The New Right

The New Right:

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eC9p-eVYYPM[/youtube]

just another lazy post using video’s as argument…
why even bother to think when I have a video?

Kropotkin

Kropotkin, you’re an adult baby.

ben shapiro doesn’t know that vaginas get wet, and candace owens got dog walked by cardi b last week so good luck with all that

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI4dvc8WeSE[/youtube]

no surprise a drug addict defending a drug addict

Dog walked? I’m not up to speed on Y’alls’ Americanisms.

Edited to add: I looked it up… I don’t think that that’s what happened. Last I read, Cardi retracted inflammatory Tweets when Candace said they were sue-worthy, and Cardi then made out like it never happened… but I think it’s too late for her retraction. :neutral_face:

Mate, the degradation of near-naked over-sexualised young Americans that I’ve been exposed to on Instagram is sickening to watch… though IG is being cleaned up of late, so I guess that that’s what Only Fans is now for, right? I see (via IG) that males are also on there too… interesting. 8-[

the new right is less corporatist and more socialists or at least not less socialist on the economy.
it’s less woke and more conservative or at least not less conservative on society and culture.
lastly it’s both less hawkish and more nationalist.
that being said, most of the new right’s changes have been cosmetic.

as for the left, at this point in time there is no new left in the anglosphere.
the old left are continuing down the path they’ve been on since the Clinton era i.e. woke fascism albeit at an accelerated pace.
had Bernie or Tulsi been elected, perhaps things would’ve been different.

as for Canada, other than draconian covid tyranny, there is no new left or right.

these guys cover things from a more populist perspective: http://www.occidentaldissent.com/

or perhaps had things been different, the populist left would’ve defeated the corporate left.

The “Current” Left exposed themselves for their true nature and intentions the last 4-years.

We have/had a One-party system. The Neo-liberals were no different than the Neo-conservatives. They never were true to their claims, Environmentalism, Anti-war, Anti-corporations, Anti-establishment, etc. That was all a lie, a Big Lie. Instead Liberals immediately jumped into bed with the Neo-conservatives as soon as they had a chance for political power. Trump exposed them all as liars, and the MSM as enemies of the American people. That was Trump’s crowning achievement, exposure of the deep state and of the Media corruption, which serves foreign nations, not our own.

The fact they did, and still do, protect Hunter Biden’s $1 billion equity deal with China, which is selling the US Presidential position for money, direct-trade, proves all opposition and arguments wrong.

China/Communism has infiltrated deeply into the United States. It is pervasive everywhere, which is why there is such cultural rot.

Kropotkin and smears are perfect example of the cultural rot taking hold, by the way, shilling for a foreign nation without even realizing it.

2016 may’ve been the beginning of the end for Reaganism, the dominant wing of American conservatism and the reps for 35 years.
Reaganism had a big impact on liberalism and the dems too.
Reaganism in practice was about cutting taxes and regulations, especially for the rich and big business, even tho the very rich and big business don’t pay taxes and are largely unregulated, without cutting spending, increasing the deficit.
Reaganites cut spending on the poor, not on big business and the military, they increased it on them.
They were in favor of mass immigration, open borders and outsourcing.
They put multinationals and Israel 1st.

As for society and culture, they were moderates, willing to let dems have their way most of the time so long as they could continue selling out America to the highest bidder: China, Israel, the banks, the multinationals…
With HW, W and the neocons things only got worse.
Canada and the UK weren’t immune from Reaganism, we had our equivalent in the form of Mulroney and Thatcher.

What it boils down to is after WW2 the left won the culture war and the right the fiscal war, and both became more corrupt over time, selective in the application of their ideals, putting the elite way ahead of the people.
The Reaganites and neocons need to be ousted from conservatism and the republican party and the populists put back in charge, nationalists who’re fiscally moderate and culturally conservative.
Trumpism was a beginning, not an end, so much more needs to be done.
The 2nd gilded age is here, the 2nd progressive populist age may be upon us.
But the elite are trying to suppress populism with their agenda 2030/global reset (state communism 2.0).
This may lead to a clash and the end of civilization (as we know it).

Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens aren’t the future, they’re the past, by and large they’re Reaganites and neocons, the same ideologies that’ve absolutely gutted America.
Ben Shapiro is pro mandatory vaxx or rather gene mod too, some conservative shakes head.
Where is their populist message?
By and large they don’t have one, all they have to offer is: cut taxes on the rich and slash spending on the poor, oh yea and wokism kind of sux, oh well shrugs.

I agree with most of that.

The above political commentaries represent a bush-back and defense against this “Cancel-Culture”, Anti-Culture business, at least. That’s the real significance of it, the fact that US society, culture, and civilization has degraded and deteriorated to the point of the First Amendment, and revoking Free Speech from the general populace. I do believe in another gilded age, and that the pendulum will swing back. There will be consequences for destroying the integrity of USA’s core principles. The reason why the above pundits are important is because they are popular and cannot be deplatformed. They have their own platforms.

New platforms will build-up the necessary resistance against the Political-Left/Communist takeover.

Anglo-American conservatism and the republican party may be divided into 4 subgroups: Reaganites/neocons, RINOs, paleocons and populists in order of most dominant since Reagan to least.

Reaganites/neocons are fiscally global capitalists (at least in theory, in practice they spend a ton of money they don’t have on the unaccountable ruling class), hawks and socioculturally malleable.

RINOs are fiscally moderate or even global social democrats and socioculturally malleable.
They’re just a bit more conservative than your average liberal, if at all.

Paleocons are fiscally national capitalists (capitalism + protectionism, restricting immigration and restoring national sovereignty).
They’re not hawks, but they’re not doves either, they’re for a strong military, but against nation building and preemptive strikes.
They’re staunch upholders and defenders of the constitution and conservative values (for the death penalty, against abortion, euthanasia, gay marriage…).
Paleocons are the most conservative across the board.

Populists are fiscally moderate or even national social democrats (like paleocons they’re for protectionism, restricting immigration and restoring national sovereignty, but unlike them, they’re for raising wages, social education, healthcare and housing).
Like paleocons they’re for a strong military but won’t use it unnecessarily and they’re staunch protectors of free speech, guns, due process and conservative values.

So who are the new right?
The new right, if there is going to be a new right, are populists and/or paleocons, Reaganites/neocons and/or RINOs, they’re the old right.

There’s also libertarians, they tend to get lumped in with conservatives, but really they’re their own thing.
Liberals may also be broken down into 4 subgroups, more on that some other time.

This is relevant to your recent post:

bitchute.com/video/qRO5Bw7g05Co/

(more later)

I’m going to put this to you very straight forward:

Anyone can accept kidney disease as a disease.

Brain illness has a huge stigma, not only for others that observe it, but for those who have it. They’ll deny it to the ends of the earth.

Trump is mentally ill.

So here’s the deal:

There has never been a president who stood up and gave reason to the population; meaning:

“We live in a negative zero sum reality and those never work, instead of mirroring it, stand out and fight against it with all your might, that’s the difference between homo sapien and human.”

All of our presidents are not respectable to this regard.

UrWrong, you also have a brain illness as does the guy who made that video. It’s not just about what you say, it’s about what you don’t say. It’s not just about what you do, it’s about what you don’t do.

Understand?

Yes, I understand that you have a brain illness.

ben shapiro doesn’t know that vaginas are supposed to get wet

Ben Shapiro is one of the smartest people I have ever witnessed (obviously too far above Mr R for him to see that).

I never really knew what the Old Right was other than general conservatism so I can’t compare it to the New Right.

The New Right seems to be focused on law and order while the New Left is focused on lawlessness and manipulation. And that seems like a traditional position since forever if you look throughout history - sort of a Yin-Yang – Good-Evil – Constructive-Destructive.