When you fall into earth, its the same force as falling onto any fixed object, such as a 1/2 of earth. More on this later
Also, some of the equations dont seem to consider that motion has an infintesimally small resolution, when combining two forces with unknown temporal resolutions whos force is “exponential based on the distance” this is a problem
Such things have been examined millions of times by very educated and jealous skeptics. There are ontological flaws being presumed, but not such as to make any equation in error, merely the interpretation of the equations.
(and motion does NOT have a lower resolution, despite the Quantum Magi’s wet dreams).
Duality and improbability are MENTAL issues, not physical. Motion has no lower resolution at all. Motion has no “stop”. There are degrees of infinitesimal motion in literally all things at all times. There is no absolute zero nor absolute smallest step.
Nothing is ever at rest any way since the universe is in a constant state of motion due to gravity
You can however measure motion in individual frames of time as small as a fraction of a second
Perhaps my interpretation of the equations is wrong, but if f=m*sqr(v) why does an object bounce back the same as in the following example?
Consider that there are 2 bodies, one with a mass of the Earth, but one with a mass of the moon.
An object, a human, approaches both objects at the same speed. It collides.
The force upon the human is exactly the same, feels exactly the same, and has a push back exactly the same.
So we should assume that f=m*sqr(v) only applies to objects with low masses, and it is a parabolic function, rather than exponential. Once the formula starts dealing with medium masses, it loses its exponentiality, and as the masses get higher and higher, the variance decays exponentially.
well in that case, it is the energy formula which is mistaken.
and what’s with e=m*sqr(c)? there is no variable component to the equation, it’s all a fixed value. If the mass varies based on its speed, theres no where to input a speed in the equation, so the mass is calculated elsewhere. so it just seems like an arbitary equation that doesnt do anything, and it doesnt even match the other energy equation because it forgot to divide the mass by two. science doesnt add up. im starting to wonder if its all a hoax?