I challenge Uccisore

I debated you as a joke and to amuse myself. I’ve already told that joke, and already had that fun. You don’t take that last debate to be a sign that I think you’re worth the time to seriously talk to, do you? I’ve said the opposite over and over again.

Why, other than as a joke, would anybody debate somebody who’s so mentally incompetent that they can’t even reliably express a coherent thought? All our discussions including that one have gone the exact same way- I make a point, you ramble a bunch of incoherent nonsense, I make fun of you until there’s something good on T.V. That’s it. That’s what you’re for. That’s why you should take up something like wood carving or curling or baking- some field that doesn’t require the parts of your brain that don’t work, so you can finally stop being a joke.

Imagine how cool that would be- if you could make really good bread, and everybody thought your bread was great, and wanted to eat your bread and buy your bread and know your secrets of breadmaking, and you didn’t have to constantly pretend to be intelligent or rational and frustrate yourself? I don’t know. Maybe baking is too much to ask of somebody with your challenges- but you get what I’m saying, right?

We never play by ANY rules, even when stayed. Take the dreamscape actions we decide upon, are we IN a Dream, or OF the dream, and it’s chaotic chorse and collapsing narrative? Is schema at best periphial or even just added on after the fact, and we determine how reasonable it is from perception and willingness to engadge?

Even when we add strict rules of objective, third party arbitrators, such as a referee, are we still playing by the rules? Why are they so very frequently broken then, and open up to debate by angry players and coaches doing chicken dances on the field?

What we call rules, are they a means or a end? How well are we accepting of them on a unconscious level, and what does this say about the nature of ontology and telelogy? What does it say about who we are as a species? What did it evolve out of? Our ability to track a projectile? To organize a hunt? Do we actually believe cavemen had open enrollment and posted rules for their caves? Was JSS presumption remotely correct here:

Isn’t science just a presumptive side effect of parallel processes like play, descended from a awareness we can privledge focus on aspects and yet disregard other aspects of thought? Is science just another form of Homo Ludens at play, a sub classification of a much larger activity we all engadge in, but insist must be different? It really isn’t that different in many areas of thinking, and it isn’t the rules that determine the remaining operations of desiderata, but rather identity and social justification that what we do here is worthy of pay and relaxation, but there is fun and games. It is all the dialectic in the end, we’re just primates thinking, manipulating with our hands and thoughts, screwing around. Most mental operations aren’t aware of “the rules”.

I made the argument that all assertions in and of themselves are arguments…

I am walking

The sky is blue

Ecmandu’s an idiot

They are arguments without additional content

Uccisore argued the opposite…

That just because there’s reference doesn’t mean it’s an argument.

Carleas gave it to him.

If I had that debate today, I’d win …

Turd actually thinks someone more intelligent than him is his lab rat.

You guys are assholes

This cycle of rage and disappointment is never going to stop unless you do something different. Take your meds, and get a non-intellectual hobby or trade.

I’m allowed to feel anger about anti intellectuals such as yourself and Turd if I want.

The most intellectual concept in the universe is that unless you are working to solve the overlapping and mutually exclusive desire problem:

A.) you deserve no resource
B.) you are an anti-intellectual

Anti-intellectuals are people who contradict themselves for social status …

You actually think calling me schizophrenic or using the decades old “take your meds”, and then merely asserting my posts never have content enough times that then finally everyone will believe you.

You are a rotten man Uccisore …

You don’t even deserve to be on these boards, and yet here you are with the handing over of the reigns.

I’ll also debate you on that :

Whether you’re an power hungry anti intellectual

Uccisore, why don’t we actually have a real philosophy topic for a change.

I defined intellectualism.

If you can defeat my argument I’ll accept the title of dunce…

Assuming don’t want to play for my banning like last time

Read the last one:

Also, you get Carleas too!!

Nobody should be rooting for me who likes underdogs to win.

This will be hilarious… I will destroy you two in debate

Actually, I’ll give you guys Turd and phyllo if you want as well…

4 rounds to 1 round, and I only get one post per round!!

I’m trying to make it fair Uccisore!

See, right there. You already sound like a retard. Philosophers, academics, ‘intellectuals’ and hell, adults, don’t talk that way. You would be a lot happier with life if you could realize that this kind of thing really isn’t your bag.

Seriously, have you tried baking? Everybody likes bread. Are you lucid enough to wash your hands, follow a recipe, etc?

Oh, I promise not to disappoint !!!

Remember, you can all put a dunce cap on my head if I lose…

Those stakes are in jest…

If you guys lose, you have to apple-a-gize!! In honor of SNL

Remember that time you created a poll to ask if your posts were coherent, and 90% of respondents told you they were not?

What makes you think you can help whether you disappoint or not? You aren’t mentally fit, it’s not a promise you can keep.

And guess what??

They understood the poll and all contradicted themselves

Well, for example, people reading this thread won’t even be able to tell what it is you’re challenging me to debate you about. I still don’t know. In fact, I don’t even think you care what the topic is. This is just a desperate, pathetic attempt to prove you should generally be taken seriously.

My challenges to Uccisore:

Uccisore deleted a post in politics that almost nobody on earth can answer (probably even Uccisore) if asked.

The question: what is left (liberal) and right (conservative); what is democrat and republican?

Left (liberal) is: be who you are, if you fuck with anyone else’s “be who you are” we send you to prison

Right (conservative) is: to hamper individual freedom for the sake of innovation in all forms because of collectivism, will never move the collective forward

Democrat: everything is voted and decided by popular vote

Republican: everything is decided by representatives (specialists) in their field

Now, why Uccisore would see fit to delete that in politics, and then tell me I know NOTHING about politics, makes him look mentally ill.

Then in the society aspect of the forum, which he also deleted, I posted that suicide should be legal and a right for everyone to facilitate the idea of personal freedom against slavery. Again, Uccisore is mentally ill to decide this has nothing to do with society.

Then I said that if trumps tax returns had been hacked, he would not be our president. This means that the hackers decided the election!

He deleted all three of those, and everyone, even Carleas, calls my content absurd, and calls me mentally ill.

I made the argument that all assertions in and of themselves are arguments…

I am walking

The sky is blue

Ecmandu’s an idiot

They are arguments without additional content

Uccisore argued the opposite…

That just because there’s reference doesn’t mean it’s an argument.

Carleas gave it to him.

If I had that debate today, I’d win …

This is the debate Uccisore says he was just toying with me on.

I’ll also debate that the issue of overlapping desires and mutually exclusive desires is the pinnacle of rationality.

That’s 5 debates, lest there be confusion

SO yeah, like I said, nobody can tell what the fuck it is you actually want to debate.

Take your goddamned meds and leave this board alone, eh?

Uccisore, to put it bluntly, you are not an extremely intelligent person.

Aside from the fact that 5 debates is so many that you exasperate “nobody knows what you want to debate” you’re actually, and I mean actually, not a brilliant person.

I think you’re jealous of me actually.

You shouldn’t be, my life is very hard, but over the last week, I’ve decided that you’re actually jealous of me.

I think you’re either narcissistic or apd…

Not positive yet, I know for a fact it’s one or the other, maybe both.

People with schizophrenia (assuming I even have it) are psychologically healthier than personality disorders. But you don’t know much about psychology…

You’re like this little child, saying “ecmandu is a shit because he wants to be respected”

What’s wrong with that? And what the fuck are you? Same damn thing hypocrite !!

You don’t seem to understand that psychological issues are the norm… Me not having a personality disorder, doesn’t bother me at all …

As they say “thou doth protest too much”

You and I both know my posts have content, your posts have stereotypes of a bully…

Both of us know that you understood my post …

Instead of falling over yourself - you just start demeaning, name calling and denying.

Now I see why ad Homs are legal on your boards…

It’s not that they can’t contribute to debate and discussion (which they can ) it’s the only real intellectual tool you have

Read above:

Also Uccisore, you have on several occasions said that all you wanted out of me was to toy with me, and then you got bored.

That’s classic sociopathy Uccisore …

I mean, textbook, classic.

Non sociopaths are psychologically incapable of saying that!!!

Meaning, it’s impossible …

They’d rather commit suicide than say that!!

Seriously Uccisore !!!

So here’s where we are…

I’ve contributed to intellectual pursuits and you’ve parroted pseudo intellectual pursuits…

You hate me for it.

And like Ted Bundy, you consider yourself an expert without representing expertise (he fashioned himself a brilliant lawyer even though he dropped out of law school)

The things you accuse me of, are just you talking to yourself.

Sure, I don’t know everything Uccisore knows…

But in terms of sheer contribution, Uccisore is a nobody with a power button compared to me, and he hates it, loathes me for it.

He runs when the debates get real, as sociopaths with delusions of grandeur are want to do.

Is this generally how you persuade people to debate you, or am I just special?

You clearly think you’re amazing, but society doesn’t think you’re competent enough to bag their groceries or pump their gas, so they give you free money. Think about that. You’re asking for a debate as if it would prove something- but you and I have already debated several times, and you came out looking like a fool or a crazy person in every one of them. I am content. You have nothing to offer, besides; if you were going to honor the terms of a debate, you would have stopped posting here the last time I beat you, as was agreed.

Lol… It worked last time!

Actually, I want multiple debators…

You’d be too easy now

Yeah, I hadn’t finished making fun of you last time. Besides, last time you said you’d leave the site forever if I beat you, so there was an incentive. So now we know your word is as good as your debating skills.