And how hard is it to understand that my preference is to take intellectual contraptions like this and explore them more substantively in regard to human interactions that come into conflict as a result of different assessments of God and religion. And, then, insofar as these assessments lead one to choose a moral narrative here and now in preparation for one’s fate there and then.
Arguments I make in that discussion you can defend as either reasonable or attack as unreasonable.
Or, from my frame of mind, at least be more honest with yourself and ask why you seem so reluctant to go there.
Note to others:
Would anyone else be willing to exchange points of view regarding the main intention of this thread: to connect the dots between the behaviors they choose on this side of the grave as that is intertwined existentially with their belief about the fate of their soul/self on the other side of the grave.
That way Felix can level his accusations against me as they pertain to a set of circumstances we are all likely to be familiar with.