I get You, and it is not really a choice on a schematically conscious level, the choice may not necessarily present it’s self in a nominal level of either this or that, for if You concur with the cyclically that Nietzche presents in an eternal reconfirmation, then the contextual derivation of either concentrating on the points raised, or rather the raised points OR, the unfulfilled spaces between them- become mute by perhaps the following analogy, or rather demonstration.
Suppose that existence is like a film and the film runs at variable velocities.
The stills that constitute the action become more realistic, when a specified frames per unit of time is achieved.
It doesent mean that the stills have disappeared, only that the simulation becomes closer to the actual appearance.
A slowdown will shift awareness toward an unintended shift of focus toward the spaces between the objects. A speedup will tend to reconstruct awareness to focus on the Gestapo apprehension of the whole field. and minimize the tendency toward deconstruction of the objective , without breaking down the more general framework of conscious apprehension, but with almost a imperceptible introduction of the use of deliberate intention, to slow down the myriad particles within that frame: so as to re-create an original or at least a more general and authentic awareness.
Time appears to shorten the spatial-objective frequency, creating blur at first, then clarity at certain velocities.
De construction works the same way, except there is an unfounded will to slow it down, because certain limits are being reached.
Technology shortens appearent time, by creating constructed simulation, and deconstruction may be a more naturally processed unwillful participation.
The whole development of the will as a constructed metaphor, shows this struggle , and the antithesis of romantic idealism is grounded in-it’s self.
Deconstruction shows an emphasis in a return to the thesis, and that idea goes way back.
Can’t argue temporarily, that two thousand years overrides 200 years of modern science either, because for the same reason that Einstein’s disconnect in relativity: or the relational summation of value between them.