That is a false quotation. You should quote my text correctly, Phoneutria. I said (see above): “… that does not always prove or disorove the real fitness.” So I do not claim or demand a prove or a disprove, the reverse is the case: the Darwinists and nobody else have to prove or disprove, if they want their theory to be accepted. If the Darwinists want their theory to be accepted, then it is up to them to prove or to disprove. And if it is not possible to prove or to disprove a theory, then this theory has nothing to do with science.
Who said that there was a “fitness in present time that is above all others”?
The knowledge of “the fittest” can almost always also not happen after the fact. You contradict yourself. First you say “there’s no ‘proving the real fitness’”, then you say “knowledge of ‘the fittest’ can only happen after the fact”.
I understand “proving” and “knowledge” in a scientific sense here.
Nobody really knows “the fittest”. There are too many parameters.
No. Maybe that you “follow to the obvious conclusion that intelligence is the greatest indicator of fitness”. But I do not:
I said: “not the only one”. Did you not notice that?
If there is fitness, then there must be indicators of fitness, otherwise the concept of “fitness” can never be taken seriously.
The excuse of the Darwinists is, for example, that “fitness is more than fitness”. So they do not want to be taken seriously.
Yeah. Do you consider cockroaches as “the fittest”?
Again: Nobody really knows “the fittest”, Phoneutria.
One can only say after some facts that this or that living being “fitted”. There are some indicators of fitness, as I already said, but in some cases (for example in the case of the human “social selection”) this indicators can also be used as if they were indicadors of unfitness.
The Darwinistic “fitness” concept is problematic, the Darwinistic “selection principle” is partly false, and that includes the possibility of being totally false but also being partly right. I would like to save the right parts of that theory, because I think that it is going to be completely eliminated, if nobody will have eliminated its false parts in order to save its right parts.