Feminism is obsolete

[zinnat]

@Pandora

What do you mean by men having to create an hole in their intellect? Most of the CEO’s of large corporations are men, most of world’s successful self-made millionaires/billionaires are men, most of the world politicians/leaders are men, and most of the current innovations (science/technology) are still made by men.
What hole are you talking about?

As i have already mentioned, I am not talking about any physical hole, but only a virtual one, and in their minds only, not anywhere else.

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole. Closed minds either do not make it, or even if they do in some rare cases, you get people like Hitler and Ganges Khan.

With love,
Sanjay

[ended6]

@zinnat

Nothing is irreversible. After getting nuked, which philosopher predicted that Japan would revive so rapidly and so strongly!

Do not underestimate the human’s power to adapt and survive against all odds.

Though, it may or may not return exactly where it was prior to feminism, but ultimately evolve to something workable for both genders for sure.

But, such phenomena takes time to run through their full courses, which may be extended to some centuries too.

With love,
Sanjay

Yeah meanwhile, we have to do what we gotta do here, how have you dealt with all this?

I’m not too sure im interested in something being workable for both genders, unless women enjoy be enslaved that is, right?..

But the question is, zinnat, how are we going to return them to a form of sexual slavery and then justify it socially?

With hate,
Mannequin.

[Pandora]

@zinnat

As i have already mentioned, I am not talking about any physical hole, but only a virtual one, and in their minds only, not anywhere else.

Well, thank you. I certainly hoped it was not a physical hole that were discussing. And why in the world did I even give you an impression that I was referring to a physical hole, anyway?

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole.

What effing hole?? Can you rephrase it as something else so it makes more sense?

Closed minds either do not make it, or even if they do in some rare cases, you get people like Hitler and Ganges Khan.

You speak of closed minds here. So do you mean open mindedness when you refer to your hole?

@zinnat

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

[gib]

@A Shieldmaiden

Let’s be realistic, there are men out there who do feel threatened by feminists, but these men are essentially ‘pussies’…

Well, let’s put this in perspective. A lot of men see feminists as: 1) a bunch of ladies who hate men, and 2) a bunch of ladies vying for political power. Now when you put those two together, from a man’s perspective, you get a very scary picture indeed. It would be like a Jew today seeing another Third Reich on the horizon. Would you call him a pussy for feeling threatened?

[James_S_Saint]

Feminism in itself isn’t a threat. It is a corruption that leads to annihilation. The purpose of feminism is to destroy via selfishness (as are all “liberal” incentives).

The two party system:
) The Conservationists.
) The Corruptionists.

Guess which is which.

[zinnat]

@Pandora

@zinnat

As i have already mentioned, I am not talking about any physical hole, but only a virtual one, and in their minds only, not anywhere else.

Well, thank you. I certainly hoped it was not a physical hole that were discussing. And why in the world did I even give you an impression that I was referring to a physical hole, anyway?

In which way you asked what hole, that forced me to make myself clearer.

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole.

What effing hole?? Can you rephrase it as something else so it makes more sense?

See, that was precisely the issue above. You already understand what i am talking about, but still asking What effing hole!

Closed minds either do not make it, or even if they do in some rare cases, you get people like Hitler and Ganges Khan.

You speak of closed minds here. So do you mean open mindedness when you refer to your hole?

Pandora, i do not think that was that much hard to understand, as you made it.

@zinnat

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

For more clarification, it means that though a man should not always listen/follow/obey to others, but still have enough humbleness and patience (feminine qualities or a virtual hole in their intellect) to be able to do that when it is required.

with love,
sanjay

[zinnat]

@mannequin

@zinnat

Nothing is irreversible. After getting nuked, which philosopher predicted that Japan would revive so rapidly and so strongly!

Do not underestimate the human’s power to adapt and survive against all odds.

Though, it may or may not return exactly where it was prior to feminism, but ultimately evolve to something workable for both genders for sure.

But, such phenomena takes time to run through their full courses, which may be extended to some centuries too.

With love,
Sanjay

Yeah meanwhile, we have to do what we gotta do here, how have you dealt with all this?

Fortunately, in which part of the world i live, it is not that much big problem, but it is certainly surfacing slowly.

I’m not too sure im interested in something being workable for both genders, unless women enjoy be enslaved that is, right?..

That it is your problem, which i do not think can be solved, now or ever.

But the question is, zinnat, how are we going to return them to a form of sexual slavery and then justify it socially?

Again, as that is not going to happen ever, thus the need of the justification also would not arise ever.

With hate,
Mannequin.

with love,
sanjay

[Pandora]

@zinnat

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole.

What effing hole?? Can you rephrase it as something else so it makes more sense?
See, that was precisely the issue above. You already understand what i am talking about, but still asking What effing hole!

You were insinuating.
Insinuating without clarifying leads to ambiguity and confusion. I don’t really know what exactly you are trying to say, or whether you mean it in a positive or negative way. To me, a “hole” (in intellect) can mean a number of things: a weakness, a need, a lack, damage, etc. To me, a hole is a negative, but apparently, you choose to show it off to us as a positive, I.e., humbleness/patience. To me, you are still portraying it as damage, only sugar coating it.

@zinnat

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

Translation: An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can lobotomize themselves but not to the extent where they are lobotomized and castrated (even though the latter naturally follows the former); pretending to balance whatever’s left of their so-called egos by playing the back and forth penetration game in which everyone takes his turn of being equally penetrating and penetrated.

@zinnat

For more clarification, it means that though a man should not always listen/follow/obey to others, but still have enough humbleness and patience (feminine qualities or a virtual hole in their intellect) to be able to do that when it is required.

Are you proposing the practice of sincere humbleness and patience, or hypocrisy of?

[Arminius]

@James S Saint

Feminism has only been about racism and socialism. And now that they have won that game, yeah, you could say that it is obsolete.

These “they” are only a few, and they are men. A few men have won that game.

The winner have always been a few - a few men.

Have the citizens won? No.
Have the workers as the proletarians won? No.
Have the women won? No.

[zinnat]

@Pandora

@zinnat

And, no man can ever make it to the top without having that hole.

What effing hole?? Can you rephrase it as something else so it makes more sense?
See, that was precisely the issue above. You already understand what i am talking about, but still asking What effing hole!

You were insinuating.
Insinuating without clarifying leads to ambiguity and confusion. I don’t really know what exactly you are trying to say, or whether you mean it in a positive or negative way. To me, a “hole” (in intellect) can mean a number of things: a weakness, a need, a lack, damage, etc. To me, a hole is a negative, but apparently, you choose to show it off to us as a positive, I.e., humbleness/patience. To me, you are still portraying it as damage, only sugar coating it.

I was neither using that in any bad sense nor sugar coating it. It looks to me that perhaps you did not read that post of SM, to which i was replying. I was merely extending that very analogy what she put forth. That is only why i used similar terms.

I was using hole as an a metaphor for being able to absorb that incoming from others what is necessary or required.

@zinnat

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

Translation: An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can lobotomize themselves but not to the extent where they are lobotomized and castrated (even though the latter naturally follows the former); pretending to balance whatever’s left of their so-called egos by playing the back and forth penetration game in which everyone takes his turn of being equally penetrating and penetrated.

Pandora, one can interpret anything in any way which one wants, but the previous context should be kept in the mind while interpretation. And, when you questioned, i gave clarification too.

@zinnat

For more clarification, it means that though a man should not always listen/follow/obey to others, but still have enough humbleness and patience (feminine qualities or a virtual hole in their intellect) to be able to do that when it is required.

Are you proposing the practice of sincere humbleness and patience, or hypocrisy of?

Of course, which all guanine humbleness and patience from the bottom of the heart, otherwise it would not serve any purpose.

with love,
sanjay

[The_Eternal_Warrior]

I do know that the women’s lib movement died simply because women preferred to be revered rather than have equality. There will probably always be things that women can get that men can’t, just for having a pussy.

[Mictlantecuhtli]

@Random Factor

I do know that the women’s lib movement died simply because women preferred to be revered rather than have equality. There will probably always be things that women can get that men can’t, just for having a pussy.

Remember, in a consumerist society reproduction or pussy is a commodity.

[The_Eternal_Warrior]

Old matriarchies are wont to reemerge in the world. Many men don’t realize that women have ruled the world for just as much of history as men. With more men than women in the world its a buyers market and we’re the meat product of a world bent on vegan lifestylism.

[Mictlantecuhtli]

The reaction of a totalitarian feminist state almost guarantees a re-emergence of patriarchy and it won’t be a non-violent one either as political feminism intensifies. Do you honestly think men are just going to sit idly by taking it up their collective asses without the slightest reaction or response?

When men become frustrated or oppressed our reactionary activities include revolution, war, radicalization, violence, and discord. Men are never satisfied with idleness or being oppressed for very long where unlike women we don’t protest with signs and lobby for rights under law. The intense reaction of men almost always ends up violence and bloodshed.

Feminists should realize what happens to women in times of civil war, total war, or complete collapse of societies.

But hey, don’t say we didn’t warn you beforehand…

Political feminism is playing a dangerous game worldwide and the eventual male backlash against it will be horrific. You reap what you sew.

[The_Eternal_Warrior]

And yet, the male backlash has already occurred. Witch burnings, lack of equality in voting and wages, etc. If you think that women don’t have the right or that right doesn’t make might when might has made right too many faulty things, then I pity you.

[Mictlantecuhtli]

@Random Factor

And yet, the male backlash has already occurred. Witch burnings, lack of equality in voting and wages, etc. If you think that women don’t have the right or that right doesn’t make might when might has made right too many faulty things, then I pity you.

Those are small historical incidences within a wider scope of history.

What I am talking about is massive global reactions on a much larger scale. Believe what you want.

[The_Eternal_Warrior]

I believe that your vision is limited and this is a moot matter and concern.

[Mictlantecuhtli]

@Random Factor

I believe that your vision is limited and this is a moot matter and concern.

Is it? Well, thank you for bringing it to my attention Mr. Smarty Pants.

[Pandora]

@zinnat

An ideal situation is that, when somehow men can create a hole in their intellect but without getting castrated; balancing of their egos, knowing when to penetrate intellectually but also knowing when to get penetrated intellectually by others.

@Zinnat

For more clarification, it means that though a man should not always listen/follow/obey to others, but still have enough humbleness and patience (feminine qualities or a virtual hole in their intellect) to be able to do that when it is required.

@Pandora

Are you proposing the practice of sincere humbleness and patience, or hypocrisy of?

@zinnat

Of course, which all guanine humbleness and patience from the bottom of the heart, otherwise it would not serve any purpose.

Sounds like actual self-castration, without actually getting castrated. You cannot sincerely, or as you say, from the bottom of the heart suppress your masculinity without being castrated in some form, unless you’re being hypocritical/talking about 2 separate identities/egos.

[Pandora]

@HaHaHa

@Random Factor

I do know that the women’s lib movement died simply because women preferred to be revered rather than have equality. There will probably always be things that women can get that men can’t, just for having a pussy.

Remember, in a consumerist society reproduction or pussy is a commodity.

What, jealous? You can now have a sex change (subsidized by Medicare) and get a pussy of your own and flaunt it to your heart’s content. And because perversion is the new trend, I’m sure you won’t have a problem of finding sugar daddies to support you and fawn over you.
Get your own pussy now and be the WOMAN you’ve always secretly wished you really were.