That is true. The psychology of the Joker is akin to an insane grandma with too much testosterone. Instead of merely pulling cheeks with her fingers, she has to literally cut a smile into them. They say that bullies are just little girls on the inside. Joker (in the cartoons) seems to display a personality very similar to Angelica from Rugrats.
Phyllo may be a male or female, and whether or not they are male or female they may have a nice ass, so maybe I will maybe I won’t. He or she would have to have to send pics before I make the final decision.
Now to stay on topic, my post wasn’t trolling but drawing parallels to moral objectivism and bully psychology, what circumstances pertaining to casein allow physiologies such as Joker and Angelica to arise.
Same behavoir and psychology as the joker.
Total manipulator who is obsessed with toys, chaos and bullying, who occasionally comes to her senses and is nice at rare moments. She even wears orange and purple.
In another episode she has a mock trial, loses her own trial, then goes on a hateful rant exactly the same that the joker would. In the episode, she destroys a clown lamp, but this isn’t contradictory at all, the joker is not actually a happy clown or a happy person, deep down I don’t think he actually likes being a clown, he just uses the smile thing as an ironic offensive tool to mock society and assist with his hatred of people.