Since you are utterly oblivious to how foolish I am able make you appear here, I don’t expect it to.
And I certainly don’t want it to. 
No dice?
Surely, you will not be foolish enough to take this back to the philosophy board? There, above all, you expose just how shallow your thinking can become.
No dice?
We’ll need a context of course.
How about…the 2nd Amendment?
Now, you insist that I insist that “it is either genes, memes, or a combination of the two, a paradigm introduced by Dawkins. And you state this is true objectively for everyone.”
Cite examples from this thread and from the 2nd Amendment thread of what you think I mean by a complex combination of genes and memes in regard to a particular individual’s reaction to the 2nd Amendment.
What in particular are you claiming that I am claiming is true objectively “for everyone”?
Good call. If you are going to embarrass yourself further, it’s best to stick with your own tedious rendition of zinnat’s “groots”. 
All I am asking you is to deliver your reasoning behind this objectivist paradigm.
Why you would so staunchly refuse to do so, I leave to the reader to decide.
But it does make you a coward.
Okay, perhaps, but what does an idiotic post like this make you?
Again:
Roll the dice my friend. Actually put your intellect on the line.
Finally, make phoneutria proud of you!!!
Oh, and just out of curiosity, what do you know about this:
Are you the reason she is so pissed off at the world?
Well, but here is the thing.
I didn’t posit the gene meme paradigm as objectively true for everyone. You did.
And so
just because you call me something doesnt mean thats what i am
refusing to lick trumps boots doesnt make someone communist
Hey, at least I don’t straight up insult you like you do us.
I just call you what you are, that you refuse to admit, because you know it’s shameful.
But it is what you are. You are a commie.
Again, I challenge you to point to specific things I posted establishing that “in fact” this is what I “posited”.
I mean, come on, in regard to the role that genes and memes play in all of our lives, you can’t really be as stupid as this makes you appear.
Unless, of course, you are just a character that phoneutria plays in her own rendition of a “production”.
I mean, wow, sometimes I think, “Holy Shit, what if phoneutria is really Rebecca playing me here!”
feel free its fine really
Don’t mind if I do.
I asked you to pick one. For example, in regard to something you did today. There are the parts derived from nature. The parts derived from nurture. The parts derived from a more or less complex intertwining of both.
I never argued that this is a “paradigm” that, objectively, every one of us is required to grasp in exactly the same way. The one and the only right way in which to think about why we do the things that we do. That’s what the objectivists like Satyr do.
Now, truth be told, I have almost no interest in exploring what you think about them. Why? Because I have almost no respect at all for your intelligence. As often as not it is just Kidstuff. Silly Kidstuff.
Phoneutria’s intelligence, on the other hand, does pique my interest.
If only because if we ever did sustain an exchange about genes and memes, her contempt for my intelligence would at least revolve around really sophisticated repartee.
I’d love to exchange ripostes with her. The more caustic the better.
I think I could take her there too.
just make it a good one plz
What do you mean? All I’m gonna do is periodically remind you that you’se a commie.
i guess thats fine but i really expected more out of you
No I mean I’m not really that creative.