Unless your opponent paid me more, in which case I would defend their arguments. I work for the highest bidder and I don’t get attached to my arguments.
Trying to get all my work done before the weekend. How may of these did you need printed?
Please add in small text:
Having trouble winning debates or don’t know what to believe? NOT ANYMORE. Try Zoot Allures Contractors service; being right was never more easy and affordable.
Real question here is, do YOU know what to believe?
The market will determine that. The pragmatization of epistemology is what the consumer wants. They don’t care about what is true, they want what works. I provide practical philosophical solutions for everyday philosophical problems. Whether what I say is true or not doesn’t matter.
Who needs to debate, when belief is surprisingly a matter of real confrontation. That is what it is all about. It is only the meek, who are thought to be not up to the challenge. But that is getting old. there are actual wars going in for beliefs, and that’s passé as well, the Crusades well established that.
AofC, I don’t think you’ve had enough coffee today. Both are denigrating. I was pointing to the fact that ALREADY what’s his name is calling his waiting-in-the wings-to-be- born daughter a F ing Idiot. It doesn’t really matter the degree - he’s already referring to her in a derogatory way. The two key words here are F ing Idiot. Do you get that? Who is it who is actually being put down when a man speaks like that about women - any man or woman worth his or her gold will know the answer to that.
Let’s say she turns five and he uses that terminology with her. She might not so much understand the words then but she will surely understand the derogatory tone. Why doesn’t daddy like me. Why is daddy so angry with me. What did I do?
And when she gets a bit older, what kind of self-esteem is growing within her being taught in such a way by such a punk? In my book, a man who speaks like this is nothing but a punk. Do I care how much philosophy he knows or cares about when he can’t see the truth of things and his knowledge of philosophy leads to no wisdom.
You might want to explain that one to me. I don’t get it at all. I understand all your words here obviously but your reasoning seems way off.
So a young girl realizes that her father only considers her to be a bit of a Fing Idiot. In what way does that serve her? In what way do students learn if let’s say one doesn’t know the answer to something and so the teacher calls him or her a F ing Idiot. "Oh, but you’re not a complete F ing Idiot. Just a bit of one. That’s kind of insane thinking to me - or irrational.
I’m not a mysogynist at all. I like men - men who are men, who act like men - not boys. I enjoy a man’s company. I’m kind of from the school of thought that men and women harmonize…or can, with some work put into it. I don’t necessarily feel that we can’t live without one another but it’s still nice and enjoyable having men around at times.
I wasn’t aware that the patriarchal stereotype was SIMPLY about men preferring dumb woman - just that they think they are better than, greater than, and especially have to play like the daddy to all women, towering over them with their great power. lol
Actually, what you pointed to above kind of says that men who are patriarchal are kind of insecure. They don’t want a woman who is capable of thinking and acting for herself, capable of being autonomous, capable of making her own decisions, capable in just about everything that a woman could be capable of.
AofC
I’m actually looking for an answer here, AofC. In what wqay does it serve a daughter, especially a young child or an older teenage daughter, to be called a F ing Idiot. Again, it doesn’t matter the degree. Do you really feel that words like that build self-esteem? Do you really feel that words like that will cause the daughter or the son for that matter to want to reach for the stars, to be the best she or he can be? Even if you say, sure, it’s possible and perhaps it is - don’t you think that there is a better way to accomplish this than having the punk denigrate his young daughter or son? And let’s face it, even though this is only a scenario here, you don’t really think that this is going to be a one-time thing with this man, do you - this insecure, despotic, controlling puppeteer lol of a man?
So, what’s your answer?
Do you like my new avatar, AofC? i was going to ask you to give me an idea of a new one that might suit me but I decided against it. But if you like, you might propose my next one.
But there is a bit of harmony there don’t you think - in that I felt you had enough of looking at the other one. Now that’s a woman trying to meet a man somewhere in the middle. Who could possibly object to a little squirrel doing what comes naturally to him though I’m not quite sure what it is he is eating. Looks more like popcorn to me but there is a bit of stoicism in that image, don’t you think? I find it quite calming and instructive.
The ostrich left the building hopefully he’ll never come back again. But I have my doubts about that. 
All these personal (ad hom) attacks can be skipped and walked over, nothing important, no worthwhile responses yet.
One thing to note is Kristy West’s mental retardation. Apparently if a parent wants to teach their children, or a teacher teaching a student, then this is “Controlling their will”. Good thing for Kristy West that she was never educated nor taught as a child. She will remain mentally retarded for the rest of her days, implying that any education, except “humanism” I guess, is negative.
Everybody, stop teaching your children right now, otherwise you are an evil hater, according to Kristy West.
[ rolls his eyes ]
[ facepalm ]
I can’t believe how stupid some females are. However, I will forgive this. Shieldmaiden, I won’t allow Phoney nor Kristy West to represent you. I will not group these two complete retards in with you.
So now it’s your turn again. Go. Defend female intelligence/thought. Now’s your chance. And write something interesting. Give me hope in females (lol). Give me hope that there’s at least one cogent female around here.
Femaleness is not restricted to only who have female bodies. There are many such males who are females by mindset, trapped in a male body.
Display their charms is also one of basic characters of femaleness. Many modern males do not understand this but unwarranted display of their muscles, bodies, tattoos, haircuts etc is also femaleness. At the psychological level, there is not much difference between the those males and females.
Going one step further, it also applies to some modern intellectuals too. Maleness is not the matter of display but use only when and where it is required.
A male is not a true male unless he wins over the temptation of succumbing for unnecessary display of his qualities, either physical or mental.
True fighters do not showcase their weapons and strengths in the public order to get appreciation. They use their skills in only the battlefield, where all that is actually required. In the same way, true males do not unnecessarily try to display their intellectuality, where it is least required.
And, if any intellectual does that, realize that he is female wrapped in a male body, though she is unable to realize it.
With love,
Sanjay
Arc you misunderstood how he uses language.
When he said that his daugther won’t be a complete fucking idiot, he didn’t mean that she won’t be a complete fucking idiot but only a little bit of an idiot, he meant that she won’t be a complete fucking idiot as compared to some other people who are complete fucking idiots.
Also, misogynist means a woman-hater, you responded as if I called you a misandrist.
I don’t buy your modern bullshit that being weak means being strong, that being stupid means being smart and that being smart means being stupid etc. so nor do I buy that men who are dominant and patriarchal by nature and act in accordance with that nature are insecure, and feminized faggots who take it up the ass are so very self-confident.
P.S. thank for removing that avatar. It has affected my life a great deal. Just last night, I couldn’t sleep because I was thinking about your avatar and how hurtful it is to me on an emotional level. All I could think about was that gif of an ostrich sticking its head into the sand on and on, repeatedly. Today, it’s gotten so bad I was considering suicide, and just as I was about to blow my head off with a sawn-off shotgun, there I see the cute little squirrel in place of that nasty ostrich, and I think to myself: ‘life is nice’ and decide not to blow my brains out. Phew.
[size=50]P.P.S. The above is a lie and I never gave a shit[/size]
Phhhhew is right! If I were an psychologist I would say thank god you’re only borderline. I say this with somewhat of an assurance, since the primary symptom of borderline is frequent change of affect. usually due to a fix.
but surprise, an analyst I once knew who based her opinion on credible data, declared rather boldly, that society on the whole is borderline due to the shift from outworn dream analysis of repressed sexual guilt/and/or, it’s so called pornographication, toward the realization of the pitfalls of instant gratification.
moral: at least put it on hold for a few days (or longer), or, longer. Ferdinand Celine says that the symptoms of emptiness occur where even masturbation does not do it.
Are you saying that concepts like “male” and “female” depend merely on the subjective interpretation of that concepts?
arbiter, now I really have to qualify or even re-qualify the above, that if You are a Jungian at heart, You need not subscribe to that diagnosis. I was just merely stating a common occurrence of quickly changing affect, which is typical. If, on the other hand, this threshold had been overcome in Your situation, then, it may merely mean that the symbolism does not apply, (the subconscious underpinnings)’ and that more profound dynamics are at work.). the fact is , that even such trend setters as Freud, have been able to overcome their latent homosexuality, for example, by way of arduous and much be labored self analysts, a Los Karen Horney.
Excuse Arminius for the interjection, my proposal. Me in at the wrong time. But to matters of hand, the pejorative is that, in the construction of personality, feeling like this orphan gender, may go am,omg ways in determining what gender You would like to be. in other words, let’s say you feel receptive,mor like a female one day, but aggressively male another day, can not there be established a cozy agreement, and sandwich yourself betwen the two concepts? Or, in all,actuality,mthose need gombe established a clear definition of what it means,? nowadays in the marketplace, I am. Sure You can find some sloul as divided as that,many form a perfect partnership. After all isn’t that what Plato suggested,way back when?
Literally , to answer that, yes, it may very well be a subjective determination. How You do that? many ways, too numerous to mention, but the entry point is what You wish for, and out focus upon, personality , as transcending gender, or the other way around. then after the primary difference has been set aside, then can start worrying about, hey, are there any secondary propositions You may wish to augment?
it is I believe, within the boundaries of the controllable. course, there may be a lot more to it then that.
Your interjection is excused, but the accent in my question is lying on the word “you”, because I would like to know whether Zinnat (Sanjay) believes in the the subjective interpretation of that concepts or not.
Would it also be okay to you if a plant thinks to be confined to a human’s body? 
What do you think about your body?
Is your body the “right” or the “wrong” one?
If it is the “wrong” one: What is your “right” one?
Unless you make a person capable of producing a sex cell of a gender they can’t be called that gender. That’s the distinguishing feature of a sex… not which organ they have. So it seems silly to me to have a sex change, because it isn’t a sex change, it’s a body part change, a purposeful mutilation of one’s natural body part for nefarious reasons.
You can’t be another gender unless they hook up some ovaries or some testicles. Can they do that? If they could, the new argument would be; what are the proper hormone levels and balances for a male and female, and so on. The controversy will never get beyond that fundamental change in gender identity argument… if gender is just physical, couldn’t it transplanted? Is gender a sexual organ, a part of the brain, a balance of hormones and neurochemicals, what? Is it an immaterial spirit thing? Where is it then?
Liberals will always play the scientific grey area… same for abortion. At what point is the fetus a ‘person’, etc. Haha, you don’t know, therefore; no anti-abortion legislation, suckers.
I am in the wrong body. Deep inside I feel like I have 4 feet long legs and an ass that goes pow!