Hokay Chakra.
It was the “little more than robots” line, which has negative connotations, coming after “enhanced with artificial body parts”
Not only do I not believe he is less human but I don’t think a person who has had most of his body replaced with artificial limbs and organs and using enhancement like reading glasses, hearing aids or a voice box is less human, either. The technologies used in these examples are used to rectify something the person has lost or never had. This technology actually helps the person look and feel more human. I applaud using technology like this.
The “lost or never had” coupled with the final “look and feel more human” to me kinda sounds like you are equating a state of ‘being human’ with a list of abilities. To walk is human. To see clearly is human. To hear, to speak, is human. etc. And if a list of abilities is all it means to be human then well, we are getting more human all the time…
I mean, compare us now, in literate land, with Gug the cave man who could neither read nor write. Being able to do both, I’m then more human than Gug…?
What freaks me out is genetically-enhanced designer babies.
Then why haven’t the nutritionally enhanced babies of the last century or so freaked you out…? I mean - go into some ye-oldy-worldly village from yesteryear and look at the height of the doorways…? They were all fucking midgets compared to us.
What freaks me out is the nano biotech industry which wants to infuse our blood stream and brain with little bots that they can program to do as they wish. What freaks me out is the ideas put forward by Goertzel about putting receivers in our head and downloading info directly into our brains to make us ‘smarter’.
Learning to read and write involves if you like “programming the brain”. What’s the difference really, between spending a year or two at primary school learning to read, and downloading the skill straight from the future-net in a couple of minutes…? Both, to work, involve changing the structure and number of connections in our brains - Associating specific recurrent and consistant shapes with already present sequences of sounds. Both make us ‘smarter’ if smarter is reading books.
What freaks me out is Kurzweil’s idea of impregnating self replicating nanobots into every thing on the planet (it’s easier than it sounds) and turning the planet into a giant computer or virtual reality set someone, somewhere controls.
To be honest, a whole bunch of people on this planet lead really shitty lives. Monotonous, no escape, no choice to be other than they were condemned to be at birth, with no possibility of the system binding them changing within their lifetimes. If a perfectly realised, perceptionally indistinguishable from reality, consistant virtual world, with the possibilty of a more diverse choice-tree could be built - and made freely available - then great, a big ball of anguish the size of Africa suddenly evapourates. In the Matrix, I always thought Morpheus and Co. were the stupid ones.
What freaks me out are other mad scientists say that “the human race will split into two separate species… an attractive, intelligent ruling elite and an underclass of dim-witted creatures” and that this is not just likely, but inevitable.
And we don’t already have that…? Right now…?
What freaks me out is that nobody is asking us whether this is what we want for our world or whether a person who thinks like a computer and is emotionally lobotomised so that he’s always happy is what the human race should aim at becoming.
I think you underestimate how hard happiness is to manufacture. Heroin makes you happy, but you always have to up the dose.
Technology is not the problem. The problem is that technology is being pushed on us from all directions by people whose only aims are power, control and money rather than to serve humanity.
Pff. That’s always been the deal. Convenience vs. control. And yet the Amish still exist. We adopt most technology for the same reason we adopt anything, to stay competitive.