Anarchist Nihilism

I equate nature with nihilism separate from human artifices. No problem there.

Everything starts out as a state of mind before it is put into action. It starts as a germ of thought and then evolves.

I don’t have to do much of anything as all the government social orders of the world currently are destroying civilization faster than any anarchist could. No, individuals like me only need to wait for that one moment of vulnerability and weakness around the world then strike. A smart individual never risks getting arrested. Only a fool does that.

It amuses me that my thoughts bug you so much that you felt the need to come in here and try to insult me.

It pleases me that my thoughts or beliefs make you feel uncomfortable.

Do you have anything else to add here?

If you think making value judgements equates to being insulting you are very much mistaken. Your thoughts do not bother me
at all as I do not let what others think affect me and you are no different. In fact I have yet to come across a single thing you
have said that could bother me. Your absolutist language however does betray an ignorance of both psychology and of history
I know you are not listening for I have told you this before. But that is entirely up to you. I am merely making the observation

Too funny. :laughing:

Anarchist nihilism is the destruction of idle philosophy, the negation of idealism, the negation of mythology, and the destruction of perplexity along with the disingenuous despots that profit from it as the monopolist interpreters of artificial confusion. Therefore, Nihilism’s definitions are:

  1. When conditions in the social organization are so unhealthy as to make destruction desirable for its own sake independent of any constructive program or possibility.

  2. A doctrine of skepticism coupled with reduction that refutes faith, teleology, arbitrary morality, sacred values and principles, heresy, blasphemy, and similar beliefs while maintaining that existing political, social, and economic institutions based on these beliefs must be destroyed.

  3. A methodology for a biologically-based existence that rejects arbitrary morality in favor of cause and effect and inviolate forces, predicated upon that which is objectively self-evident and without need of belief, within a sustainable mental and physical environment that promotes independent thinking and critical expression.

Anarchist nihilism is the destruction of idle philosophy, the negation of idealism, the negation of mythology, and the destruction of perplexity along with the disingenuous despots that profit from it as the monopolist interpreters of artificial confusion. Therefore, Nihilism’s definitions are:

  1. When conditions in the social organization are so unhealthy as to make destruction desirable for its own sake independent of any constructive program or possibility.

  2. A doctrine of skepticism coupled with reduction that refutes faith, teleology, arbitrary morality, sacred values and principles, heresy, blasphemy, and similar beliefs while maintaining that existing political, social, and economic institutions based on these beliefs must be destroyed.

  3. A methodology for a biologically-based existence that rejects arbitrary morality in favor of cause and effect and inviolate forces, predicated upon that which is objectively self-evident and without need of belief, within a sustainable mental and physical environment that promotes independent thinking and critical expression.

[An aristocrat!] who advocated the self determination of peasants and working class some 200 years ago. What is wrong with this picture? First of all, that it should be, of all people, a nobleman - what an irony! Second, the standard of living has improved a lot in the last 200 years. An average person has a lot more freedoms and luxuries than ever before (maybe even a little too much). 200 years ago, they didn’t even have flushing toilets or antibiotics - things that we take for granted today. Heck, today, even illegal immigrants have a shot at good life! What government oppression are you talking about?

P.S.: So why aren’t you out there helping the refugee invasion like your fellow anarchists are doing all over?

No Borders at Union Square Rally
youtube.com/watch?v=-u4zxei5J7E
British Anarchists Help Migrants Storm Channel Tunnel
dailymail.co.uk/news/article … unnel.html
Activists and Refugees at French Border
youtube.com/watch?v=r2jwy4gzYT0
Greek Anarchists welcome refugees in Lesbos
youtube.com/watch?v=x0CBRuMrqzg

I have nothing in common with mainstream anarchists and for you to lump me up with them just shows your ignorance Pandora. Believe it or not I despise all mainstream anarchist groups and that should of been obvious if you took the time to read my original post of this thread.

If you even bothered reading my thread Nihilistic Interpretations On Racism And Multiculturalism you would know that I have nothing but disdain for government enforced multiculturalism or multiracialism concerning integration practices.

Let that take you off your ignorant high horse a notch.

I’m not a Marxist, communist, liberal, or even a capitalist for that matter. Your attempts at labeling me such is infantile and futile.

Government oppression doesn’t exist? :laughing: Standard of living has improved for who?

Such a simplistic view of hierarchy. How embarrassing for you.

So what do you do now? Just wait for the apocalypse, attend prepper meetings and subscribe to Survival magazines?

Tsk, tsk. You sound quite unappreciative, you know. Why don’t you visit a local history museum and see how your ancestors have lived comparatively? The problem is not with the standards of living but with an attitude.

Was I trying to impress? Is this what you’re all about? Getting attention and approval?
How does the concept of ‘embarrassment’ even fit into your paradigm to justify you using it?

The reason why you have nothing in common with mainstream anarchists is that you are only an anarchist within your own mind. As when it comes to actually
doing something you prefer to do nothing. Now you claim to be violent and chaotic yet when was the last time you actually did something violent and chaotic
in the name of anarchy. And till you actually start committing acts pertaining to it you cannot claim to be one because unlike nihilism which is merely a state
of mind anarchy actually involves overthrowing the established order. And that cannot be achieved merely by thinking about it which is all that you are doing

Is that so? What do mainstream anarchists accomplish actually that I don’t? How do you know what acts I have and have not committed?

At any rate you don’t really need to attack an enemy that has every intention of killing and destroying themselves. That’s the beauty of today’s environment. Very soon around the world all the world governments are going to flatline where the beauty of it all is because of themselves living off of their own excesses. They just barely have a pulse now as the time draws near.

You obviously know nothing about combat. You don’t ambush the enemy until they’re at their most vulnerable and weakest.

We’re not there quite yet…soon, very soon…

Apocalypse is such a traditional quaint word. I prefer global economic collapse or the disintegration of civilization. It has more of a better ring to it.

My dear if you only knew what I do with my spare time. I of course am not going to tell you.

We should be appreciative for our slavery and captivity? Well, if that doesn’t define a particular train of thought concerning civil obedience I don’t know what does. Of course you got that whole slave herd and mentality thing going for you down pact.

You’re a boring little prude.