Too funny. 
Anarchist nihilism is the destruction of idle philosophy, the negation of idealism, the negation of mythology, and the destruction of perplexity along with the disingenuous despots that profit from it as the monopolist interpreters of artificial confusion. Therefore, Nihilism’s definitions are:
-
When conditions in the social organization are so unhealthy as to make destruction desirable for its own sake independent of any constructive program or possibility.
-
A doctrine of skepticism coupled with reduction that refutes faith, teleology, arbitrary morality, sacred values and principles, heresy, blasphemy, and similar beliefs while maintaining that existing political, social, and economic institutions based on these beliefs must be destroyed.
-
A methodology for a biologically-based existence that rejects arbitrary morality in favor of cause and effect and inviolate forces, predicated upon that which is objectively self-evident and without need of belief, within a sustainable mental and physical environment that promotes independent thinking and critical expression.
Anarchist nihilism is the destruction of idle philosophy, the negation of idealism, the negation of mythology, and the destruction of perplexity along with the disingenuous despots that profit from it as the monopolist interpreters of artificial confusion. Therefore, Nihilism’s definitions are:
-
When conditions in the social organization are so unhealthy as to make destruction desirable for its own sake independent of any constructive program or possibility.
-
A doctrine of skepticism coupled with reduction that refutes faith, teleology, arbitrary morality, sacred values and principles, heresy, blasphemy, and similar beliefs while maintaining that existing political, social, and economic institutions based on these beliefs must be destroyed.
-
A methodology for a biologically-based existence that rejects arbitrary morality in favor of cause and effect and inviolate forces, predicated upon that which is objectively self-evident and without need of belief, within a sustainable mental and physical environment that promotes independent thinking and critical expression.
[An aristocrat!] who advocated the self determination of peasants and working class some 200 years ago. What is wrong with this picture? First of all, that it should be, of all people, a nobleman - what an irony! Second, the standard of living has improved a lot in the last 200 years. An average person has a lot more freedoms and luxuries than ever before (maybe even a little too much). 200 years ago, they didn’t even have flushing toilets or antibiotics - things that we take for granted today. Heck, today, even illegal immigrants have a shot at good life! What government oppression are you talking about?
P.S.: So why aren’t you out there helping the refugee invasion like your fellow anarchists are doing all over?
No Borders at Union Square Rally
youtube.com/watch?v=-u4zxei5J7E
British Anarchists Help Migrants Storm Channel Tunnel
dailymail.co.uk/news/article … unnel.html
Activists and Refugees at French Border
youtube.com/watch?v=r2jwy4gzYT0
Greek Anarchists welcome refugees in Lesbos
youtube.com/watch?v=x0CBRuMrqzg
I have nothing in common with mainstream anarchists and for you to lump me up with them just shows your ignorance Pandora. Believe it or not I despise all mainstream anarchist groups and that should of been obvious if you took the time to read my original post of this thread.
If you even bothered reading my thread Nihilistic Interpretations On Racism And Multiculturalism you would know that I have nothing but disdain for government enforced multiculturalism or multiracialism concerning integration practices.
Let that take you off your ignorant high horse a notch.
I’m not a Marxist, communist, liberal, or even a capitalist for that matter. Your attempts at labeling me such is infantile and futile.
Government oppression doesn’t exist? Standard of living has improved for who?
Such a simplistic view of hierarchy. How embarrassing for you.
So what do you do now? Just wait for the apocalypse, attend prepper meetings and subscribe to Survival magazines?
Tsk, tsk. You sound quite unappreciative, you know. Why don’t you visit a local history museum and see how your ancestors have lived comparatively? The problem is not with the standards of living but with an attitude.
Was I trying to impress? Is this what you’re all about? Getting attention and approval?
How does the concept of ‘embarrassment’ even fit into your paradigm to justify you using it?
The reason why you have nothing in common with mainstream anarchists is that you are only an anarchist within your own mind. As when it comes to actually
doing something you prefer to do nothing. Now you claim to be violent and chaotic yet when was the last time you actually did something violent and chaotic
in the name of anarchy. And till you actually start committing acts pertaining to it you cannot claim to be one because unlike nihilism which is merely a state
of mind anarchy actually involves overthrowing the established order. And that cannot be achieved merely by thinking about it which is all that you are doing
Is that so? What do mainstream anarchists accomplish actually that I don’t? How do you know what acts I have and have not committed?
At any rate you don’t really need to attack an enemy that has every intention of killing and destroying themselves. That’s the beauty of today’s environment. Very soon around the world all the world governments are going to flatline where the beauty of it all is because of themselves living off of their own excesses. They just barely have a pulse now as the time draws near.
You obviously know nothing about combat. You don’t ambush the enemy until they’re at their most vulnerable and weakest.
We’re not there quite yet…soon, very soon…
Apocalypse is such a traditional quaint word. I prefer global economic collapse or the disintegration of civilization. It has more of a better ring to it.
My dear if you only knew what I do with my spare time. I of course am not going to tell you.
We should be appreciative for our slavery and captivity? Well, if that doesn’t define a particular train of thought concerning civil obedience I don’t know what does. Of course you got that whole slave herd and mentality thing going for you down pact.
You’re a boring little prude.
I ask you when was the last time you did something violent and chaotic in the name of anarchy and you cannot give a simple answer
You also keep repeating your mantra about the total collapse of civilisation - something for which there is zero precedent in history
but which you think will happen anyway. Now you claim that it will be soon but when exactly is that now ? Before or after you die ?