Anarchist Nihilism

The reason why you have nothing in common with mainstream anarchists is that you are only an anarchist within your own mind. As when it comes to actually
doing something you prefer to do nothing. Now you claim to be violent and chaotic yet when was the last time you actually did something violent and chaotic
in the name of anarchy. And till you actually start committing acts pertaining to it you cannot claim to be one because unlike nihilism which is merely a state
of mind anarchy actually involves overthrowing the established order. And that cannot be achieved merely by thinking about it which is all that you are doing

Is that so? What do mainstream anarchists accomplish actually that I don’t? How do you know what acts I have and have not committed?

At any rate you don’t really need to attack an enemy that has every intention of killing and destroying themselves. That’s the beauty of today’s environment. Very soon around the world all the world governments are going to flatline where the beauty of it all is because of themselves living off of their own excesses. They just barely have a pulse now as the time draws near.

You obviously know nothing about combat. You don’t ambush the enemy until they’re at their most vulnerable and weakest.

We’re not there quite yet…soon, very soon…

Apocalypse is such a traditional quaint word. I prefer global economic collapse or the disintegration of civilization. It has more of a better ring to it.

My dear if you only knew what I do with my spare time. I of course am not going to tell you.

We should be appreciative for our slavery and captivity? Well, if that doesn’t define a particular train of thought concerning civil obedience I don’t know what does. Of course you got that whole slave herd and mentality thing going for you down pact.

You’re a boring little prude.

I ask you when was the last time you did something violent and chaotic in the name of anarchy and you cannot give a simple answer
You also keep repeating your mantra about the total collapse of civilisation - something for which there is zero precedent in history
but which you think will happen anyway. Now you claim that it will be soon but when exactly is that now ? Before or after you die ?

There was zero precedent of a globalized world before fifty years ago and yet here we are. If you are too ignorant that you can’t see a collapsing environment all over the world then frankly you’re lost to me and not worth the effort concerning expenditure of energy.

I don’t have to tell you shit. You and Pandora want to focus this entire thread on me personally without even discussing the subject of this thread that it entails. You’re both annoying pests.

Actually the subject of this thread is about reconciling your nihilistic beliefs with your anarchist beliefs so is personally about you

I rest my case. Not worth the expenditure of energy. I see hanging out with the KT crowd it hasn’t took you very long to pick up their traits of ignoring subject materials going straight on with personal attacks only.

I don’t mind fighting or personal attacks myself but at least I try to stay on subject and point when I go into either.

Go back to KT where you belong where there you can all masturbate each other’s objectivist hysterias. Take Pandora with you.

Now I have never attacked you as all I have done is ask you simple straightforward
questions pertaining to your anarchist beliefs which you cannot apparently answer

It’s the way you go about asking your questions that are indeed insulting. Don’t play coy with me.

If you want to discuss what I describe as Anarchist Nihilism that is fine. You will however cease engaging me about my personal life.

A civilized anarchist!

Do you want us to send you a list of questions first, so you can sort out which ones hurt your feelings and which do not?

Are you actually asking others to be easy on you? To play…ahem…fair?

“Insulting”…that’s another word that belongs in the “embarrassment” family. I don’t know why an anarchist is even using these words.

This is what I have never understood about “anarchists”. They call for something like global economic collapse or breakdown of society and all that their fantasizing minds correlate with that (see photos above), yet simultaneously are idealists/utopians that are seemingly blind to reality in one form or another, resulting in situations like the above. I call it the Underpants Model for Civilization (See: Underpants gnomes)

If you only knew what I would do to people in an isolated dark alley way that I don’t like left to me alone five minutes in the dark. :laughing:

Oh, I’m sorry, not the answer you were looking for? :evilfun:

No, you can try to hurt my feelings all you want. I could care less really. I was merely articulating my dismay for your guys lack of respect concerning the general conversation of the thread at hand. Rather than discuss the topic you guys are all trying to make the whole subject about the Joker personally.

This is the kind of behavior I would expect out of immature teenagers not full grown adults but…

Idealist? Utopian? :laughing:

You don’t know shit. I am the complete opposite of both.

That’s some dumb whacked out bullshit you’re espousing there.

Looks like the KT crowd wants to play on ILP and take cheap shots at me here. Want to play? I’m down. :evilfun:

My questions are not the least bit insulting and so stop implying that they are. Neither am I interested in your personal life. I have simply asked you to explain your anarchist beliefs and no thing else. You do not have to do that of course but I will still point out inconsistencies where I see them. And here is one : you claim most human beings are spine less cowards for not wanting to kill internationalists. But you the self proclaimed violent chaotic anarchist would not do any killing yourself because you do not want to get arrested. So your position is entirely false. For as I have already said you like to call yourself an anarchist but at the same time you are not prepared to actually engage in any. I shall continue to point out the hypocrisy of your position as long as you do do nothing. Which is neither insulting or an invasion of your privacy as you imply. But the simple undeniable truth

I was implying no killing as of yet…

Must I get a sign language interpreter or teleprompter for you? Geez…

Also, I’ve been explaining things quite well in this thread concerning my beliefs.

That is a very convenient thinking. Do you have plan B just in case this does not happen?

Also, one does not have to be an anarchist to be able to strike the weak or exploit the weaknesses. Being an anarchist does not necessarily mean that you’d have an advantage when and if civilization collapses. Somehow you’re assuming (hoping really) that when everything shakes out, you’d end up at the top of the food chain. But top people have a deeper understanding of human nature and how to manipulate it in different situations. And you do not come across as that kind of person.
You could very well become victim of your own ‘friends’.

I have multiple plans for many things. Don’t strike you as that kind of person? You really don’t know what kind of person I really am. A bit presumptuous on your part.

A deeper understanding? Oh, is that so? Victims of my own friends? Unlikely. There’s ways to dealing with traitors.

I’m just a ronin man and you be surprised how formidable we ronins can really be especially in the absence of law.

You consistently stay within certain boundaries, and that defines you. If you want to play coy and mysterious, go ahead, but don’t think that it would make anyone with real sense think any better of you for it.

In the absence of law, even o-r-g-a-n-I-z-e-d crime will have a lot more accomplished - it may even become the next ruling government.