Best part: “Now, a bunch of rich, powerful white men want to return us to this sensibility, wrapped in a populist “follow the Constitution” rallying cry and disguised as the ultimate form of patriotism.”
There’s no more efficient method to cause people to wipe their ass with that antiquated rag than to deify the graven image as a neo-biblical religion whose worship is mandatory in lieu of hanging for treason. And the mindless machines chant “God, family and country!” It is not heresy; I shall not recant.
This is a majority white country, it belongs first and foremost to whites.
Of course white people tend to put theirs first, just as brown people tend to put theirs first.
You’re a guest in our homeland, if you protest this natural state of affairs, you should be deported.
Publicly declaring you’ve been mistreated by whites collectively, or what ‘progressives’ like to call ‘systemic discrimination’ (and not just one or two whites individually, which’s acceptable), is itself hate speech, racism, intolerable, and ought to be grounds for considering your deportation.
Again, that is what she and the people she speaks on behalf of are saying.
I call bullshit, if she really felt that way, she’d have no qualms about being deported, which of course she would.
They’re exaggerating their ‘plight’ for attention, sympathy, donations and ‘reparations’ they don’t deserve.
She and her ilk love western civilization, and how could they not?
Where else can minorities and women vote, go to college, attain a prestigious career, and enjoy such a high standard of living?
Jews, many Asian population groups and even some African pop groups such as Nigerians fare better than the host population by many metrics: economically, educationally and so on.
In what other place and time in the history of civilization did many minorities fare better than the host population, yet have the audacity to label this oppression?
None that I’m aware of, that’s how far out in the left field progressives have taken us.
There is no such thing as systemic discrimination against women and minorities in western civilization, what there is are occasional-rare instances of discrimination, which’re often corrected by government, and then some.
Instead what we have today is systemic discrimination against men and the majority.
You can police hate-speech, and we do police hate-speech, here. Not sure if it comes under the public nuisance act or not, but it is an arrestable offence to verbally attack a person in public simply because you feel to.
The problem the West has, is with the sheer numbers of immigrants flooding into the West, which has now caused the huge spike in nationalism and put pressure on services/deliverables and any other outward facing organisations, but the West is not allowed to have that courtesy… from problems past. The historical past currently dictating the present, and what of the future.
Today, it is permissible to criticize whites, but not non-whites.
For me, and increasingly for more whites, that’s intolerable, either it should be permissible to criticize every race, no race, or if anything, non-whites should be forbidden from criticizing whites, while whites can criticize non-whites.
If progressives can pull up facts to criticize whites in some instances, like how we occasionally (un)fairly discriminate against minorities (every race tends to prefer its own, by far and away whites are the least racist race), and make shit up in others, conservatives should be able to pull up facts to criticize non-whites, like how some non-whites are more prone to ignorance, poverty and violence on the one hand, while other non-whites political and economic influence hurts us on the other, as well as make policy in light of these facts.
There’s far too many immigrants, and way too much development.
Western civilizations ‘vices’ have been greatly exaggerated in some instances, and lied about in others, while its virtues have been downplayed and denied, in order to shame us into allowing ourselves to be annihilated, and increasingly whites are waking up to it, resulting in a surging backlash.
The election of Donald Trump in the US, Giuseppe Conte in Italy and Brexit could be just the very beginning of this backlash.
She said criticism of races can lead to violence against races.
But criticism of any demographic, or individual for that matter can lead to violence: criticism of gender, class, creed, culture…subcultures…corporations, political parties, sport teams…
Should we therefore ban criticism altogether, because a few morons take things too far?
Of course not.
And of course they have no reservations criticizing white men, because according to them, white men are uniquely malevolent, or else uniquely lucky, have unearned privileges, which is still a criticism, racist and sexist.
According to them, only white men as a demographic can objectively be proven to have ‘flaws’ (a highly subjective word) or unearned privileges (a highly subjective term), no other demographic can objectively be proven to have flaws or unearned privileges, and so only criticism of white men is valid and permissible.
This is not an objective narrative, this is not a level playing field, it’s a monstrously biased, duplicitous narrative used to bamboozle white men into being subjugated by non-whites and women.
What we have here is a restricted racism and sexism, it’s okay to criticize, and bash white men, because they deserve it, no other demographic ever does.
And Of course this is total bullshit.
Of course other races and women have flaws and unearned privileges, and we can objectively demonstrate them roughly as easily as they can demonstrate ours.
We can argue over which race and sex is more flawed or privileged, but to say only one demographic has flaws or privileges is on its face retarded, self-evidently, but that is just the kind of swill white men are being sold and swallowing en masse by our treacherous, treasonous governments for the last several decades, governments who’ve been hijacked by corporations and bureaucrats who don’t give a fuck about white men, or anyone for that matter but the bottom line, and progressive, or anti-white male ideologues, who seek to prop themselves up at our expense.
If we do not turn the tables on them sooner than later, white men will end up slaves on what used to be their soil.
She insulted my race by saying we failed to live up to her expectations.
Her comments are hurtful, hateful and racist.
She has no business being in our country.
Dudes of course the white western man has no guilt all the conquistadores and pirates were dead over some centuries ago.
Its completely unfair and biased to judge white kids with this. they’re just in debt and slaves like the rest. I can’t even believe how racist it is hahaha. It makes me feel so superior.
Im not going to blame some Asian dude for what Ghenhis Kahn did, am I?
It may be majority white, but that doesn’t mean it belongs to them. If population meant anything, then the first whites would have recognized and respected that the country belonged to the redskins before turning their boats around and heading back to Europe.
If you’re illegal, then you should be deported, but brown people who are born here shouldn’t be treated as if they are illegals nor told to go home when they are home; that’s an egregious insult and especially because of the hypocrisy that the whites are also not indigenous.
So pointing out a crime is a crime because it’s hate speech against the criminal?
It’s not the white man that’s the problem, but the old white man in power promulgating dogmatic reverence for a set of ideals specific to white caste culture (christian/family values, capitalism, conservatism, contempt for the poor, etc).
That’s the party of the old white man, the Boomers, who are too stupid to realize they are the Redcoats (Tories) we kicked out in 1776.
There are two ways of viewing the Government’s duty in matters affecting economic and social life. The first sees to it that a favored few are helped and hopes that some of their prosperity will leak through, sift through, to labor, to the farmer, to the small business man. That theory belongs to the party of Toryism, and I had hoped that most of the Tories left this country in 1776. - Franklin D. Roosevelt, Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, July 2, 1932 presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=75174
It’s time we start calling these fools what they are: Redcoats! Whiteness is just coincidental (royalty abhors sunlight lest they be viewed as laborers); it ain’t the white that pisses me off, but it’s the red that makes me see red.
01:08
like, what does it take for
01:12
folks on your end of the aisle
01:14
to understand that people have lived
01:16
experiences, and who wake up every day,
01:18
every single day in this country, whether
01:21
you think their victimhood complex is
01:23
real or not, and they don’t feel like a
01:26
part of this country, and you can sit and
01:28
blame them all you want, but this campus
01:31
is a great example right here when we
01:33
have people on this campus who are
01:34
claiming that it is all sunshine and
01:36
rainbows, and they have the
01:37
administration on their side, and then
01:39
the reality is that biased incidence
01:41
reports and hate crimes have gone up.
01:43
yeah so and people have been spit on and
01:46
people have been threatened and people
01:47 have been told to go home to their
01:49 country even though they were born in
01:50 fucking New Jersey
How do you know she is illegal?
How do you know their plight is exaggerated?
And you want to hog it all. Wealth disparity. Afterall, we can’t have the rich unless we have the poor, so the poor must be impoverished in order to maintain the disparity for the rich. In order for the US to be powerful, other places must be shitholes, so tell the woman “Go back to your shithole and start making Nikes and iphones at $2/hr so I can go on living like a king.” Why not just tell her the truth? “Get to work brownie! Those iphones won’t make themselves!”
Jews and Asians are smarter than the host population.
Because you refuse to recognize what your brethren are doing, so you’re part of the problem and why all whites are being targeted. As long as you maintain loyalty, you’re on the side of the oppressors whether you are actively oppressing or not.
I meant racial slurs/abuse in the public arena… regardless of the agitator’s background, as such scenes became an everyday occurrence on public transport and in public places… sometimes leading to the agitators turning to physical attacks when their racial abuse was ignored like they didn’t exist - the public complained… the Government listened… new policing policy was made, and a public nuisance act disappeared over night.
Criticism of races made on the back of government legislation should be aimed at that government, so that legislation can be revisited and amended, to reflect new acceptable immigration quotas.
Leading to a false economy.
All civilisations have vices… one vice not being anymore worse than the other’s, but is that really the underlying factor in the overly-enforced immigration quotas? seems like more of an excuse, rather than a factor, for enforcement.
When will this racial madness end? It’s all very school-playground and leads to school-playground outcomes, resulting in adult forms of bullying… be it public attacks or personal infringements on one’s human rights… in all its current televised and reported forms.
…I thought enslaving other nations was so passé, but tell that to the Libyans… depending on whether the footage going round is real or not.
…glad you didn’t remember my Caribbean roots, and that her country of origin was a random wild guess My guess would have been Middle Eastern… or there abouts.
…countries fail their own too… are those failed nationals not allowed to express their view? and knowing why she felt failed by her host country would have given less room for insult to be felt, but the reasons why were not asked.
I guess her sass didn’t go down as well as she thought it would… don’t you know who she is? she never revealed… though she revealed a hint of a prior exchange. Perhaps she had an ulterior motive in making her documented presence an assured one.
If you applied your principle consistently, the Canadian and US governments should be entirely made up of Native Americans.
North America was almost entirely wilderness before whites settled it.
Wilderness does not a country make.
But even if whites had no right to settle centuries ago, the reality is we’re here today, and we’re the majority.
The government should reflect contemporary demographics, not historical ones.
Whites shouldn’t be punished for what their ancestors may, or mayn’t’ve done centuries ago.
In the main, Native Americans don’t really exist anymore, culturally and even genetically, they’re partly European.
It’s not accurate to call them Native Americans, they’re mestizos.
I’m kind of divided on this.
I don’t want to come off as hateful to minorities.
I don’t believe my race is superior, nor do I have any desire whatsoever to oppress anyone.
I’m very respectful to everyone I meet, regardless of race, religion and so on.
Part of me is libertarian minded regarding racial matters, the other part of me wants to protect whites from what I see as the dissemination of anti-white propaganda.
Perhaps I was overreacting when I said she should be deported.
Still if we are to have protections from racism at all, there ought to be laws protecting whites from hate speech made by non-whites and their advocates (which’s what ‘liberals’, ‘progressives’ or whatever you want to call them in fact do, disseminate anti-white propaganda), just as there’re laws protecting non-whites from hate speech.
And the laws ought to be evenly enforced across the board, not just enforced for non-whites.
And if government is to show favoritism to one race over others, which’s not necessarily what I’m advocating we do, if anything it should show favoritism to whites, because this’s our homeland.
If a white person has committed a crime, like theft, rape or murder of a non-white person, they have the right to report it and seek justice.
But that’s not what this person and progressives are saying.
They’re saying whites systemically discriminate (Meaning mistreatment non-whites by whites is rampant and widespread. And as far as I know, systemic is arbitrarily defined, at what point does something move from being rare or occasional to systemic? It boils down to them just hating on whitey) against non-whites, which is itself racism.
Firstly, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with (small) businesses favoring white employees and customers over non-white employees and customers.
Secondly, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with police honing in on non-white population groups who’ve earned their reputation for being violent.
Thirdly, races are going to show a little favoritism towards other members of their race now and then, as long as it isn’t taken to extremes, there’s nothing wrong with this, and it’s to be expected.
Mulattos, mestizos and so on do the same thing, and if you went to India or China they would sometimes show favoritism, in fact far more than we do I’m sure.
If you don’t like it, you can leave.
If you want to criticize us for it, than we have the right to criticize you for things we don’t like about you, like if your race disproportionately commits crimes, is racist, or whatever weaknesses they (appear) to have.
It is anti-white to say only whites can be corrupt, or that whites are uniquely corrupt, or to make laws preventing whites from being racist, but not laws preventing non-whites from being racist against whites.
I’m an agnostic, and as for family values, capitalism and conservatism, I have mixed thoughts about such things.
I don’t have any contempt for the poor, so long as people that can work, work.
Many working class white men are Christians, Capitalists and Conservatives, and now many Mulatto and Mestizo Americans are too, so these values aren’t exclusively the values of rich white men, and there’s nothing necessarily wrong, or illegitimate about maintaining or adopting them.
My guess would have been Middle Eastern… or there abouts.