Medical science enables us to grasp objectively why women become pregnant. And it enables doctors to perform abortions based on an objective knowledge of human biology as it pertains to terminating a pregnancy.
But when it comes to pinning down precisely when, after conception, the unborn becomes a “human being”, science seems unable to determine beyond all doubt when this is. And they certainly seem unable to determine if abortion either is or is not moral.
Of course there are folks like Sam Harris who insist that science is able to determine this. But I don’t share his point of view. As I have noted on other threads.
But how is this demonstrated beyond all doubt other than by way of you insisting that you believe this to be the case “in your head”?
You have the objective scientific fact and you apply it. Are you saying that the science cannot be demonstrated beyond all doubt? Beyond reasonable doubt?
No, what we have is you insisting that the “scientific facts” from your link, in being in alignment with your own moral convictions, have been demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt. What we don’t have is you demonstrating that the “scientific facts” from my link are necessarily wrong.
Okay, is your God being detached when particular women choose to abort their babies? Is your God being objective?
There either is or there is not a Judgment Day pertaining to your God. And you either are or not in accordance with the will of God here when you maintain that women who abort their babies before the 22nd week, are acting in a completely moral manner.
Does or does not this opinion of yours matter to God?
There you go again. You are unable to break up the problem and look at the smaller parts. You keep sticking Judgement Day in there .
There you go again, avoiding the need to actually answer my questions by insisting that only you get to say if I am entitled to even raise them.
From my point of view, once one has committed himself to a particular denominational God, it is absurd to imagine that He can be excised from a discussion that revolves around the extent to which our moral agendas are said to be either true objectively or merely rooted subjectively in dasein.