Anglo-American conservatism and the republican party may be divided into 4 subgroups: Reaganites/neocons, RINOs, paleocons and populists in order of most dominant since Reagan to least.
Reaganites/neocons are fiscally global capitalists (at least in theory, in practice they spend a ton of money they don’t have on the unaccountable ruling class), hawks and socioculturally malleable.
RINOs are fiscally moderate or even global social democrats and socioculturally malleable.
They’re just a bit more conservative than your average liberal, if at all.
Paleocons are fiscally national capitalists (capitalism + protectionism, restricting immigration and restoring national sovereignty).
They’re not hawks, but they’re not doves either, they’re for a strong military, but against nation building and preemptive strikes.
They’re staunch upholders and defenders of the constitution and conservative values (for the death penalty, against abortion, euthanasia, gay marriage…).
Paleocons are the most conservative across the board.
Populists are fiscally moderate or even national social democrats (like paleocons they’re for protectionism, restricting immigration and restoring national sovereignty, but unlike them, they’re for raising wages, social education, healthcare and housing).
Like paleocons they’re for a strong military but won’t use it unnecessarily and they’re staunch protectors of free speech, guns, due process and conservative values.
So who are the new right?
The new right, if there is going to be a new right, are populists and/or paleocons, Reaganites/neocons and/or RINOs, they’re the old right.
There’s also libertarians, they tend to get lumped in with conservatives, but really they’re their own thing.
Liberals may also be broken down into 4 subgroups, more on that some other time.