lost 3 games in a row to a 1400s douchebag, then beat this 1600s noble sir twice. this play here at the end is super deadly, look at the pawnfront on the left. I mean em, king, no - q I cant remember if I was back or white.
lol I was breaching this suckers defences easily and then in move 10 I looked at his rating and like a damned blockhead decide against the offensive bishop move to block the queen WHICH WAS A MATE IN ONE THREAT and moved a pawn up instead. lichess.org/M3Ps26XByM1r
If I had put the bishop on b4 as shown here, what is black to do? He cant defend either with the rook or the queen because of the nasty white square bishop I had placed on his kingside.
“Okay an actual question, I have to do some actual research now.”
You’re supposed to do the research before you make this assessment. As you state it, the chess players who are ‘done fairly quickly’ do so because they have mars-sun combinations.
“We’d be done fairly quickly; chess payers have Mars-Sun combinations.”
Now what if you discovered that more chess players than not who are ‘done fairly quickly’ have no Mars-sun combinations?
You’d have to publicly retract your thesis and you’d loss all credibility in the eyes of professional astrologers.
Always do your research first, son. Even if what you are practicing is pseudo-science, you should still adhere to the proper rules of induction and experiment.