The differentiation which create personal identity are based on periodical oscillations from seen and unseen sources, the material world differentiates via those who have more ‘material’ from those who have less.
The accumulation of wealth distinguishes people to be ‘seen’ , perceived as more individual, noticeable, etc.
The indigent are hardly noticed.
The immaterial world consisting of very broad types, fall into the indistinguishable category, and the strife toward notice becomes an archytypical process.
The fear of unnoticed is tantamount to diminished indication of notice, and that is tantamount to a kind of death.
Now, the evolution of ideas parallels these processes, and so Freud can argue for the unhappiness caused by sexual repression, for instance. The psychology of the ego, based on identifiable cues, do have a deeper social significance.
We are what we are thought, not what we eat.
Eating deals with the concern we have over our material needs, not our sense of predicated attributions of ideas associated with wants. Our spiritual wants, ironically, and actually are far more important factors , thus the thirst for knowledge, in times of crisis, or a critical examination of our circumstances, is much more formative. - The formation a of these pre-determined, -(and maybe they are more of a comparative defensive act)-
Ideas, are again , far more consequential then the shorter term hassles that accompany the necessity of pro during our daily bread.
The culmination of these processes lead to the conclusion that it is more expedient to fight with the pen, then the hand. Survival, thus, evolves through a series of rationalization that the pen comes up with, and others are obliged to follow, since the power of the pen, of the mind becomes able to force a subservience upon those who lack real knowledge of them.
The multitude learns by repetitious, rote learning, and so are at a disadvantage.
This subservient general ego, is what Freud observed to be unhappy, and lets face it, sexual unhappiness is what’s it all about-an overcoming of generational issues stemming on overcoming genetic inferiority.
In am attempt not to go far afield, lets get back to the more general thesis.
The evolution of social consciousness , has been periodically modified, revised, and at some critical moments, totally changed course. The material world can be said to have been upended, and reversely, albeit more often and with more persistence, reversely.
Generally the ideas which appear as defensive, are really formative. The precepts underlying current manifestations, are clothed as if they were transitory, thereby offering the suggestion of overwhelming social concurrence.
Yet, how far from the truth does the 'working class’s , the prolayariate has to opine the likeness of the Russian bear , led around the ring with a metal ring and a chain around it’s nose?
We are what we are, and not what we eat. Our food supply can vanish overnight, and yet we have to live on , on a minimal diet, near starvation, so as to perpetuate that formal evolutionary script, that has replaced the urge, by which we learned to determine the manifold available choices, to the justified ends that prescribes our bills of rights to our basic needs. In short, a prescription to the modus operandi of our lives.
What prescription is there in material accumulation for it’s own sake, that has become an overwhelming theme of our existence? (As opposed to a conceptual levity in art for it’s own sake? ).
The philosophy of language, prescribed and underwites this naive approach, sealing any chance of return, eternal or not, to it’s forgotten subscription. This obsession with the material benediction of the immediate, nihilized any chance of return, thus apparently sealing the fate of the vast majority in regaining the basic wants , the lifeblood of thematic protection against the very inception of , and the formation of very basic tool of adaptation against foes, who may impede protective measures to survival against more powerfully built genetically superior foes.
Now to the chase. -what gets to be known, is, that has been learned exegenically, through a combined reified idea, with those in process, and as such, it should come to no one’s surprise, if procedural changes do occur. In times of crisis, a suspension of belief leads some to consider that, opportunities to revise held opinions, be they of short, or longer duration.
The history of anti dialectical thinking, is it’s self a material re-formation of the very primal essential ideology, which , if, deducted, or reduced to it’s original preception , is tantamount to the very same bicameral mind in it’s ‘self’, the very essence that has become subservient To Its Self.
At this level the exogenic (exterior) effects become autonomous with the indicated, inherent, pre-formative sources, hence producing phenomenal shrinkage or expansions, -the very phenomenal myths that either result progressive expansion of ideal a-priori types, or, the opposite, of delimitong delimiting associative inducements into the anti-ideal.
This clash ultimately produces the coming of an informative singular event, a singularity akin to cosmic effects, such as a star-collapse into black holes, so compact, as to induce tunnels of reality links.
These tunnels, are the very representative forms of the nice I-channelling of the brain, and the outer and inner sourced objectives can reverse course in an in put and out put manner.
Biofeedback between the outer shell and the inner core of reality firm a high wired nexus here, and it becomes quantum linked to an evolving paradigmn, whose evolution is simulated.
The occult connects the simulation with the paradigmn, and the singularwithin the bounds of relative faith, as identity is a production within approachable limits of comprehension, (as Cantor, Leibnitz , Nietzche, Jesus Buddha came very close to comprehend.)
Jesus was right, and closest in proclaiming that if this process can be learned, even if taken on face value, ONE can never die.