DNA wise ALL humans are born with a POTENTIAL to be Evil

You cannot worship one with out the other . The fact you identify evil as you do, is worship.

So if I identity an inbound missile, about to blow me up, I am worshipping the missile as well? If I identity the random guy who robbed me, I am worshiping him too?

Correction; {}
“Btw, I have spent {almost} 3 years full time basis studying Kant and his philosophy …”

I admit I do not know German.
If you insist in using German, then there is something wrong with you.

So far, you have not justified where I am wrong at all.

Just show me, like;
Prismatic567 stated ‘Y is true’ but
the truth as justified is “X”.

Btw, don’t bring language to mess up the issue,
-any difference in terms of language can be reconciled.

Note this;

A certain range of acts that are negative to the well-being of humanity had existed since eons ago and getting worse.

The point here is we need a concept to capture the moral significance of these actions and their perpetrators to enable humanity to address the related effectively.

So evil [defined] as a concept in this sense is not a social construct like institutionalized religions, various ideologies and the likes.

What I have presented is to trace evil [as defined] acts to their ultimate root causes within the DNA and the fetal development of the neurons in the brain.

If humanity were to focus on these ultimate root causes then there is a good possibility of preventing and reducing evil acts within humanity in the future.

At present most people are merely fire-fighting the issues of evil acts by focusing on the secondary causes.

Remove the DNA potential of growing a human who commits acts of evil and you will will have a corpse.

Ignorant again. I am not proposing that we do something to the DNA and neural connectivity now. What is critical is for the majority to understand the ultimate root causes as mentioned in the OP and other posts herein.

Once we are aware of the ultimate root causes we can strive towards dealing with the DNA and neural connectivity in the brain in the future, e.g.

1. Genomics
Within the next 100 years it is possible for humanity to manipulate any DNA factors that contribute to ‘evil’ [as defined].
Obviously there are many potential of complicated side-effects in manipulating the DNA but it is nevertheless a possibility and executable when we have developed fool proofs methods.

2. Connectome
A connectome \kəˈnɛktoʊm\ is a comprehensive map of neural connections in the brain, and may be thought of as its “wiring diagram”. More broadly, a connectome would include the mapping of all neural connections within an organism’s nervous system.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectome

Within the next 100 years, it is possible for humanity to map out all [if not the major and critical ones] the neural connectivity in the human brain.
With various technology, e.g. nano-technology and other advance technology humanity would be able to promote stronger inhibitors that will enable one to modulate the potentially evil impulses before they turned ‘evil’ in reality.

Within the next 100 years or more humanity would be able to have access to a diverse range of advance knowledge, technology and self-development programs to manage their potentially evil impulses.

In the meantime where we have people with ostrich-mentality like you, how are we to progress effectively.

By manipulating the DNA I don’t think we should remove the murder reflex. The murder reflex exists to keep really bad people in check.

When people in society say they are good, yet make your life a living hell, there needs to be a DNA mechanism of hate to keep them in check.

Joker is an example of this, everyday he posts about how evil the world is and politics, but without his hate reflex, he’d be a goodie two-shoes keeping quietly to himself and conforming.

I dont advocate nanobots forcing people to be good, meanwhile the world is a living hell and they aren’t allowed to be violent. And the nanobots prevent them suicide, which is against the geneva convention and is Torture.

Still accusing of his own guilt.

:laughing:
“After we have the trial, we will hang him”.

You already proclaim the “root cause” as being the DNA (the foundation of the person). But then you say once you “discover” (aka. “create enough statistics to convince people of our decision”), you will decide what to do about it.
:laughing:

…never, never license this guy for a gun. :confused:

Your defacto definition of “Evil” is “Whatever our socialist regime declares unwanted behavior”.

You are proving to be a true sociopath.

James, the reason for the DnA machine is exactly this reason. People like this exist who want to make everyone’s life a living hell for the greater “good”. Unless we change their DnA we will be forever subjugated to their tyranny. DnA is the only option, other wise they will just infect us with nanobats.

What would be the significance of the difference?
A) Force all life on Earth to be as dictated via DNA manipulation
B) Force all life on Earth to be as dictated via nanobots

No just humans, especially politicians.

Only politicians/law-makers etc need their mind DnA changed, the rest can keep their minds and just make their bodies more pretty with it.

:laughing:

Eather you are lying or not capable of studying Kant and his philosophy without knowing that fact.

So you admit to not have read Kant. I thought so.

So there is something wrong with you.

Wrong again. I have justified where you are wrong in almost every post. If you are not capable of reading them, then you obviously do not know English either.

I do not have to repeat my words again and again.

DNA was not known when Kant wrote his books. So Kant did not say anything about “DNA”. Your deductions are completely false. Morality is something that must be learned. There is no morality gene. Any statement that there might be a morality gene has been falsified.

What you are saying is false. And it is dangerous too

Prismatic 567 is not capable of showing any tiny hint that his silly “statements” could be true. You have not read Kant’, you know nothing about morality, nothing about genetics, nothing about children, nothing about education, … and so on and so forth. Your posts have shown this fact very clearly, regardless whether you admit it or not.

Absolutely wrong.

And you forgot to say: “don’t bring up to use words against me”.

Sorry, but you are just too dumb.

Yes. Probably he is even more than that.

Okay, to round this up.

Prism is not a sociopath, he is a modern, moderns cannot be sociopaths since they are not as conscious as sociopaths. Sociopaths are fully conscious, almost superconscious. His thoughts and plans are not well thought through, they are basically not fully planned, and thus not fully conscious, but more derived from a trance like state. Unless of course, he is a sociopath, and using reverse psychology.

moderns like to believe that Nurture is everything and gene’s don’t matter. It is 50/50. I am sure there are many genes that contribute to morality, so the statement “there is no gene for morality” is true in a sense, you will not find one isolated gene that causes morality, but a collection of genes that over the complexities and accidental interactions do.

I am fully aware that my DnA machine can be used to make supersoldiers, or make citizens stupider than they are already. Given how stupid they are how stupid they are becoming it’s a risk I’m willing to take. We don’t avoid technology because of the potential risk, we don’t avoid medicine because evil doctors could potentially make a virus with it, we don’t shutdown the internet because it can potentially be used to spy on people. That is cowardice, accepting sickness for fear of the cure. And at this point, we don’t have an option, humanity is doomed without it.

It is true that “you will not find one isolated gene that causes morality”. And it is also true that even several genes that could cause morality are not findable. His stupid “statements” collapse in any case. The main issue is that his “statements” are not only stupid but also evil, thus dangerous.

He would have to prove that “all humans are born with a potential to be evil”, because that is his stupid, false, evil, dangerous “statement”. It is not possible to prove that. He is WRONG. His “statement” is FALSE.

It is possible to falsify his “statement”, because there is no single genetic finding, no result. no experiment that can prove his “statement”.

No, that’s such a wrong headed way of looking at it.

That’s like a blueprint of a house, and you say the house doesn’t exist, because you look at individual pages of the blueprints and don’t see a house.

If you remove the ability to choose between doing good vs evil, you remove life, because making that choice moment by moment is what life is.