It’s bizarre to you. So, it must be bizarre to others as well?
My interest in Buddhism, as with my interest in religion as a whole, revolves almost entirely around how someone’s beliefs/faith precipitate particular sets of behaviors in their interactions with others from day to day…behaviors thought to be in alignment with that which someone imagines or wishes his or her fate to be on the other side.
Who here, besides new members, doesn’t know that by now?
In regard to the coronavirus, either karma and enlightenment factor into the behaviors chosen here and now by Buddhists or they don’t. As that is factored into their thinking about “I” on the other side.
That is where I wish to take the exchange. If others do not, they should clearly move on to others. No hard feelings.
Huh? He seemed to clearly be making a distinction between going about the business of walking, eating, washing and sitting down more or less mindlessly and, then, as a more enlightened sort, doing these things more “mindfully”.
Okay, how is this distinction made by him in regard to human interactions swirling around coronavirus and abortion? Given his present understanding of Buddhism.
The rest is just you further explaining me – pinning me down – in a manner in which I don’t recognize at all.
And how bizarre is that, right?