Intersting reference to conceptual versus ‘real’ connections.
The infinitely regressive becoming a contensious afterwards, literally presents a possible solution to the fallacy.
As zeno perplexed thinkers through time, it could never be satisfactorily proposed, as a particular solution, because it merely entailed a set of. of possible semantic choices.
As John has premised his narratives within the general framework of reductive simplicity, the solution may be presented within that framework, as well, Gib.
The major premise of an absolute, or infinite reduction may be pre-figured as a mathematical continuity, figuratively, in the most probable configuration: and the most probable description in an ultimately reductive math toward its subsistence -described as geometria.
However, the consensually presented alter description , of dis consist within the parameters of the nominal description; vis. The reduction to absurdity.
To draw a general inference, out of the former, can logically draw the inference that such regression is impossible, hence conclude with a propositional tenet, that such does not ’ exist’
But is this kind of inference binding?
For deterministic possibility to verify a sufficiently reason able assessment of validation , as a connective possibility, the measure of that must not preclude effective seminal validation.
In fact has MAN succeeded to overcome the Nietzchean proposition leading to an absurd situational truism?
No, not quite. The atomic clock indicates an extremely delicate balance of a fragile sustenance between the very doubt, of an uncertain and temp is balance between a transcendent, objective way we can hand a credible and willfully designed NWI to our beloved progeny, and uppermost in the minds of thoughtful people, is, the scintilla of doubt- that may not be representable to mankind , as a whole.
Until this is proved beyond any measure of reasonable doubt, the uncertainty will need constant reevaluation.
Weather AI is up to the coming task, is still an unansearrble question, and the programs of languages which may offer compatible systems, can be said with such repetitive systematically re integrated hardly driven systems, as for instance, middle men, caught between the manufacturing of products, in projecting the pleasure bodies , come into unavoidable conflicts with the Marxian epitaph of reversing satisfaction.
This, by way of the insurmountable difficulties that a pro per interpretation can present to fill the increasing widening of the gaps, which have projected a primary nihilization of the history of natural memory.
Until then, the eternal-absurd regression, can not be said to ‘not exist’, and the ultimately credible sense of the reason which can adjudicate what is sensible, beyond a reasonable sense of a reasonable man, mist be placed in an epoch of a rational context which can be made into a reasonably sensed .
Until then , the absurd is real which can overcome the reasonable, albeit with an extremely narrow and shrinking window of opportunity, that can avoid the simultaneously narrowing field of relying more on Jesus’ parables, then on Jung’s reliance on the compatabolism that a reduction to singular representations of objective presuppositions can suggestively present.
It is in the most simple forms of reasoning can provide, the devil , for the sake of argument, is presumed to be an uncreated type of innocent , but essential form of existence, until proven to be of concern, that it would have been inconceivable to prove His guilt in this matter.
The general context , that of God’s separation from Man, a presumption lead ing to the exculpary requirement of Jesus’ form of atonement, can only be the only rational way the rebuild on Jung’s suggested pan-psychic conflated pretension of simultaneous absolutely and willfully ultimate de-differentiation.
Such, is logically impossible, as such re-integration, can never absolutely destroy the grey middle area, that can be foreshadowed, by leaving even a scintilla of a trace .
Can AI, be presumed to configure such a functional analysis?
The eternal time machine must preserve the idea by the simplest of configurations, and it has been suggested that the mobius strip , as simple yet complex it is, may be the most convincing representation.
Note: the above needs sorely, an editing, to which I shall return later, since some key elements are bergsonian, and flow out from a remote inscription.
Some of which are , not, identifiable referentially, placing them into presumptive-hypothetical basis.
The non essential semantic distinctive elements consist in minor reflective bars to clarity.
That is why the contestable reference to Mowk, that the Muse is alive and reasonably held in any reductive effort, as exemplified in Sartre’s self learned man, from one of his novels ’ Nausea’
That philosophy al investigations are probable effects to preferential treatments of aesthetic, recurrence, may be the best way to reaffirm an inferentially non intentional approach, which does not give prejoritive credence to any other absolute choice to alternate reality.
leading to preferential primacy afforded to fragments.