First of all, this requires 100% knowledge of said day. Of the 100% of what you know, you might be having a good day without any knowledge of any psychopath or any of his actions that most of the time aren’t psychopathic anyway - and this doesn’t make you psychopathic. You might also know of psychopathy in said day, but choose to ignore it - you don’t have to be a psychopath to ignore (whether intentionally or unintentionally), just human. Much to my frustration, people lie to themselves all the time, and will delude themselves just to minimise the amount of difficult feelings that they would otherwise feel. This isn’t psychopathy, it’s just weakness. How the hell do you know that a 6 year old Bangladeshi kid is being raped by his Sunday school teacher, or that any such monstrous act is occurring that day? It might not be. It might not have so far and you might be enjoying the day with or without this 100% knowledge of the world without being a psychopath.
Why is your default stance 100% of both spatial and temporal knowledge? Nobody can hope to get even remotely close to that, so as suspected your standard of psychopathy is illegitimate.
This hyperdimensional-mirrored consensual non-zero sum reality sounds like the age-old e.g. Christian mental escapism into a non-reality that you delude yourself into considering as real, and where you’d finally “get your revenge” despite having zero realistic path there or having any (legitimate) proof that such a reality could even be reached.
It’s obvious why men being mean gets them laid - it’s a show of dominance - any such show will do. It just needs to reassure the weaker female (with more at stake reproductively) that they are safe if anyone is mean etc to them: with a mean male, they have their meat-shield to protect both them and their offspring. Any other scenario would not prevail over the generations, so it’s the only possible reality that we can have. Don’t get “furious” about it, that’s 100% pointless. It’s not evil, it’s how reality has to be and it could be no other way.
For sure he knows nothing about psychopaths, or pretty much anything at all from what I can tell. I think he is intentionally trying to be this way, to eliminate nuance altogether just to end up with a monolithic delusion that he’s happy with, regardless of its complete unreality.
But on the same token, and I’m not saying you’re as bad as he is, dissociating yourself from the bad that goes on in the world doesn’t make you a psychopath. It’s a natural mechanism of the sane mind to rid itself of unwelcome thoughts and feelings - it makes people into highly dishonest enemies of truth, but at least it keeps them capable of dealing with the world and surviving. Maintaining a sympathetic engagement with the world like you used to cannot sustain itself, and the ability to deal with regular worldly things will not be possible. This is what happens to the depressed.
I’m not saying psychopaths have an easy time of relationships, but they have an easy time getting them started. To maintain them they need an emotionally vulnerable woman who they can make submit, even as they probably try and do the same with any number of women who they keep things going with at the same time. Not feeling connected doesn’t matter if you can fake it, which is what they learn to do just to fit in and ease the getting of their way. It’s not like psychopaths feel no fear at all, it just doesn’t work the same as regular people. Like you, they feel numb, and they often seek out thrills to get an adrenaline boost, with less fear of the consequences, they like winning and dominating others, regular hedonistic pleasures etc. That’s not to say that everyone who seeks these things and feels numb is a psychopath, it’s only that psychopaths feel numb and seek these things. They don’t want bad consequences, they learn to be very sneaky in getting out of them - presumably from getting into such situations often and learning to find and exploit weaknesses in those who get in the way of what they want to do. I wouldn’t pay any much heed to the entertainment industry for accurate portrayals - just listen to psychologists. They say that there is a gene component to psychopathy, but it depends on how it reacts with the environment they grow up into. They might turn out normal, but under certain environments, their psychopathy will come to light. And that’s not to say that these certain environments would turn any normal person into a psychopath. Psychopaths aren’t just angry and resentful but otherwise normal people, they just have a slightly different version of the same brain as anyone else in some particular way rather than another.
I’d look more into autism than psychopathy if I were you, whether they’re linked or not. You don’t sound particularly autistic, there’s just more of that than there is psychopathy. In reality it’s probably nothing that dramatic and you’re just a guy with a life that’s difficult. But ask yourself - do you want a pathology to explain away all the challenges you have in life? Or do you just want to deal with them in whatever way you can (which you have to anyway)? The best that pathologies can do is put you in touch with people who have similar challenges and hanging around them might make you feel more at home but you still have to deal with you and your place in the world.