Not sure which is the better option here Atheris… being wanted for ones looks or for ones money… what should someone want us for? If both parties are on an equal footing looks-wise it seems right to me, so… as Goldilocks would say, it’s about things being just right.
So, people are hated if they possess looks and/or riches? riiiiiight.
Based on my pics hes positive. Not much of a philosopher are we erik? Thats just a bad inference. Besides, i got more ass than a toilet seat in college and i was broke as shit. Besides that, i dont date broke women.
Neither looks nor money should be the only reason if a person is interested in a serious relationship. If not, it doesn’t matter anyway.
I’d say going for looks is less shallow, as physical attraction is a prerequisite of any healthy relationship.
“I’m not sure if you’re the right guy for me, can I see your penis? takes a ruler out of pocket Mr.Bean style, measures the penis . Sorry, I like you and all but you’re half an inch short.”
Yeah - I’m back. The whole going away thing was part of a certain scheme of mine, that I disregarded —Satyr knows what I’m talking about.
Kryptocunt, or however you spell you’re name…you seem like you are, most likely, a tweaker. I’m basing that off your erratic and eccentric writings and other crack-head like peculiarities.
I wouldn’t know darl… I’ve never been with a man for his money and I’m not up for being manipulated (it’s a massive turn off don’t you think?) so the money only option wouldn’t work for me, which leaves the looks/looks&money options.
But even with the last option, the moneyed-person can still think the other is with them for their money regardless of both being lookers…
You could be manipulated either way, it’s just easier with money.
Which means what? That using money as a tool of manipulation wouldn’t work as easily? True, but the question was: what would you rather be used for–money or looks?