrobots.com:

“Robots Have Begun Writing the News.”

“Mini Humanoid Robots Starting to Walk More Like People.”

“Humans Are Programmed to Obey Robots.”

“Robots With Machine Guns, Robotic Pack Mules.”

“The Ethics of War Bots.”

“New Algorithm Detects Humans with near 100% Accuracy.”

AND SO ON …

It is a game that is already over. You are just watching it being played out. Think of it as visiting the past in order to have first hand witness to what it was like, when homosapians thought they owned the Earth.