Again, a pretty firm description, but…
Before I touch Your aphorism forum, I must add to this outline here.
In ref: to Tyson, only that I got the grnetic/memetic distinction, and in response to that suggestion, I agree totally. The obfuscations arising out of that relative to what we are trying to determine is, that the cultural/racial distinctions were, and are progressively muddled. How distinct the later are and what kind of parallels we can assume from those, post-sriptively, to presumptively , is neither progressively becoming clearer, or appearantly denser.
Both genetic and memetic identification, used as a fulcrums, in neutral, quasi-objective forums, are extremely prone to miscalculation, for either a convex or concave paranthesi distort such ‘objectivity’, …
The past and the future architecture may be distorted whether by semblance of masks or other variable role play; or by ultra modern architecture envisioned by Von-Braun.
Either this it that are merely calculable through imagery, that may approximate some objective criteria.
The universal requirement (as is) can be overcome by the pre-planned objective , not but a kind of wish fulfillment for more and more pleasurable pro life sassumtions, but by the natural, factual focus meta focus, to the pointillistic closeness, where we deliberately get stuck in trees, that describe and overcome the stunning iron clad embrace of the first which we can no longer envision.
Mature requires maximal balance between aesthetic balances, so that man, will not loose his way in that primeval forest, and begin again a long, tortuous trek backward, …
In the very beginning of the cave, all men were nomads. We had no genetic or memetic maps to navigate by, in fact we really did not know what we were. We started to wander, while wondering what human distinctions were all about. The point being , between the cave, Greece, Nietzche and Trump, there was no progressive thought, only miles and miles and miles if bacjlooking gages of where to put sugns, to afford the future ti measures time, in literal generational loops, thinking we were traveling straight.
The linear expansion afforded the luxury to jump claims to land, and set bounderies based on familiaduty, both literal and by way of simulation.
This was the time, when the markers became initial friezes, that set the whole ball if wax rolling, all to the point where the niw familiar Evil Genious put his fit Diane and declared that evil and genius are axiomatic contradictions.
Here started the great inversive transfidmation, and it did need a Nietzche to really expose the futility if Echo’s punishment up in Narcissus.
This may appear moralistically in a minor key, however, it was a pro-found insight not only to rival the Judgement of Paris, but exceed it!
Vanity became the obstacle that unhinged mango a true genious, the vanity that was embedded in human nature, albeit in Nature Herself.
No winder Luther prosted, and drive genius to tears ! Vanity was the animal overcoming animus’ attempt to form her as a subsediary.
The whole sense of the ideal, including it’s precious crown jewel , the romantic udiom, became a mere plaything , without which the very reason did unity if identity could never be encompassed again, at least in this life time.
And what are the practical aspects if this unity? To enhance the boy - child to lengthen his childhood tenure, so that the procrastinate of long childhood can overcome the all to short span of the young animal .
That is why the capital of life, begets a Freudian pleasure pdinciple, and overcomes the theaters of death.
And that establishes a direct cinnection between Nietzche and Freud, whether b be it one of an ‘unconscious’ sort, or a pre-consciou one(Jung)
The tortuous breath and length of this is not meant d I disallow concepts such as free will and freedom and such, only that and with u think You, or someone else I mistook with- pointed out that
determinism can conjure up ideas if preferentially binding relationships;
At Ang rate power and will to power are such reactions to the manor premise sought, that of the optical inversion began with and by an echoed and reechoed punisment, for a crime of self indulgence.
This is a critical point for Nietzche, for Wagner, for, Luther, for all men boys, who are were at least at one point in their life were Narcissistic.
The vanity of existence is the defining point, counterpositioned between the animus and anima, and existentially interfacing being with nothingness. It is a resurrected ideal In Essence, of that ideal, of which the models ought to reposs in a field that elevate that model, by pro-forma applications of projecting a transcendental object, and sustaining it through the energy of sustained and formal architecture ( of the mind) -
The mirrors of childhood, must overcome it’s darkened image, because the beginning stages of Ang further development are impressive totally in it’s late stages, and are the only true and required natural states which can give implicit answers to their own questions regarding their reasons for living.