Muse On.
And among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If we believe in these principals of United States Citizens the idea reciprocally applies to all humans whether they are US citizens or not. If humans have an inalienable right to life, how can we condone capital punishment? A right to life… should have protected the black slave from being lynched by a white mob with a rope and a tree handy near by. We should not have required an amendment to the constitution for that thought to be true. It is, after all, thought to be self evident.
Justice is replaced with revenge when the sight of that principle is lost.
On a similar vain, what right do I have as a citizen of the United States to deny another some presumed to be self evidently inalienable right? Love of other is tied into individual happiness. I have zero right, to condemn one human’s love of another human regardless of gender. We shouldn’t have needed an amendment to the constitution to insure that either. Follow the reasonable extension implicit in inalienable rights that are NOT limited to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but are rights among them.