Aegean wrote:
"
To understand this difference one must understand the relationship of genes to memes.
Memes emerge from genes, but in Nihilism memes attempt to produce genes - its called social engineering. Nihilism is an inversion. Culture does not emerge from a genetic population as an indication of a relationship with reality, but memes cultivate genetic traits; cultivating them according to the memetic ideal, to manufacture a genetic type.
This is how Jews can use their own identity as a form of obscurantism, just as they do with language. Their narrative of ‘being chosen’ by a god that was rejected by all other tribes, alludes to nihilism. The nihilistic one-god was rejected, and they embraced and integrated it into their survival strategy (parasitism).
Like I said, nobody invented nihilism, because it is a natural by-product of emerging self-consciousness seeking relief in abstractions. But nihilism has been given form, given a spiritual or political framework, to exploit and manipulate it in the masses. It has become political and marketing.
Much, much, more can be said about this topic…it is interesting and intricate, but easily understood by an honest mind."
{* this is propositional, in a sense of.an anti-derivitive. The assemblage of acquired characteristics is not a nominal process, and it is contradictory in the beginning of each reducible epoch.
It means it never really begins, or ends, propositionally or retroactively.
To say one is as.valid as the other , is to imply a third, nihilism. But the great.crisis in thought dis not occur until the 16th century, in the days coming out of.darkness. That darkness.aligned with the original epoch of the cave, and hence it’s trajectory was well defined among the scholastics. Even the crucifixion was a midterm in defining it’s projective and objective paradigm.
To misidentifie a previous effected state, having no obvious connection of a classic one, is to try to identify and distinguish the pre classical , pre Socratic elements from it’s modern counterparts.
There are no prophetic notions of separatibility from oracles that can draw but a direct line toward an objective synthesis of elements.
It’s concern is most revealing in hermeticism, and surrealism, like it or not.
It is merely as opinionated as it pretends not to be. That is the failure of the eye.}*
The eye, prehistorically differentiated between species inter-alia, and hence, it could not project or object to construction or equally to deconstruction, in spite, of memetic considerations .
How come? If the ideal type should predicate and conquer reality, then the Oracle , of there was.one, would conquer in an absolute sense
That it did not, does not either assert nor negate the linguistic primary indication of procedural over formal adjudication.
However , there is balance and shifts which change the position the fulcrum shift, and that becomes strictly non arguable within that epoche.
The power to will does consume the slaves, but that power also is enslaved by the higher types of genetic endowment, regardless of it’s lineage. The unexpected mutation undermines the possibility of engagement rhetorically , and all matters of discourse advocating otherwise point to the naive reassembledge.}
Indicates personal views