[b]Helmut Newton
There must be a certain look of availability in the women I photograph. I think the woman who gives the appearance of being available is sexually much more exciting than a woman who’s completely distant. This sense of availability I find erotic.[/b]
One possible translation: will she fuck me or not?
I like photographing women who appear to know something of life. I recently did a session with a great beauty, a movie star in in her thirties. I photographed her twice within three weeks and the second time I said: “You’re much more beautiful today than you were three weeks ago.” And she replied: “But I’m also three weeks older”.
So, is this just more macho bullshit? Or is she in on it?
…what I try to do is a good bad picture. I work it out very carefully, and then I do something that looks as if it went wrong.
So, anyone do that here? The good bad post.
Some people’s photography is an art. Not mine. Art is a dirty word in photography. All this fine art crap is killing it already.
Well, he was basically just a fashion photographer.
It began when I was so ill that there was a good chance of dying. I promised myself that if I survived I would never again pander to a magazine’s requests or follow the ideas of art directors. I would only make images which were personal, which arose out of my own life.
You know, whatever that means.
On the other hand…
Some people’s photography is an art. Mine is not. If they happen to be exhibited in a gallery or a museum, that’s fine. But that’s not why I do them. I’m a gun for hire.
Ka-ching photography let’s call it.