Ecmandu wrote:I can count more than the fingers on my hand how many gay and lesbian people who don’t want to be defined.
A dude with a dick who wears make-up, wears dresses and is gay as fuck, wants to be called “they” or “them”.
A woman with a pussy who has never been attracted to men and states she never will be gets offended at being called a lesbian!
It’s a label, right? Fuck you! We have categories for this shit.
I had MagsJ and iambiguous in mind for this post.
“If you label me it’s not PC”
Fuck you people! I have categories and so do you!
Isn’t that what post modernism and post-structuralism is?!?! Not wanting to be accountable!
With iambiguous and MagsJ ... they don’t want to be accountable for words or behavior.
To these fucks in the world, I tell them (as I do anyone one in existence) (spirit or otherwise) judge me with all of your fucking might!!!!
Closeted homosexuals are the worst kind of people. Closeted moralists are even worse. Judge me you fucks! Look at my whole life story and fucking judge me even though you’re terrified of being judged! Judge me. Judge me not only with your own minds, judge me with all of your friends as well. Actually, you stupid fucking twits, judge me with all the infinite fucking beings in all of existence! Do it! Right now! I’m not daring you! I’m telling you... do it!
Actually, you stupid fucking twits, judge me with all the infinite fucking beings in all of existence!
promethean75 wrote:Actually, you stupid fucking twits, judge me with all the infinite fucking beings in all of existence!
I'm not sure what this would accomplish. If you had infinite fucking beings making fucking judgements, all possible fucking judgements would at some point be made... in which case there would be as many good fucking judgements as bad fucking judgements... not only that... each would be fucking infinite in number.
derleydoo wrote:Not a judgement - more, an observation! Lately, I have noticed your liberal use of the 'h-word'. Here, a brief selection from the past couple of weeks. Each letter represents a different post.
A. I fucking hate all those bitches and assholes that say crazy shit to me on the street.
B. That’s logic! Fuck moral nihilists hate logic! So you’re a hypocrite to hate
me, because your hatred requires logic!
C. IQ 45 is a moral nihilist which is why you hate him so much; you hate your reflection in the
mirror.
D. I hate those fucks, I hate you actually. My hate is
not me projecting, I really hate people that cry out loud that if god
doesn’t exist, morality doesn’t or can’t exist! You’re trolling the god concept.
E. I used to hate message boards where all they said was “cite”. Fucking hated those fucks!
F. Yes. You are an asshole and a hypocrite. Deal with it! By the way. I fucking hate trash like you
that doesn’t have their personal consent violated when a 6 year old girl is raped! Fuck you! Go to fucking hell! And when
I say that you cocky piece of shit, it means something!
G. Context assumes you’re talking to me, because you said something hateful and you hate me, and you’ve many times
stated that you love iambiguous. Here’s the deal: post modernism and post structuralism is hate speech.
H. Think you’re pretty smart huh? Then stop fucking talking ever... the courts hate hypocrisy.
I. People who seek revenge hate you
J. Hate these people
omnia vincit amor
Ecmandu wrote:derleydoo wrote:Not a judgement - more, an observation! Lately, I have noticed your liberal use of the 'h-word'. Here, a brief selection from the past couple of weeks. Each letter represents a different post.
A. I fucking hate all those bitches and assholes that say crazy shit to me on the street.
B. That’s logic! Fuck moral nihilists hate logic! So you’re a hypocrite to hate
me, because your hatred requires logic!
C. IQ 45 is a moral nihilist which is why you hate him so much; you hate your reflection in the
mirror.
D. I hate those fucks, I hate you actually. My hate is
not me projecting, I really hate people that cry out loud that if god
doesn’t exist, morality doesn’t or can’t exist! You’re trolling the god concept.
E. I used to hate message boards where all they said was “cite”. Fucking hated those fucks!
F. Yes. You are an asshole and a hypocrite. Deal with it! By the way. I fucking hate trash like you
that doesn’t have their personal consent violated when a 6 year old girl is raped! Fuck you! Go to fucking hell! And when
I say that you cocky piece of shit, it means something!
G. Context assumes you’re talking to me, because you said something hateful and you hate me, and you’ve many times
stated that you love iambiguous. Here’s the deal: post modernism and post structuralism is hate speech.
H. Think you’re pretty smart huh? Then stop fucking talking ever... the courts hate hypocrisy.
I. People who seek revenge hate you
J. Hate these people
omnia vincit amor
You really dug for all these! I have to show you an embarrassed honor for that!
derleydoo wrote:Ecmandu wrote:derleydoo wrote:Not a judgement - more, an observation! Lately, I have noticed your liberal use of the 'h-word'. Here, a brief selection from the past couple of weeks. Each letter represents a different post.
A. I fucking hate all those bitches and assholes that say crazy shit to me on the street.
B. That’s logic! Fuck moral nihilists hate logic! So you’re a hypocrite to hate
me, because your hatred requires logic!
C. IQ 45 is a moral nihilist which is why you hate him so much; you hate your reflection in the
mirror.
D. I hate those fucks, I hate you actually. My hate is
not me projecting, I really hate people that cry out loud that if god
doesn’t exist, morality doesn’t or can’t exist! You’re trolling the god concept.
E. I used to hate message boards where all they said was “cite”. Fucking hated those fucks!
F. Yes. You are an asshole and a hypocrite. Deal with it! By the way. I fucking hate trash like you
that doesn’t have their personal consent violated when a 6 year old girl is raped! Fuck you! Go to fucking hell! And when
I say that you cocky piece of shit, it means something!
G. Context assumes you’re talking to me, because you said something hateful and you hate me, and you’ve many times
stated that you love iambiguous. Here’s the deal: post modernism and post structuralism is hate speech.
H. Think you’re pretty smart huh? Then stop fucking talking ever... the courts hate hypocrisy.
I. People who seek revenge hate you
J. Hate these people
omnia vincit amor
You really dug for all these! I have to show you an embarrassed honor for that!
Nope, didn't take long at all! Just searched the word 'hate' - up you popped! There was a moment when I questioned my actions. Removing hatred from the world is not going to happen overnight! Every little helps!
Please forgive the wink! I hope you saw the funny side.![]()
![]()
Consent violation? How does that differ from the golden rule?
Ecmandu wrote:The golden rule (nor any religion including the Bible) doesn’t state that when any being in the cosmos is having their consent violated, then so do all of us.
Why? Because not only does this falsify an omnibenevolent creator (god created the earth and said it was good) it also makes “our father in heaven” a psychopath. Who the fuck ignores all this shit forever? What’s god doing in heaven? Feeling good and banging lots of bitches?
The fact that this world even exists in the first place should cause every being in existence to not enthusiastically state “this is a great day!”
derleydoo wrote:Ecmandu wrote:The golden rule (nor any religion including the Bible) doesn’t state that when any being in the cosmos is having their consent violated, then so do all of us.
Why? Because not only does this falsify an omnibenevolent creator (god created the earth and said it was good) it also makes “our father in heaven” a psychopath. Who the fuck ignores all this shit forever? What’s god doing in heaven? Feeling good and banging lots of bitches?
The fact that this world even exists in the first place should cause every being in existence to not enthusiastically state “this is a great day!”
I take it you are not a great fan of Karma. The ongoing process of judgement - every moment of every day.
Nature's retribution for lost harmony.
He/She had it coming.
A pity. Such a vision would enable you to live your life without getting your knickers in a twist every time you see something that you perceive as bad.
Someone says, "Nice Day." You could reply: "Isn't it just."
Ecmandu wrote:derleydoo wrote:Ecmandu wrote:The golden rule (nor any religion including the Bible) doesn’t state that when any being in the cosmos is having their consent violated, then so do all of us.
Why? Because not only does this falsify an omnibenevolent creator (god created the earth and said it was good) it also makes “our father in heaven” a psychopath. Who the fuck ignores all this shit forever? What’s god doing in heaven? Feeling good and banging lots of bitches?
The fact that this world even exists in the first place should cause every being in existence to not enthusiastically state “this is a great day!”
I take it you are not a great fan of Karma. The ongoing process of judgement - every moment of every day.
Nature's retribution for lost harmony.
He/She had it coming.
A pity. Such a vision would enable you to live your life without getting your knickers in a twist every time you see something that you perceive as bad.
Someone says, "Nice Day." You could reply: "Isn't it just."
‘Karma’ Is like a fucking RPG Nintendo game. That trivializes life’s sufferings. Nobody with a conscience would walk away from this and go to heaven leaving everyone behind.! Only sociopaths don’t have their consent violated from others having their consent violated. And even at that! Sociopaths have their consent violated all the time!
Meno_ wrote:There is nothing unusual in Ecmamdu, he belongs in a class of thinkers that Maldoror belonged to centuries ago.
derleydoo wrote:Meno_ wrote:There is nothing unusual in Ecmamdu, he belongs in a class of thinkers that Maldoror belonged to centuries ago.
Please can you provide a link, Meno.
iambiguous wrote:Admittedly, few things bring me as much pleasure in life as reducing objectivists down to this.
On the other hand, I have to admit, as well, that what I am doing here is taking of advantage of someone who may not be, well, altogether there.
Ecmandu wrote:derleydoo wrote:Meno_ wrote:There is nothing unusual in Ecmamdu, he belongs in a class of thinkers that Maldoror belonged to centuries ago.
Please can you provide a link, Meno.
Meno is getting desperate. I’m not a Maldoror.
I’ve never once in my life seen life as absurd. I’ve seen it as consent violating and evil, but never absurd.
I’m not an existentialist. I’m not a post modernist.
I've never claimed to be globally appealing to all minds..
promethean75 wrote:Godammit ecman you're cracking up.
Ecmandu wrote: I’m not consenting to idiots reacting!
iambiguous wrote:Ecmandu wrote: I’m not consenting to idiots reacting!
Then I'm not consenting to you calling me an idiot. Proving your point right?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users