The One Field – Affectance
The following is a thesis concerning the physical field called “Affectance” void of the extensive logical and mathematical proofs and experimental evidence involved in substantiating the assertions mentioned. Before getting into the far more detailed and rigid substantiation of the truth of what is being asserted, it is important to understand the scope of what is being asserted.
Affectance
The two primary fields spoken of in contemporary physics are the electromagnetic and the gravitational. Thus far, these have been accepted as fundamental fields that determine the behavior of all physicality. And as fundamental fields, no explanation is offered as to their make or composition. I propose, with very serious certainty, that both of these fields as well as all forms of mass are actually composed of the same more fundamental substance, Affectance.
Affectance is the physical substance from which all physicality is formed. It can be apply described in more contemporary terms as a field of ultra-minuscule to infinitesimal electromagnetic pulses with varied degrees of random directionality. Such affectance fills literally all space and is the make of all mass, light, EMR, and gravitational fields. And in fact, without such affectance, there could be no space or mass at all.
What we call “empty space” is in fact never actually fully empty – never. Much like the speculated aether field, the affectance field fills literally all space from the most infinitesimal to the most infinite. It is impossible for space to exist void of being filled completely with affectance. And the proposed “aether field” was actually affectance, merely misunderstood.
The proposed aether field was defined long ago as a substance acting as the medium within which all particles and EMR travel. But the actual affectance field is not such a separate medium for other things to travel through. The affectance field has merely greater and lesser concentrations from the extremely thin, called “space”, to the extremely concentrated, called “mass particles” or simply “mass”. In fact, one could properly refer to mass as merely “concentrated or extremely dense space”.
The density of affectance ranges from 0 to 1 ad (“affectance-density”), or from 0% to 100% adp, wherein the idealized asymptotes, 0 and 1, cannot actually ever manifest but represent absolute zero density and absolute pure, maximum density. The gravitational field, or “mass field”, is the typical gradient spread of affectance from the highest possible affectance density at the center of a mass particle (normalized to 1 ad), following a normalized Lorentzian distribution,
ad = 1 / (1 + (x² + y² + z²) ,
to the extreme distant and minimum density of open space. And it is the natural behavior of affectance that causes the aberrant effect that we refer to as “gravity”.
The distinction between the composition of the gravitational field and electromagnetic field is formed merely by the degree of directional randomness of the infinitesimal EMR pulses that make up the affectance field. When there is a high degree of directional randomness of the pulses, a gravitational field, or “mass field”, is formed. When there is a much lower degree of directional randomness, an electromagnetic field, EMR wave, or light photon is formed.
The Composition of Mass
There are merely two essential behaviors of affectance that by consequence yield the entire range of all physical properties; when ultra-minuscule EMR pulses (tiny portions of affectance) cross each other’s path, they add to each other’s density [1] and they also retard each other’ propagation. The combination of these properties forms what is mislabeled as an “attraction system” wherein concentrations of affectance grow exponentially to a maximum, forming a highly dense mass particle and maintaining that particle’s size even though the pulses are constantly coming and going through that tiny concentrated bit of space, the particle.
It is important to understand that a mass particle is merely a spot in the affectance field, or space, that is sharply more concentrated than the rest of the field. The particle is not a separate substance or object from the space around it other than merely being of greater density than the ambient surroundings. The particle does not “emit a gravitational field” as is so often taught. It would actually be more appropriate to say that the gravitational field forms the mass particle. If the field was removed, the particle would dissipate as if to completely vanish as its more internal affectance randomly and undetectably dispersed.
That concept is important when considering how mass particles move, why they move as they do, and what happens to the gravitational field as they are moving.
[1] Affectance addition: Ad = (Ad0 + Ad1) / (1 + Ad0*Ad1)
The Motion of Mass
When the affectance is uniformly flowing into and out of a mass particle in all directions, the particle will not be moving (relative to the observer). And the only way to get it to move is to alter that condition.
There are only two ways to cause a (neutrally charged) mass particle to begin to move; imbalance the density of the ambient affectance field and/or bias the average direction of the ambient field’s flow.
Gravitation
When the ambient field surrounding a mass particle is not fully symmetric, the amount of affectance flowing in and out of the particle on one side will be greater than on the opposite side. Because the particle is merely somewhat of a traffic jam of such flowing, the epicenter of the particle will shift toward the greater density. Such shifting or migrating yields the impression of a small solid object, the particle, being attracted toward the greater density. And that migrating is more commonly known as “gravitating”.
When two mass particles are in close proximity, each is surrounded by a more dense affectance field than open space. And between the two particles the affectance density adds, much like having two crowds of dancing people close to each other, the space between will have a greater density than the space outside.
The fact that the affectance density is higher between the two particles is what causes them to begin migrating toward each other. There is no force pushing or pulling at a distance as proposed by Newton, nor is space “bent” as proposed by Einstein. If anything, one could claim that space is more concentrated surrounding and between the particles, meaning that the affectance of which space is made is more dense surrounding the particles.
And of course as the particles become closer, the field between them becomes even more asymmetrically dense, thus they naturally migrate faster. Their insistence on migrating is what yields the impression that there is a mystical force involved, know as “gravitational force”, reaching out and pulling the particles together.
What is commonly called “gravitational force” would be more appropriately referred to as the “Attractive Migration”. Masses are not being pulled together, nor pushed together, but rather merely migrate closer to which ever direction represents the more dense affectance of the ambient space.