nihilism

See how he goes about it? He bitches about nihilists being only about the idea, the theoretical, the logos, the ideological, the social/memetic constructs.

It is as though he has the nihilist in his pocket. He pulls him out and says, “look everyone, I have the ‘all is nil, meaningless and illusory’ nihilist here”.

As though anyone who dares to construe nihilism as anything other than in how he encompasses it up in the fluffy white clouds that are his own serial intellectual contraptions is necessarily wrong. By definition.

And, over and again, I challenge him to come here and defend the components of his own argument against the components of mine.

How about it, Satyr? Or anyone else there or here who defends his point of view. Let’s agree on a particular set of circumstances and see what unfolds.

Here in the philosophy forum or over at Rant.

Satyrs dick is so tiny he has to sit down to pee. He is a Canadian atheistic, hippie-inbred materialist too who has his own evolution, his own nihilism, his own history and his own pretty much everything else since he is a complete goon.

Removed for irrelevance.

Me too!

Ha!

In defense of Nihilism in the modern day
Ayush

The immediate objection here of course is that there does not appear to be a way in which to actually defend this other than from within the gap between what you think true knowledge is “in your head” here and now and all there is to be known about anything given an understanding of existence itself.

Now this makes sense to me. But only because I myself have of late been unable to find any inherent meaning or purpose. On the other hand…

1] this does not exclude the possibility that they both do in fact exist given the gap between, well, you know.
2] the human condition is such that all that is necessary for there to be an inherent meaning and purpose to life is merely to believe that there is. After all, over the course of human history to date, there have already been countless hundreds of dogmas proposed. And some of which brutally enforced.

Reconfigure the Ethical Nihilist into the moral nihilist and, here and now, there I am. Or, for you, here I am. Still, I seem to be propelling myself here in conflicted directions. My aim seems intent on either coming across an argument that is successful in deconstructing and then reconstructing my own current assumptions in the direction of an inherent meaning and purpose to life; or to deconstruct the inherent meaning and purpose of the objectivists among us so as to bring them closer to my own fractured and fragmented frame of mind. The search for another that I can at least share my own grim conclusions with. And actually be understood.

Alas, however, ILP has now been taken over – more or less – by the Kids and the fulminating fanatics. There are just fewer and fewer minds here that might be successful in at least challenging my own set of conclusions. Then this stuff:

Now I am more and more embedded in the ways of godot.

Define dasein.

To witless:

Now, I have already done the “define dasein” bit with him. On this thread above or on another thread.

And, well, who knows how he will react to this, right? If it’s just another of his caustic rants, I’ll report it to Carleas. As, previously, I said I would if he goes off the deep end on one of my philosophy board threads.

Then it’s “beyond my control”.

And it is what’s ‘beyond Your control’ is what entails The Wait for godot, that is a very weighted archytype.

You are lying through your teeth you kook, you never defined dasein. You are a waste of time like the kook SATIRE…shameless liar and hypocrite, impossible to deal with. show me where you define dasein please!!!

Bro. Do u know what a signature thread is. Biggs has signature threads he will gladly direct u toward like seventeen times.

so what? there is no definition of dasein in these threads…in fact…his first page of his first thread does not even talk about what dasein is at all…show me where he defines dasein,its not that hard is it???

You haven’t seen the story about the belly of the working class beast and stuff? Biggs, hit em with the threads bro.

References are a problem.
Like mistaken identity, and a definition can turn the simple into an obstruce complexity. But even kooks can define any idea into challenging and oft
contradictory allusions.

Which may be a good thing, …

As long as opposing opinions are permitted …to tolerate an excluded middle.

i once had a painful hemorrhoids on my anus from cycling too much…everytime I read biggie something itches me down there…no clue what it is though…

Note to others:

Here is my own entirely subjective rooted-in-dasein assessment of promethean75.

And, indeed, the nihilism thread could not possibly more appropriate for it.

Now, back when he was zoots allure and, then, post prison, on his initial return here as promethean75, he would often post things that were more substantive in nature. Whether in regard to philosophy or politics, he had things to say that seemed to be well thought out and, well, dammit, substantial.

Sure, as with phoneutria, he was always quite capable of being – playing? – the smartass. And his wit [like hers] was often devastating. He nailed the pinheads here time and again. And I reveled in their combined forays. But, by and large, like her, if on the other side of the political spectrum, he still seemed more interested in diving out into the deep end of the philosophical pool.

Then something changed. Less and less would we be given the substantive posts and more and more bombarded with the bantering “social media” exchanges with those like Mr. Reasonable. Projecting to us more as the man every woman wants and every man wants to be. The really, really, “cool” dude. Motorcycles and bongs. Yes, the poop thread mentality we all know and love here at ILP.

Why? Forget about it.

How the fuck would I know? It would be like trying to figure out Carleas here of late.

Still, if I were to hazard an educated guess, I would suggest that it might revolve around this bit of irony: that he sees himself as more the true nihilist. His bantering chit-chat posts are actually his way of mocking those like me who still do feel inclined toward “substance” here. You know, if I really do believe that human interactions are essentially meaningless and absurd.

And I get that. Yes, I do recognize how, in fact, a larger and larger part of me is grateful to him for the reminder. But something still emanating up from out of my own existential rendition of dasein, won’t allow me to just chuck it all.

Yet.

So, let’s see what this all comes to. You know, on, say, this side of the grave?

what a spook

You’ve been doing a lot of spook busting recently, P-youth. I think u belong in the maxtrix with me.

thats too fucking gay bro, I honestly think I should stop busting kooks…its not like it makes me better or smarter and its not like I can stop goons from spouting insanities…what do you think? does mr. hemorrhoid in my dasein deserve to be spat at and called a kook??? is talking shit a sin??? and btw…i am not against republicans…they are a bunch of cowardly limp dick salesmen but I think the Yanks must work with what they have and do their best instead of rejecting everything and being cynical. find reasonable people from all sides of the spectrum and try to work out some solutions for a better future instead of being an autistic goof ball waiting for the world to end…the autistic kooks will have to wait a bit…maybe they will manage to rape some poor woman before it happens???who knows.

btw which one of you flashed his dick to little girls??? i am not going to even speak to degenerate like that, i hope its not you.