I am glad to see everyone astounded and stricken dumb, though I could not resist the urge to add some important text to one paragraph in particular: (From the P.O.D, to the Zothyrians, to the AOE, to the CCRU, to the Gestalt Legacy, to the Nummagrammaticists, to the Hermaedionic Gnostics, to the Sysynphreans… So many groups, all working in a great drama.)
Pabaxis is known as Kattak to the CCRU, while Thoth is incorporated into Thothtodlana. Interestingly, or ‘synchromystically’, we find both of them connected there, just as Kek and Thoth are connected in their roles in service of Yaldabaoth, the Demiurge. Thus: “When the world was born Thothtodlana entered into the secret of the Kattku and – confusing herself with the universe – circled the whole of time. That was when she swam through living flesh, her hunger unlimited and furious. She seemed doomed to devour herself forever. The dead knew no rest, and the earth shuddered. It was then that Ooqvu the worm-witch arrived amongst us. It was Ooqvu that found the pattern in the folds of Thothtodlana’s skin, and followed it back to Tchukululok. It was Ooqvu that called to Thothtodlana from deep in Tchukululok, and released her from the Kattku. That is why we still carry the marks of Ooqvu on our skin.” We should understand the secret of Kattku/Kattak as being the infinite Babel of Pabaxis-Kek, (Does the set of all sets conform entitely the binary recursive function? By this Babel, recall Borges’ Library of Babel. It is filled with every book ever written or that could be written, though also with endless tomes of gibberish- yet it also contains endless volumes in which unknown languages, ciphers, and grammars are outlined, by which any one of these books of gibberish could be deciphered into any other sensible volume. From CCRU documents, describing the great Worm, the ‘Linear-Serpent’ in Hermaedion’s vocabulary: “From micropause research it takes what it needs to grow in the middle, through recursive binary splitting, making a mesh as it spreads, continuously increasing in virulence.” ) which Thoth had first to sift through in order to find the bits of meaning needed to design a world for Yaldabaoth. The CCRU recognized what they called the Kattak-effect, namely, the smallest change that could make the greatest possible difference to a system. By this ‘ectypo-skhismatic’ effect of minimal difference [Note a related group of cybernetic magicians and philosophotypes to add to our tabulation of many, including the CCRU: the Gestalt Legacy Project, who regard the ancient skhisma, as the smallest division of the musical interval that can be processed by the human auditory system, as a kind of sonotypic “pivot-point sigil” which, analytically impermeable, regenerates Thought from its own Impossibility by providing the very analytic modus it cannot be touched, claimed, or conquered by, therein providing, through a kind of ‘exaptive resilience’ in the face of Harman’s ‘epistmological withdraw’ of the Mortonian hyperobject, * (See David Kollar’s “The Art of Shipwrecking, the Information Age and the Rise of Exaptive Resilience”, from “Dialogue and Universalism”, P. 67-84.) a possible escape from ‘automanical sense-slavery’, that is, “an amethodological futuring” in the form of a harmonic suture, ‘recoding machinic blasts from the future left to decay somewhere in the untime’. See Xenolistening, Burch; on Helmholtz’s skhisma, as detailed in his “On the Sensations of Tone”. Secondarily, A Gestalt Biography of Dick Price.] we might regard the transition from Uranian to Saturnal time and those events in which the two respective ‘world-images’ are misaligned in some microscopic way,- such that one might, in exploiting this anomalous misalignment, reach back into their own image in Uranian time from within Saturnal time, modifying it so as to exercise mimetico-magical effects back on the standard timeline,- a process which, at its most refined, was practiced by the Atlanteans as chronoplasty, (the origin of what Zothyrians and Nummagrammatists practiced, having learned from the Atlanteans’ mistakes, as chronosorcery.) even to the end of reaching back far enough into Uranian time (and comprehensively enough) to reshape, not a single man or event, but the entire World itself,- to recut the string of the Beginning and End into a new ‘calendar’ with which to subdue the OECUMENON, to break the jaw and tear the Urobour away from itself,- though it ended in their destruction, for they inadvertently synchromystically resonated the Phanic-echo of the ectromaton across their orthogonal timelines, returning themselves to non-entity in the Sophic achamoth,(losing the thread of their Beginning) or what Lurianic kabbalists would call the empty mirror-world of the DAAT. The reproved and ‘toned down’ version of this form of magic, colloquially designated as chronosorcery, lies mostly, for Zothyrian cultists, in the creation of mimetic time-viroids (like ‘Valis’) through which consciousness can be shepherded across parallel realities and timelines and magickal-affectivity thereby reproduced, recovered, and ‘preserved’, [As CCRU documents say of the AOE, who shares their occult instinct: “The AOE focuses upon a single problem – acknowledging no other – how to reproduce magical power across discontinuity.” In Hermaedionic Gnosticism, the material-imprints left behind by those beings who refused to participate in creation,- those beings who left murmurings of their non-presence in the fetal stages of creation, as represented by the Dogon Egg, are most conspicuously engaged with those who did participate, the Aeons, which are unfolded in a kind of precession, like the Earth itself in 2,000 year periods around the galactic center, in male-female, astro-cthonic pairings, (syzygies) with an initial outpouring of the aionios occupying a primordial split or ‘pairing’ between ‘darkness’ and ‘creation’,- a primordial division from which the Egyptian Ogdoad expanded (within the Gnostic Logos of John’s Gospel, as what the CCRU understood to be Taddum, an overcoding of Lemurian time-sorcery) in multiples of two, up to 8 distinct ‘elder gods’,- a binary split upon which the AION slithers impenetrably, (as what the CCRU calls the Great Babylonian Worm, Hummpa) never collapsing itself to a singularity, that it might occupy the center,- ** which would be the “Eye of Horus”, upon which basis the Egyptians evolved a new pantheon of 9 beings, that is, the Ennead, as a technological replacement for the first model of the binary theogon capable of incorporating an idea of the in-between state. The AOE was focused almost entirely on surviving the “Excruciation of Humppa-Taddum”, and thus sought the secrets of Neo-Atlantean chronoplastics, that they might preserve their magickal knowledge and potency in similar time-viroids secreted into parallel timelines, in both multiple pasts and futures, that stand unaffected by the coming Excruciation at the terminus of Pisces and the entrance into Aquarius.] and through which different knowledge-artifacts (‘zairja’, like the Idearium recovered by Hermaedion) can be hidden in astral wombs and pyromantic somatoforms, (thus the Zothyrian gnostics entirely erased themselves from our own timeline and hid themselves away in another using one such astral container) while, for Nummagrammaticists, it lies in the invocation of mostly chronodemons and amphidemons, or in any case, those beings capable of aiding them in “weaponing mandela-effects” and facilitating their campaigns of time-warfare against certain other sects. In the Hermaedionic view, such beings arise as non-progenies reft in the metaphysical structure of reality by the ‘material-imprints’ noted above. The two groups of Zothyrian cultists and Nummagrammaticists of course tried to erase each other from their respective timelines for many ages (many ‘strange aeons’) before the Zoythrians simply decided to hide themselves away in some parallel timeline, moving across parallel realities as discarnate and fragmentated sub-consciousnesses through their chronospores, (which would hopeless multiply and eventually reconstitute them somewhere) while the Nummagrammaticists continued temporal-warfare with the AOE and the Catholic Oecumenon on our own.
[size=85]* We have two formulations, nearly identical, from which we should understand exaptation in terms of the 'recognition of knowing’s unknowing as a ‘structuring principle’:
-
Art of Shipwrecking: “In this context, the only accepted universal ontology is that which claims that everything is thematizable, except “everything is thematizable” (cf. Habermas, 1984). The unique ontology not only admits that it is questionable that it is not infallible at all and that often (but not always!) local values are expressed in it, but it also uses this recognition as a structuring principle when it constructs itself.”
-
Dark Correlationism: Mysticism, Magic, and the New Realisms. Rebekah Sheldon. “This, Thacker teaches, has also been the task of the horror genre and of apophatic mysticism, which is sometimes called negative theology or darkness mysticism. In the work of supernatural horror writers equally as much as the theology of Christian mystics, darkness signals a limit. Often associated with a type of speech—a commitment to the unsayable—apophatic mysticism in fact uses negative constructions to give shape to a positivity that is itself strictly unknowable and indescribable. For the 14th century’s Meister Eckhart, for example, the divine can never be known for itself but only through the mediation of blindness. “The Godhead radiates light, but the human only receives dark-ness” (Thacker 2015a, 26). Darkness, then, like Harman’s withdrawn objects, signals the pressure of something that can only present as nothing. What we know is our own unknowing.”
** I would insert here an important distinction related to the ‘primordial split’, the aionios, and the many theories of xenopsychological phenomenon. Sysynphreus differs from Hermaedion in pronouncing Phanes as a coward; in accusing him of what, in Holderlinian poetics, we understand as the “divine infidelity”. In Hermaedion’s view, Phanes’ goal of achieving total self-reflection through the resolution and dissolution of his fractured Multiplicity (and the apotheosis of consciousness through the epistrophe, in Plotinus’ expression, or ‘return’ to unity) was noble, and one subverted by the aeons and archons alike. In Sysynphreus’ view, however, Phanes was the first to cowardly flee,- from his own fractured multiplicity, at the abomenal surface of the seething precreation, out of which the Demiurge later created the World in his absence as a haunting reminder of the great failure of Existence, and an irreparable gulf torn between Phanes and his Unity, to which he shall never return- the primordial split in its most ancestral formulation. For Hermaedion, the Demiurge heroically sacrifices himself in deliberately failing to return creation to the height of Phanes so that he could leave behind his own ‘murmuring’ within it as an anti-gnosis, and this for the improvement of mankind, that we should achieve Unitas for ourselves, while, for Sysynphreus, the Demiurge is a Luciferic force bent on preventing all beings from grasping the intended Unity of Phanes, that is, the apotheosis of consciousness. It was Phanes’ fleeing that left behind the great murmuring, the ectromaton, the missing center. Accordingly, a great demon was born from this material-imprint, the first murmuring of the Outside, which Sysynphreus named, using certain Qlippothic gematria, “Haromaiel”- the Impenetrable Center, the Demiurge as a demonic entity rebelliously haunting reality with the ‘phanic echo’,- an eternal barrier to the entrance to Unitas, consciousness, and apotheosis. Around him the Binary God squirms in between the two extremes of the primordial split,- a demon named Sithalech, intent on preventing any who make it to his liminal boundary from ever passing between the poles and touching the center. Such entities are quintessential anti-consciousnesses, and the study of them detailed by the likes of Hermaedion and Sysynphreus offers us the most developed theory of chronodemons, amphidemons, xenodemons, Transyuggothic forces, and other such ‘xenopsychological phenomenon’. [/size]