You pitched I swung and missed. Strike; like 379 but who’s counting. I believe you are giving me way too much credit; given my batting average. Like I can understand half the contributions you have made in this thread. I mean I gotta reach like way out of my reach and all of a sudden I’m grasping at spirits. I don’t believe in spirits, which makes the whole notion of grasping for them rather absurd. (maybe way out there and far misunderstood, and beyond my capacity for understanding, so far… sorta of hoping chance swings in my favor, but what are those odds.)
You have managed to participate with me for some time. Thanks. As the moment by moment clock ticks your presence, is noticed. I have come to the opinion the notion of friend has become far too political and is used for reason friendship should never have been corrupted by. It’s a lame label anyway. Better to recognize a kinship of sorts. Chance and change and the immutable,just forces me to cut you some slack in anything considered. I’ll think for days on it.
Here’s my problem. Reason. I don’t believe any law exists in the universe that can’t have experimental data that backs up the hypothesis. Maybe I haven’t been around the block as much as you. Life experience and all, certainly different by fathoms but I’ve lived my experiment, I have collected the data, I am certain You, Ecmandu, URwronx1000 and the Greatest I Am, as well as including Phenomenal Graffiti and Carleas in the quantification, are rather unique thinkers, and beyond Carleas, no one has provided so much as an experiment or presented data that any of us can perform or independently investigate any substantiate for their claims, A thesis comes far closer. I guess that strange twist of never ending change in combination with the immutable is going to have this [individually singular, haven’t yet the requirement of general acceptance results.] The genius of it lies in the capacity to prove the claims. You gotta get really close to it for a really long time and perspire with it. I believe that god itself could spend several lifetimes here on earth and succeed in far less. Sort of that whole notion of never ending change and the immutable interaction.
I get so frustrated that I can not translate even the experiential data I’ve managed to collect into an experiment anyone else can perform to reach the same conclusion. Any law proposed must be experimentally verifiable. It has to fulfill the quality of commonality of experience in a experimentally testable fashion. “WE” have to access to the same data that a “WE” can become a we that can use this “law” beneficially, predictably.
Come on, does not a retrospect of our history provide substantial evidence to support the hypothesis? >what ever code is required to make the banana dance here inserted<
Hey MagsJ. a merry mowk as a permutation of perception is hypothetically possible, accepting the hypothesis of distortions present in the experiential continuum.
Take care now, to the who and why are which people pitching what shit for what reason?
We can throw all sorts of hypothesis out there, the ones that survive have become testable.
Hypothesis: A distortion exists in the experiential continuum. How does one design an experiment to validate such a hypothesis? Can’t answer that question… then you have done less than 1% of the work required.
Waxing poetic inspires, but somebody still has to do the dirty.