Medieval Diseases Are Infecting California’s Homeless

Tetanus jabs contain mercury? :open_mouth:

No wonder the jab I had in march 2017 aggravated my already-aggravated chronic fatigue, (which was initially triggered by an anesthetic jab), by tenfold… and the stupid dumb b*tch of a Pharmacist said that it just contained the vaccine, and saline… she obviously doesn’t know what constitutes a vaccine. #-o I wouldn’t have had it if I’d known… and my cousin got fatigued by his tetanus jab that he had around the same time as me… we were a sad sight to behold. :frowning:

…now that would take me years to recover from… but, then again, your jabs might not contain the same cell-disrupting chemicals that the EU have slowly been adding into our food and medicine chains… apparently we’ve been in a cold war for some time now.

:laughing:

Tying consequences to one doesn’t mean not tying them to others. As I stated, Republicans are simply more Capitalistic than Democrats, a matter of extents once more, which I explicitly stated.

Your fallacy is affirming a disjunct, so no, your “expectation” was as invalid as your conclusion.

Add to that a relevance fallacy with your mention of “your own failures”.

.
Thanks man :slight_smile:

I can verify the Kansas failed experiment. I saw a documentary on that.

Failed tax-cut experiment in Kansas should guide national leaders

[i]In rejecting Republican gubernatorial candidate Kris Kobach, who advocated restoration of the Brownback experiment, Kansas voters on Election Day put the final nail in the coffin of what even Republican leaders had come to see as a disastrous set of tax and spending cuts that ruined the Kansas economy.

In 2012 and 2013, Republican Gov. Sam Brownback signed into law the largest tax cuts in Kansas history. The top state income tax rate fell by nearly one-third and passthrough taxes that affected mainly relatively wealthy individuals were eliminated. With the decline in revenues came significant spending cuts in numerous areas.

Brownback’s experiment was such a failure that his party turned against him. In 2017, the Republican-dominated legislature, overriding the governor’s veto, rolled back the tax cuts. [/i]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcLoBdkqxos[/youtube]

I dunno, maybe? If they do, I’m more scared of the tetanus than the mercury.

According to the cdc there is no telling what your jab contained unless you know for sure which vaccine it was cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/dtap-t … ccine.html

The thimerosal supposedly contains the mercury.

Thimerosal is a mercury-based preservative that has been used for decades in the United States in multi-dose vials

Admittedly, I got a lil sick feeling too, but it went away after a day or two.

Yes, the EU’s heavy-handed dictation of every detail would scare me. Or course our system of making guinea pigs of citizens only to receive slaps-on-the-wrist class-action lawsuits afterward isn’t any better. They make billions in profits in exchange for paying $100 million lawsuit.

You’ve no idea what I’ve endured at hospitals which is why I don’t go near them unless visiting other people. I used to have to go for allergy shots weekly after school, which ruined my whole day. And I don’t even have allergies! Never did. What I had was a munchhausen’s syndrome mom.

High five! :smiley:

right on man

I don’t live in your country and I have no stake in your dumbass politics. (In fact if I was considering self-interest, it would probably be better for me if Trump was gone.)

I’m looking at this as an outsider. If I say that you’re not assigning blame correctly, it’s because I really think that you are not assigning blame correctly. You just really, really want to believe that I am biased and you are not biased.

You guys are constantly demonizing conservatives, republicans and the GOP. You whitewash liberals and democrats. You are ridiculously partisan. You have nothing constructive to say. You are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

Which fallacy is this, pompous pedant?

You rang? :mrgreen:

Oh, it’s the same one. At least as far as I’m concerned, I’m not whitewashing anyone. If you hadn’t looked it up, affirming a disjunct is concluding e.g. that if Republicans are stated as guilty then Democrats are not: A|A v B ∴ ¬B

You’re still doing this:

I don’t harbour disrespect for you, phyllo, I seem to remember you being a prominent and valid voice in the science forum a few years ago - my superior in that field.
We’ve fallen on different sides in some recent political topics, though I don’t believe we’re on different sides. I’d like to see some more of what I remember of you, whether you would care to oblige me or not. I apologise for any pomposity behind my pendantry, but I don’t think it’s justifiable for you to be offended by my application of logic to your arguments.

The governator was a republican. Devin Nunes is a republican. I’m sure there are plenty more.

This is like when that CNN freak went to a part of the US border that had a wall and pointed out how no illegal immigration was happening there, ostensibly somehow to rebuke Trump.

It’s like they don’t even notice.

Of course, no serious argument can be made against (much less for) this. It is the argument formation of a preschooler.

Like that beautiful passage, “if everybody prints money at the same time, then you won’t get inflation!”

It’s… It’s really something.

Yet you seem intent on meddling from the comforts of your socialist paradise just the same.

Well duh.

You are biased. You meet a mountain of evidence and continue to dig in, completely undaunted by an ever-growing litany of facts.

Exactly!

It’s borderline tu quoque or “whataboutism” when someone makes a point about A, you say “well what about B?” or “what about you?”

What about democrats? Well what about them? The fact that some of them are conservatives who label themselves democrats means democrats are just as bad?

Hillary Clinton:

[i]She was raised in a politically conservative household,[9] and she helped canvass Chicago’s South Side at age 13 after the very close 1960 U.S. presidential election. She saw evidence of electoral fraud (such as voting list entries showing addresses that were empty lots) against Republican candidate Richard Nixon,[21] and later volunteered to campaign for Republican candidate Barry Goldwater in the U.S. presidential election of 1964.[22]

Rodham’s early political development was shaped mostly by her high school history teacher (like her father, a fervent anti-communist), who introduced her to Goldwater’s The Conscience of a Conservative and by her Methodist youth minister.

In 1965, Rodham enrolled at Wellesley College, where she majored in political science.[24][25] During her freshman year, she served as president of the Wellesley Young Republicans.[26][27] As the leader of this “Rockefeller Republican”-oriented group,[28] she supported the elections of moderate Republicans John Lindsay to Mayor of New York City and Massachusetts Attorney General Edward Brooke to the United States Senate.[29] She later stepped down from this position. In 2003 Clinton would write that her views concerning the American Civil Rights Movement and the Vietnam War were changing in her early college years.[26] In a letter to her youth minister at that time, she described herself as “a mind conservative and a heart liberal”.[30]

To help her better understand her changing political views, Professor Alan Schechter assigned Rodham to intern at the House Republican Conference and she attended the “Wellesley in Washington” summer program.[33] Rodham was invited by moderate New York Republican Representative Charles Goodell to help Governor Nelson Rockefeller’s late-entry campaign for the Republican nomination.[33] Rodham attended the 1968 Republican National Convention in Miami Beach. However, she was upset by the way Richard Nixon’s campaign portrayed Rockefeller and by what she perceived as the convention’s “veiled” racist messages and left the Republican Party for good.[33][/i] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

If not for republican racism, she’d be a republican.

She’s an economic conservative who happens to have a heart for social justice. So for all intents and purposes, she is a conservative. If she wears a democratic badge, so what?

I could paint the same sort of picture of Merkel.

But this is all beside the point that conservative ideals, held and advocated by who-the-hell-ever, are deleterious to the people which is evidenced by anywhere you look and by any metric you choose.

Who said that? :confusion-shrug: Not me. [-X

I said if everyone prints, you won’t get currency devaluation because currencies are valued relative to other currencies.

You have the mistaken notion that money printing is synonymous with price inflation, but you have no idea by what mechanism it possibly could, because you didn’t arrive at that idea as a conclusion, but bought it from a college dropout flunkout asserting economics is just common sense, and now in your endeavor to be praised for your insight, you’re exhibiting your ignorance; a kinda wardrobe malfunction :laughing:

Serendipper:

Oh, please, don’t buy the PR. There are roles to play, like commedia character types, depending on the party. She is certainly neo-con in economic policy and foreign policy, yes. The other stuff is the noises you make if you are a Democrat.

I can believe she has womanly compassion for the oppressed. You don’t think so?

No. I see no reason to believe it. Any, hey, men are capable of empathy. I make no assumptions about a woman politician.

Her husband gutted the social support system and I haven’t heard her criticise that, then or now.
He allowed legislation that put an incredible amount of poor and black in prison. Haven’t heard her criticize that.
He allowed Wall St. to go apeshit. Silent on that.
Her charity was really a way to funnel money toward her.
She supports neo-con moves in foreign policy and that puts poor americans in danger - since they will be the soldiers - and poor foreigners. She’s a hawk.
She has never challenged the policies of the IMF, for example, in the 3rd world.

Given your own thoughts about how horrible the republian policies are for regular people, how can you assume she has empathy when she is essentially for those policies?
Supporting gay rights and other social liberal issues might have more to do with her own social circles than empathy.
And heck, I would guess some republicans supported gay marriage and the like.

I don’t like her either, but all I’m saying is she’s an economic conservative and social liberal. I categorize her as a conservative and see little distinction with any other, except tampons in the mensroom, as if that were a reason to vote for someone. Personally, I’d rather have Trump because he’s a quicker road to Progressiveville than any centrist. I don’t use tampons (except for that time I slashed my leg open and a found a tampon in the glovebox useful, which the nurses at the ER got a big laugh about.)

:laughing:

:astonished:

Now it’s all making sense… I kept telling em it was the preservatives that were gettin me… #-o

…which is why we hope the Government will honour Article 50/the vote to Leave the EU, and give us back control of what goes into our consumerable goods, as that has been taken away from us for decades now.

:laughing:

I’m steering clear of all jabs and processed/articial additive-riddled foods, as I cannot afford to catch a medieval disease… or even current ones for that matter. We find ourselves in troubling times indeed. :eusa-snooty:

I reckon that’s a solution so long as whatever government you end up with is democratic or you’ll be back in the same boat only with the EU as the profiteers of your country’s slave labor like the South would have been in the US had the South won the war. We think it’s bad now with low wages and republican control, just imagine if the South had won their independence; the South would have been the North’s Mexico!

Stay away from homeless communities and standing nails :wink:

And it’s too bad the US won the war against England. All these secessions leading to smaller, less degrees of separation between governed and government. What a bad idea. The Soviet Union should have remained one country.