That post contains no philosophical or scientific argument. There was no reason to use Jakobās surname. Your purpose must have been to suggest that you have personal information about him which you are prepared to reveal.In other words, you were trying to intimidate him.
If that had been some kind of pristine debate, you might be able to construct an argument concerning my possible intent. But the nonsense, non-philosophy had been going on for pages.
And revealing information that is intended to be used against someone kind of defeats such a purpose. If I wanted to intimidate, why not just whisper it to him?
Another example of the level of debate on that forum and by one of the same crew just now;
Yes, James lies and personal accusations had been going on for that whole thread, not to mention his whole stay on this board. Therefore it was okay for him to reveal my name.
Itās called āboiling frog syndrome.ā
Ben has been trolling me for about half a year as well now. Heās not as clever as James, but heās as persistent.
Once again, and forever, never any evidence, no actual content argument, merely accusations against a āchosen enemyā. For a philosophy site to be nothing but people accusing others is really, really sad/ridiculous - utterly childish.
And the mods are supporting and inspiring it all the way ā¦ easy to deduce to be their intent.
The mods have probably perceived how faithfully I was dedicated to understanding and supporting you for some years. Many young posters will simply believe your absurdly blatant lies by the principle of āthe greater the lie, the more it will be believedā. If one can also be feel righteous anger at a philosopher who poses them challenges, why would they care to remember the post he made less than a day ago.
And now, so are/do you. That is how easy it gets going. The question is, who starts merely attacking someone instead of defending or questioning a hypothesis? Once someone is attacked, it either merely stops totally or drifts into ad homs.
I could ask the same of you (or Bigus).
The question isnāt why am I here. The question is why is this site here? If it presumes no purpose, then it collects nothing but the most childish, ranting, faggoting social scourge. Having a purpose means having a direction for moderating decisions. When decisions arenāt made, it means there is no purpose, no direction, no āsoulā. Why call it āPhilosophyā at all?
Philosophy implies a reasoning behind a thought that can be supported with other reasonings. āI wanna Believeā is not a reason. āYour an idiot!!ā is not a reason. āThat guy is the Devil. Never listen to anything he says!!ā is not a reason. āOh!! I am OFFENDED!!ā is not a reason. Yet those are about the most common responses given ā¦ because that is what is accepted, un-moderated.
At every turn, one always has the option of coming to sense and seeking mutual understanding. If you cannot will that end at this point in time, my recommendation is to stop talking and campaigning against each other until you can. Nothing can be gained except a political (PR) kind of victory and easy friends.
How I wish for you Wizard to go deep deep deep into the saints holy theory of affectance which equals existence, for years and years until its genius begins to dawn on you!! That would make me tremendously happy. Same for all who question my intentions.
Please just be honest and DO IT.
Perhaps there are some thirteen year olds here that ive addressed as adults. Of course the stopped clock thread isnt for children.
Go at it! Love James!! Also: do please deeply scorn me and value ontology. It is time for the camps to assemble abd the lines to be drawn.
Since Saint is here on this site the decay he speaks of has been perceivable. He has by far the most posts of anyone and all are made in this period of decay. It proves he is a good man, and honest to the bone. Trust him. TRUST JAMES S SAINT. Revile value ontology. Please do. It is not for you. It is bad for you. Yours is RM.
It is yours to engage. Stop being an absolute coward; wizard mithus and all those who cuddle up to James without looking him in the eye.
JSS - what was your reason behind using Jakobās surname, given that heās never used it here, nor that anyone else has used it, and given the tone of your post?
Jakob,
you can call me as many names as you like. You canāt provoke me, because I perceive you as an unstable person who has obviously a problem with himself. Thatās not my business.
I donāt need to defend James by attacking your VO. That is currently your method, not mine (and also not Jamesā, btw.).
All what counts for me is that you didnāt show the slightest evidence for your claims and insults. And nothing of that what you showed explains your rage. You turned a personal issue into a public issue, now you play the role of the victim. And you can be sure of the gleefully support of all those brave people, who always wanted to attack James but didnāt dare to do it by themselves. Well done, you work for the media, right?
And Jakob, Iād rather have a āsmall mindā which is reasonably straight than having a big brain whose parts donāt seem to cooperate at times.
[size=150]CARLEAS!!![/size]
I never asked a mod to put the words CRACK DEALER under my username!!!
Who else has the ability to change my profile here ???
I want to have this cancelled immediately.