This puts me at about 60.
I haven’t gotten past 22 
I’ll be sending this to my friend in Pakistan… he’ll love it 
What are - according to the opening post of this thread - gays and lesbians, “shemales” and “hefemales” then? Pakistani immigrants and immigrants in Pakistan? 
Or, Israel rather wants to be considered as Great Britain in the eyes of the others.
With love,
Sanjay
Why you and Kris are so eager to become a senior citizen?
With love,
Sanjay
Well, that old Sikkh gentleman seems to be an exceptional case.
With love,
Sanjay
No. They are like modern US.
no attachment from the past and no expectations from the future also. It is good in some ways but bad also in more ways.
With love,
Sanjay
That does not follow as a conclusion from your opening post.
First of all, i already mentioned that those conclusions are not mine. I am just reporting those.
Having said that, i still do not think i sidestepped from the OP.
with love,
sanjay
They are like non industrialized nations, having to make do with what nature gave them.
Naah, I never cared how others see me. You either like me or not. I care how I see myself wether I like me. And I do not see myself as a Senior at only 52. Junior sure, 
.
My original post was jest BTW.
At 52, you are still one year senior than me.
Having said that, I never get the feeling that I am old, at least till now. Though, I certainly feel maturity in me now.
With love,
Sanjay
I was just saying this: “That does not follow as a conclusion from your opening post.” Not more. I was merely referring to your statement in the opening post and nothing else. With humor. So, to me, it was just irrelevant whether you or another person originally mentioned what you wrote in the opening post. What I wanted to know from you was the answer to the question (in other words) : Why US and not Pakistan?
I meant *I haven’t gotten past 22.
My male friend in Pakistan agreed with the last line, but he wasn’t happy about it 
This kind of categorizing is a nigh-perfect reflection of the mentality of modern society where femininity is celebrated and the little masculinity that is left is ostracized and tried to be made ashamed of itself.
Yes, women are wildly beautiful after 70.
Yes, men are ruled by nuts, all men are so simple and base and controlled by their sexuality they can be summed up in one short sentence about their simpleness and baseness and submission to their genitals.
Females are so mysterious and complex and beautiful and intelligent and everything else virtuous, while males are not.
Imagine if the reverse happened: 10 lines celebrating men and masculinity and one line reducing women to simple, base sexual objects?
What would be the response?
My guess is, THIS:
The writing was done in humor, jest, tongue in cheek, not to be taken seriously. Its not flattering to either gender but, done with humor to both.
You know, I wouldn’t even mind it if it was GOOD humour. But females don’t have a sense of humour, they never had to develop one because they never had problems with attaining popularity or seducing males.
It’s so unfunny that it seems to me that no real effort was put in the humour part, as if the primary intention was to celebrate women and shit on men. Whatever.
It’s not funny when you look at the bigger picture, and start to notice all the pervasive and subtle ways men are constantly mocked, put down, the subject of jokes and of anger and classified as idiots. We have vilified the male, and made him look like an pansy and an idiot, to further the “feminism” that is so highly regarded in our culture. We do it on TV and in the media, we are constantly celebrating the female and are not noticing that less men are going to college and finishing. Men actually feel the weight of all of it because the constant bombardment makes them feel like trying to be a better man is futile, and he should just accept his role as the clown in his family unit, in his work and most certainly in his society.
Feminists often make the mistake of valuing their equality over that of the male, belittling him and punishing him for the sins of their fathers. They often mistake paternalism for being “Male” driven because of the name but in today’s society that is certainly not the case. It is the female who general makes a rule of hard paternalism before a male, in order to protect and shelter those she feels are weaker because, of course, she is the only one who understand what it means to be oppressed (according to her).
We are oppressive of men now, we label them and make unwarranted assumptions about their intentions and their being before we have even gotten to know them. It’s unfair and unjust.
Oh when those tables have turned 