Im allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch ist ‘es’ doch ‘it’. Und, ich sage dass ich es auch oft in Psychoanalyse so gelesen habe. Wie gesagt: es ist möglich dass ich es nicht ganz richtig mehr erinnere. Es ist schon einige Jahre her.
Kennst du seine Werke?
Ja Natürlich, aber als er da fällt, ist es möglich dass er seinen Hals bricht. Solle ich nicht passieren lassen natürlich!
Das war mir nicht deutlich wie viel du weisst davon.
Aber immer noch mit kleinen Schritten.
Mein Deutsch ist vielleicht nicht sehr gut. Ich brauche es nicht oft. Es ist auch nicht meine erste Sprache. Englisch is auch nicht meine erste Sprache. So spriche ich noch enige Sprache. Jedemfalls: entschuldige vor den Fehler.
Vielleicht. Manche Gedanken habe ich ja schon erzählt. Die anderen Gedanken werden folgen.
Deshalb schrieb ich “Fachsprache Freuds”. Der Unterschied zwischen “Es” und “es” ist im Deutschen gegeben, aber im Englischen nicht mehr: “it” und “it”. Um den Unterschied auch im Englischen deutlich machen zu können, hat man einen Unterschied erfunden: “id” und “it”.
Wohl nicht mehr so sehr wie früher - “dank” Internet u.ä…
Id = The person’s actual impulses (instincts and passions). Ego = What the person believes he can do, given the constraints of reality (self-confidence, self-image, harmonizing w/ perceived reality). Superego = What the person believes he should do, given the constraints of society (repression, social-image, harmonizing w/ society).
All societies require a degree of repression via social rules. SAM brings the id, ego, and the superego together so that each can easily comply with the others to the maximum degree possible. What a person desires to do becomes what he can actually accomplish as well as what he socially should do. That is how the IJOT gets maximized because Joy is the inner perception of unimpeded accomplishment.
I am of the modest opinion that if Laughing Moron was thrown into the wild he would have been eaten by a terrifying monster of some terrible sort thus proving his point that living in the wild, at least as far as turds such as himself are concerned, is superior to living in the civilization. One thing however is left unanswered and that is why does he not go down the line of Christopher McCandless? Dude, just pick a gun, and into the fucking wild!
Just stop! You’re hurting my feelings already! You’ve got be me confused with one of my past cyber incarnations buddy when I was flirting philosophically with Anarcho Primitivism. Since then my stances have changed on a variety of philosophical issues.
At any rate, there is no need to go to the wilderness considering the wilderness is going to come to civilization or modern society soon enough when the great disintegration, entropy, and collapse arrives.
As for me, don’t worry about me. I’m sure my odds of survival are going to be ten times more better than yours little fella. Take care now.
I sometimes think to myself we were better off in our animalistic form, yes.
I also rather fatalistically think to myself there is simply no going back where a collapse scenario will more than likely wipe us out in a global extinction style event.
A few survivors? Not anymore. A quick glance at thermonuclear reactors around the world along with nuclear weapon stockpiles in the case of global war would pretty much guarantee there wouldn’t be anybody left.
I am a firm believer in what I like to describe as the inherent doom and self destruction of human beings. Haven’t seen anything contrary to it and now we finally have the means to do it globally.
China will invent radiation proof giant glow in the dark war condoms.
People fully understand how to treat radioactive materials.
It’s as if it is natural, now.
We’re the only animal with nukes. That means we are better than them.
We, the powerful humans, and power is the only thing that matters, even though it can cause a shit ton of death and unhappinesss.