I think that discussion is just walking into the cloud without a rain coat - you are just going to get wet and still not be able to see where you are.
They want and connive to get total authority - no limits at all - absolute supremacy = socialism/communism.
In a way your first question is related to your second question.
For example -
A liberal “university” rejects discussion of any good relating to conserving constitutional mandates. That is their “bubble of belief” that they support by rejecting any dissenters. That is their “ego”. And so they spread that ego by instilling the same egocentric bias against the opposition - fanaticism (people easily triggered to reject the slightest sign of the wrong narrative - the wrong belief) - ANTIFA, BLM.
A conservative “university” can’t reject discussion without destroying its own beliefs but still weights its judgements on students - degrading or rejecting those too liberal. That is their “ego” - more tolerant but still a self-sustaining bubble of belief.
The lack of free discussion without impugning the participants is what maintains the separation of those bubbles - those egos. So that becomes a “First Amendment” issue. Interestingly the first cause of division happens to be also handled by the First Amendment (no doubt without a lack of wisdom somewhere). So that largely answers your first question but perhaps not definitively.
Socialism/Communism must at all times oppress true free speech (just look at what MSM and social media are doing). They must maintain their bubble of belief - without it they collapse. That is fine unless you propose actual democracy where truth must be allowed into the population - else the authority is not distributed and there is not an actual democracy - at best merely a pretense because the people don’t know how much they are being manipulated.
But this entire post would not be allowed in one bubble yet allowed in the other - maintaining the division.
When they claim that they want to unify is one of the only times they are actually telling the truth. They want everyone to come into their bubble with no exceptions - no division - no independent thought - total unity to allow for total control and supremacy.
When the US Constitution says “God given rights” it means merely rights that are not given by man and thus cannot be taken by man - any man (or group of men). It isn’t actually a religious statement. It is more of a rejection of the authority of men. And socialists/communists cannot tolerate that.
Trump supporters are those who see that distinction and believe (with good reason) that Mr Trump is a constitutionalist and adverse to (out right belligerently opposed to) socialist supreme authority.
Anti-Trump supporters merely hate Mr Trump due to those liberal bubbles producing mindless rejection of anything outside their bubble. Most are not concerned about a constitution or not. They just hate and don’t really know why - hypnotized from they know not where or how.
So addressing the original OP -
They must either -
- Un-hypnotize the liberals, or
- Convince (perhaps hypnotize) the constitutionalists into thinking that totalitarianism is better for all
The hypnotize the constitutionalists thing seems to be their aim - controlling all news media, speech, and entertainment - absorb them into the bubble, into the matrix, into the Borg - or just kill them off with a virus or something.
Controlling speech is controlling belief. Americans are now NOT ALLOWED to believe that they stole the election.
From the other side, since liberal billionaires support those liberal universities, [b]Mr Trump should substantially increase government funding to free-speech universities /b - flood them with it - not to religious conservatives necessarily but to actually provable free-speech universities.
Either way takes time. And it appears there is precious little of that.