Karpel Tunnel said:
“haven’t seen much interest in either Iamb or Meno for example in the possibility of a conspiracy potentially being behind events that HAVE actually happened. But they are interested in speculation about the conspiracy behind and event that has not happened.”
Both sides of the political spectrum are playing for an optical veracity below the level probability, and so, the regress toward certainty is heard from both-right and left, within understandable limits that are credible up to certainty.
Therefore all pronouncements are merely based on variable probability, and while the regression is dynamically unrelenting, -a parallel anti dynamic is taking place: with an inversive process of degrees of conspiratorial charges reigning each other inward, leading toward das sein.
I think it’s credible to presume a ontological frame, while fishing for more extended frames of reference, within it’s ontic counterpart , because they have inverse presumeable inverse effects , .
That both can not play the intended roles simultaneously, is tantamount to the historical aspects of results that are effected by the failure of material dialectical maneuverability.
For both states have to interact on some level, but which is not available within say, a unitary field.
The either/or, one or the other state , has never really been shown as workable, except maybe within the realms of naive realism, which necessarily reduces any interpretation Into it’self , within the continuum of degrading languages , including the strictly codal ones of near certainty.
This is why the suspicion , that nearing the informationally redundant singularity, limits the size of microchips that can adapt more and more interphase information .
This conversion of both - the quantitative aspect, and the condition which can qualify to program that, appears to make a sense, commonly tend to increase function within heuristic criteria.
The resultant state of affairs of this conflict, can only work , if the scepter of over and/or undervaluation , not destroy the over all credibility of program models.
A guess maybe as good as any other.
Again,
“haven’t seen much interest in either Iamb or Meno for example in the possibility of a conspiracy potentially being behind events that HAVE actually happened. But they are interested in speculation about the conspiracy behind and event that has not happened.”
The ‘reason’ relies on an upper limit threshold, where any other justification dissolves below it into an ambiguous state of mixing levels of languages not meshing , expecting intensional usage to form sense data, the very kind that fails to convince naive realists that no, ‘it is not conpiratorial’
Such convictions can not be apprehended within temporally present certainty, since the elements of conjecture have opined only unilaterally in the present.
The reactions to literal conjectures in the present , have not yet manifested a unitary and leveling meaning , between how the antithesis will be effected, whereby, a thetic understanding begs for an intentional response to form the synthetic unity.
This state in past conspiracies , does not ‘evolve’ into a higher understanding either, giving marketability to books like, ‘None dare call it a Conpiracy’. But at least such can begin to open the avenues which can start to fathom the extent of logistics involved.
I guess, that is why the sealing of supposedly great historically significant mysteries has been mandated by the government.
The ‘conpiracies’ surrounding the JFK assassination is a prime example .
The investigative committee’s results have been judged as conspiracies themselves to undermine suspicion that the suspected foul play was initiated from within the highest places of the U.S. government.
Therefore what inquiry into a past suspected conspiracy has itself been revised, hardened, and the marginal lines asserted, some of those can not really be finalized, definitive proofs gone cold, with the participiant witnesses gone or silenced.
Current suspected conspiracies are kind of ongoing works in progress, soft it’self that a quantum awareness of them can actually change opinions regarding to the merits of holding on to certain suppositions against others.
Current infiltration of conspiracies are in a sense, more alive, and having a potential to change course.