Ok that far. But that uncaused mind, Who can communicate to Man logically , I suppose to best understand-to be understood, failed phenomenally.
The proof was not understood, and the history of philosophy failed to confirm it or confirm to it.
Factually, the proof should have turned men’s heart into faith, and even the Second Covenant and subsequent Godly sacrifice, ( which confirms Cantor’s and Nietzhe’s attempt to interject & extract meaning through that miniscule nonsense aptly analogies -scintilla of evidence, (( the mysteries and the occasional miracles)) : did not confirm God’s detached logic to advance His existence.
So a proof , which proposes to prove God’s existence does nothing more then reestablish a representation of a noumina, that may be intuited by some like the hermits and saints and disciples .
The scholastic proof failed miserably, and the road to faith is littered by victims who retrospectively may be called rebels without a cause.
Literally, an uncaused cause cries out in the desert.-Absalom, absurdum!
As it stands, cosmology without an ontology, is like a archaic desert, that while it may, it is correct, and offers a very widely cast net of prophetic viability, fails to sustain God’s credo, at least in the restricted sense of Western cultural history.
The failure does not mean that the day of reckoning may not come, but as history so often continuously proves: it will be put down as another excercise to try to differentiate between coincidence and preminating foregone conclusion based on mystical experience.
So John, You may have convinced me, but the others who have buried an ancient Truism, only history can attest to those glimmers of enlightment.
At that hour, when what is written to happen does, no one except a simulated intelligence will be able to be testament to the written word.