If the relevance between the correspondence between the environmental evolution of the environment to the world can be reduced AND the sensory evolution of the entire gap between the corresponding species can be induced , then the patterns of similarity may suggest such conclusion.
But then, what is missing is the pivotally missing inflective - reflective symbolic equivolance as in a micro elemental sequence e of symbols, connecting pictures as ideograms.
Without it it is still a hypothesis.
Although on a probable scale, the preponderence to almost absolute certainty appears overwhelmingly convincing to assert absolute truth of the selection principle.
Note: for those who can not recall the substantially formed content of arguing, the re-view becomes an useless test of credibility.
Further associations missed cannot be induced except literally reassign a partially abandoned criteria for maintaining it’s hypothetical.
So an infinitely reduced constant such ‘proof’ appears as an invincible logical certainty.
Except on the level as the minimal approach to certainty becomes appearently incalculable.
Without admitting that Kammefer was right, or wrong, one can discern the sad outcome he was compelled to, just by following the retro-logic of political expedience that prefigured the outcome.
Lamarkism may be totally off kilter here, nevertheless, the vein of disagreement may still subsist.
How does an ape go from a zoo to The TETRAMEGATRON-TETRAGRAMMATON
It won’t look back.
youtu.be/JCo7Qyez3Ac
Apes Might Know That You Don’t Know What They Know
“The latest volley in a decades-long debate about apes’ theory of mind involved one scientist dressing up as King Kong and stealing from his colleague.”
Undetermined source
Mega-tetra-tron - - - to -
Mega-ton- don’t look back
PENTAGRAM