Dutch Divorce Rate Skyrockets In Response To Alimony Reform

Urwrongx1000 · December 17, 2019, 6:46am

Well-said

Urwrongx1000 · December 17, 2019, 6:49am

Gloominary has said, several times, countless times, that females are different.

Can you read?

Aegean · December 17, 2019, 11:58am

I presume that what looks different, behaves differently, smells, feels, sounds different, must be ….the same.

Classic neo-Liberal “logic”.
This, of course, only applies to humans, because if it applies to all life then Evolution Theory is debunked, and we’re back to Abrahamic Cosmo-theory.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 2:21pm

I’ve talked to enough women in a single lifetime to assess that a majority of women are the same across the whole full spectrum.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 2:22pm

Today I’ve come up with a new label, 'biological natural prostitutes ’ or ‘BNP’ for short regarding women.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 2:27pm

Gloominary:

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Of course women are selfish, they put themselves (and their children) first and others second or not at all, just as men are selfish.
Women fantasize about being with handsome, charming and capable men, just as men fantasize about being with charming, beautiful and capable women.
Women look for good protectors and providers, whereas men look for good nurturers.
If a woman winds up with an ugly, broke bloke, it’s because she’s settling, she doesn’t think she can do much better or her bio-clock’s ticking, she doesn’t have a lot of time left

If a guy loses his job, becomes an alcoholic or otherwise takes a step or two further down the socioeconomic ladder than where he was when she met him, or conversely if she manages to improve herself or run into some money, then there’s a good chance she’ll leave him for something better, even if they invested a lot in each other (and their kids), and of course the courts are skewed in favor of women, further enticing them.
On the other hand, she may just try to bang some other dude on the side.

Women aren’t uniquely selfish in relationships or anything, it’s just their selfishness manifests a bit differently.

The trouble isn’t women so much as female supremacism, the notion women are somehow more altruistic and capable than men, that men are oppressors, which was sold to men and women by the elite for various reasons, whatever they may be, like divide and conquer, break up the family so as to make us more dependent on the state, like population reduction, like keeping women busy with careers, since much of their traditional work was made easier by machines, like making men docile, tame, henpecked and pussy-whipped, so they won’t rise up and defend what’s rightfully theirs.

I think the principle reason is the Jew needs to keep this idea women and minorities have been somehow historically held back going, in order for him to justify his leaching off society, so it’s impossible to criticize him for it.
As long the white man is full of white male guilt, he’ll never rise up and take back what’s rightfully his from the Jew and his minions.

It’s more than reproduction or children, the fact that women’s sexual instinctual impetus is always drawn to men’s power, dominance, affluence, and social standing ensures that there will always be human inequality, violence, and conflict. This is why sexual equality is fucking ridiculous because there is no reproductive equality, without reproductive equality there can never be any kind of sexual equality between men and women. Even more interesting is how modern feminism discusses sexual equality yet completely ignores reproductive inequality or how women’s sexual reproductive behavior is always predicated on the continuance of male social inequality itself.

I don’t think women are much less faithful to men than men women.
Insofar as statistics can be trusted, women initiate about two thirds of divorces, but men commit about two thirds of adulteries.
If we took away women’s legal advantages (abolish child and spousal support, etcetera), they’d probably initiate divorce about as often as men, perhaps even less often.
I don’t think it’s necessary to change or reduce women’s status to that of big children or slaves in order to keep them loyal to men.
What I advocate is full legal equality between men and women.

However, once they have a taste of true equality, many of them may prefer to be treated like big children, where they have more positive rights (freedom from poverty and so on), but fewer negative rights (freedom of choice and so forth), where they’re under the care or guardianship of men (fathers, brothers and/or husbands, etcetera) and/or the state.
Perhaps we could give women a choice, collectively/democratically or as individuals, whether they want the same rights as men or exchange some negative rights for positive ones, but they shouldn’t be given more of both like they are today, nor should they be given fewer of both, like property or slaves.
I’m not a misandrist, but I’m not a misogynist either, women are of course different in some ways, different strengths, weaknesses, needs, but they’re not better or worse.

Women will never go for any of that voluntarily.

It’s like an old saying I’ve come to understand, "Don’t ever count on a woman to volunteer herself for a lifestyle with less entitlements or a lesser standard of living especially after she’s acquired the opposite.

No, there is only forcing women to meet such terms as your pathetic democracy is unable and inefficient to convene what is necessary.

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 3:38pm

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 3:40pm

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

There’s only one way to change things and your democracy isn’t the answer Gloominary.

One of these days you’ll see things my way, that I’m certain of. Give it time

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 3:59pm

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

And to top it off, women have the audacity and nerve to call this, oppression.

And millions of soy boys and white knights believe it.

Unbelievable

Of course some of them are just playing along, and that’s part of how men play women.

Women and men play each other, but men don’t have the system behind them.

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:03pm

Gloominary:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

And to top it off, women have the audacity and nerve to call this, oppression.

And millions of soy boys and white knights believe it.

Unbelievable

Of course some of them are just playing along, and that’s part of how men play women.

Women and men play each other, but men don’t have the system behind them.

If this is oppression, I hope I never live to see what the, emancipation of women looks like.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:03pm

Gloominary:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

And to top it off, women have the audacity and nerve to call this, oppression.

And millions of soy boys and white knights believe it.

Unbelievable

Of course some of them are just playing along, and that’s part of how men play women.

Women and men play each other, but men don’t have the system behind them.

In the history of humanity men will say or do anything to acquire pussy, a known fact. Hence all the soyboys and white knights nowadays. I just can’t stoop myself to that level, when I eventually do acquire myself a trophy wife [fulltime professional hired prostitute for cash money] to breed with it will be on my terms, not theirs.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:10pm

I normally don’t like colored people’s music, however in the eternal words of Tina Turner, “What’s love got to do with it”?!

She knew…

Today’s music doesn’t convey that type of honesty anymore.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1avX1lX7gSs[/youtube]

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:14pm

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

There’s only one way to change things and your democracy isn’t the answer Gloominary.

One of these days you’ll see things my way, that I’m certain of. Give it time

You’re probably right, but I hope you’re wrong, because a rightwing dictatorship would disempower us in many ways, but of course empower us in others.
It’s a trade off.
If we can’t have illiberal democracy, then I’ll go for autocracy.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:20pm

Gloominary:

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

There’s only one way to change things and your democracy isn’t the answer Gloominary.

One of these days you’ll see things my way, that I’m certain of. Give it time

You’re probably right, but I hope you’re wrong, because a rightwing dictatorship would disempower us in many ways, but of course empower us in others.
It’s a trade off.
If we can’t have illiberal democracy, then I’ll go for autocracy.

You will come to see my way of things soon enough my dark sith apprentice.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dATuq8O3920[/youtube]

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:20pm

Zero_Sum:

Gloominary:

Gloominary:

Alimony and no-fault divorce make things really easy for women.
A lot of women will marry or cohabit with a working or lower middle class guy for a while.
They may even have a kid or two of, his (we hope).
Then, if he’s failing to move up the socioeconomic ladder or if he’s just not physically attractive or charming enough and she’s got looks and charm, she’ll dump him, take much or most of what he has, raising her socioeconomic status in the process, and try to go after a middle or upperclass guy.
She may even date the middle or upperclass guy while she’s still with the working or lower middle class guy before moving in with and marrying him.
The working or lower middle class shmuck will pay spousal (and child) support for years while she gets to enjoy a higher standard of living on top of it.
She may even try to raise her status in this way a third or fourth time, why not?
Let’s face it, the system is rigged in favor of women, caters to their most ignoble instincts, and they wouldn’t be able to rig it without the gullibility and naivete of men, and the twin ideologies of feminism and chivalry.

And to top it off, women have the audacity and nerve to call this, oppression.

And millions of soy boys and white knights believe it.

Unbelievable

Of course some of them are just playing along, and that’s part of how men play women.

Women and men play each other, but men don’t have the system behind them.

In the history of humanity men will say or do anything to acquire pussy, a known fact. Hence all the soyboys and white knights nowadays. I just can’t stoop myself to that level, when I eventually do acquire myself a trophy wife [fulltime professional hired prostitute for cash money] to breed with it will be on my terms, not theirs.

It’s unfortunate men would rather compete than organize for their interests.
Everyone else is organized for their interests except white men, but sooner or later that’ll change.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:26pm

The inevitable collapse of nations, societies, and civilizations throughout the west basically will achieve that.

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:37pm

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:40pm

I agree, within every tragedy lies some opportunity.
White men had it pretty good for a while.
Things will have to get pretty bad before there’s a backlash.

Gloominary · December 17, 2019, 4:50pm

The feminists, plutocrats and progressives won’t stop, they just keep pushing and pushing.
Something’s gotta give sooner or later.

Mr_J · December 17, 2019, 4:57pm

Very soon it will arrive.