Will there be war in Europe before 2050?

It cannot be Europe, conceivably , since Europe is now unified. Civil war, may not occur in a union which is patterned after the USA, because the presedent cause of civil war in the U.S. has, for all practical purposes laid the groundwork for the causes, therewith. I do not think, in the event of a call for disunion, or secession, that political means be not found.

Civil war > regular war

You mean “worst”, “most horrible” and “most terrible” could also mean “productive” and “positive”?

Is it really unified? :wink:

“You mean “worst”, “most horrible” and “most terrible” could also mean “productive” and “positive”?”

You did not see the word Or at the beginning of my post???

The word “or” must and does have always a reference, and there are often different references possible.

So please tell me why you think that every civil war is “productive” and “postitive”.

Technically every war is a civil war, between humans at least.

Wars are not always civil wars. The distinction makes sense. Do you not think so?

Not all but, most. Civil development, from such horror and pain a social memory develops which often improves that society. What is the oldest known surviving society?

If you agree to the statement that the “societies” of the Stone Age can be called “societies”, then I say that the oldest “surviving societies” are those who lived in the Stone Age. But I guess you mean the later societies. Before I answer your question in that way, I have to know what you exactly mean by “surviving societiy”. Do you mean a unit of culture or a nation? Nation would be difficult because it is only an occidental, a modern occidental concept.

Of course some Eastern-European country that probably doesn’t exist yet will attack some other Eastern-European country that doesn’t exist yet, sometime in the next 35 years. They hardly ever stop.

I mean any uninvaded or overturned(civil war) unit, we can say culture if you wish. Anyone that has survived to date peacefully.
Stone age???

No, I do not wish that.

There is [size=140]no[/size] one - accept perhaps that one that has survived because of a Stone Age life style.

Yes, Stone Age.

Civil war is only productice in that it absorbs the hostility within borders and does not extend it outside of it. I am fairly surer, that international causes co conflict, causing intra national strife between groups n general grounds, will most certainly directed at ‘outside’ sources of intrusive agitation. This has usually been the case, with prior wars, eneemies were found outside, so as to releive the pressure from internal resposnible authority. This is i voted no, because like in the present conflict, for example Germany’s heavily populated Arab extreme groups, those people will certainly be exyended to such groups’ original pre emigration places of origin. Just like in the US, after the Pearl Harbor attack, Japanese Americans were interned into camps to contain their suspected agression due to perceived divided loyalties.

“Germany’s heavily populated Arab extreme groups”? Okay, there are also some in Germany, but most of them are in France, Belgium, Netherland, and of course England.

You can call it “West Eurpoe’s heavily Arab extreme groups”. Maybe that in the future some European countries will have more heavily Arab extreme groups than the current European countries I mentioned. This thread is about war in the future of Europe till 2050.

Maybe Europe should approach Russia. I am not sure, but what do you think about that?

Well, that might be a small part of the aborigines in Australia. No where else.
All, or majority of societies evolve, change or fail. The common binding element is not peace but, struggle. Comfort breeds or bred most downfalls one way or another, internal or external.

Arminius, Germany has the largest Arab population after France.

No, Obe. That’s not right. The largest Arab population has France. That is right.

And b.t.w.: If we talk about the danger of war, which is the theme in this thread, then we have to consider the Arab or Islamic population per head. Per head!

And small parts in Amazonia, Central Africa, Papua New Guinea; and due to the fact that they are small parts, the probability that they will survive is even higher.

If their jungles will not completely be cut down, then they will probably have the best chances to survive the global holocaust.

Okay, let’s go back to the title of this thread: Will there be war in Europe before 2050? We are talking about the following area (especially the green coloured one):

No, Germany does not have the largest Arab Population of the EU. France, UK, the Netherlands (Dutchland), and Belgium have the most. Or do you not mean “Arab” but “Islamic”. If so, then it is again France, not Germany, but in that case Germany is the second or third Country with the most Islamic immigrants (b.t.w.: thank you for them, Israel and USA!).

The Slavic (slavish) nations with their nationalism and Nazism, of course. But do they really belong to Europe? There is not much nationalism and not much latent nationalism in Old-Europe. The globalistic media lies but has the medial power over all humans, especially the Occidental humans. The globalistic rulers and their media functionaries want the US and other people to think that Europe is evil - it is somehow similar to the situation just before and during the two World Wars -, otherwise they could not so easily reach their goals. I want you to not believe what your corrupted government and your media is saying to you. We don’t want any war, and you don’t want any war. But do you know the facts about the port of Havanna, about the Lusitania, about Pearl Harbor, about the Gulf of Tanking, about the Twin Towers?

No, because that is what your media tells you: lies. What you call the “yesterday’s Hamburg demonstration” was a demonstration of the rulers and their functionaries. It was not against Islamic terror - the reverse is true.

Again a “charge against Sloterdijk’s genetic theory”? Really? Again?